Acceptable registrations in the queue through May 12 at 7:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Michigan poised to ban employers from firing workers for having abortions
-
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:48 pm
Michigan poised to ban employers from firing workers for having abortions
https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-gover ... -abortions
From the article:
“This bill will make sure that women cannot be fired or retaliated against based on their reproductive health decisions,” said Rep. Carrie Rheingans, D-Ann arbor. “Those decisions should never make a woman afraid that she is getting forced out of her job.”
Funny, she and the rest of Democrats had no problem making sure that women could be fired or retaliated against based on their vaccination health decisions.
From the article:
“This bill will make sure that women cannot be fired or retaliated against based on their reproductive health decisions,” said Rep. Carrie Rheingans, D-Ann arbor. “Those decisions should never make a woman afraid that she is getting forced out of her job.”
Funny, she and the rest of Democrats had no problem making sure that women could be fired or retaliated against based on their vaccination health decisions.
Re: Michigan poised to ban employers from firing workers for having abortions
Let’s do this slowly. Reproductive decisions involve the two people reproducing. Being vaccinated to reduce the chances of you burdening the healthcare system more than you need to is different. That burden and strain on the system as a whole affects EVERYONE if you decide to be selfish.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:10 pmhttps://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-gover ... -abortions
From the article:
“This bill will make sure that women cannot be fired or retaliated against based on their reproductive health decisions,” said Rep. Carrie Rheingans, D-Ann arbor. “Those decisions should never make a woman afraid that she is getting forced out of her job.”
Funny, she and the rest of Democrats had no problem making sure that women could be fired or retaliated against based on their vaccination health decisions.
-
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: Michigan poised to ban employers from firing workers for having abortions
So do a lot of other health issues, obesity being primary. Should government force obese people to slim down to lessen the burden and reduce costs or make them lose their jobs?Rate This wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:13 pmLet’s do this slowly. Reproductive decisions involve the two people reproducing. Being vaccinated to reduce the chances of you burdening the healthcare system more than you need to is different. That burden and strain on the system as a whole affects EVERYONE if you decide to be selfish.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:10 pmhttps://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-gover ... -abortions
From the article:
“This bill will make sure that women cannot be fired or retaliated against based on their reproductive health decisions,” said Rep. Carrie Rheingans, D-Ann arbor. “Those decisions should never make a woman afraid that she is getting forced out of her job.”
Funny, she and the rest of Democrats had no problem making sure that women could be fired or retaliated against based on their vaccination health decisions.
Re: Michigan poised to ban employers from firing workers for having abortions
Adding a category in a system that was fairly balanced throws everything off. Those examples you cite were already accounted for. Easing the burden of the extra new thing is what was needed. This is simple stuff. Try to keep up.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:31 pmSo do a lot of other health issues, obesity being primary. Should government force obese people to slim down to lessen the burden and reduce costs or make them lose their jobs?Rate This wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:13 pmLet’s do this slowly. Reproductive decisions involve the two people reproducing. Being vaccinated to reduce the chances of you burdening the healthcare system more than you need to is different. That burden and strain on the system as a whole affects EVERYONE if you decide to be selfish.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:10 pmhttps://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-gover ... -abortions
From the article:
“This bill will make sure that women cannot be fired or retaliated against based on their reproductive health decisions,” said Rep. Carrie Rheingans, D-Ann arbor. “Those decisions should never make a woman afraid that she is getting forced out of her job.”
Funny, she and the rest of Democrats had no problem making sure that women could be fired or retaliated against based on their vaccination health decisions.
-
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: Michigan poised to ban employers from firing workers for having abortions
I guess I wouldn't have expected you to be one to advocate that it's the government's business to make healthcare choices for women. But, we live in a bizarre world.Rate This wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 1:31 pmAdding a category in a system that was fairly balanced throws everything off. Those examples you cite were already accounted for. Easing the burden of the extra new thing is what was needed. This is simple stuff. Try to keep up.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:31 pmSo do a lot of other health issues, obesity being primary. Should government force obese people to slim down to lessen the burden and reduce costs or make them lose their jobs?Rate This wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:13 pmLet’s do this slowly. Reproductive decisions involve the two people reproducing. Being vaccinated to reduce the chances of you burdening the healthcare system more than you need to is different. That burden and strain on the system as a whole affects EVERYONE if you decide to be selfish.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:10 pmhttps://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-gover ... -abortions
From the article:
“This bill will make sure that women cannot be fired or retaliated against based on their reproductive health decisions,” said Rep. Carrie Rheingans, D-Ann arbor. “Those decisions should never make a woman afraid that she is getting forced out of her job.”
Funny, she and the rest of Democrats had no problem making sure that women could be fired or retaliated against based on their vaccination health decisions.
Re: Michigan poised to ban employers from firing workers for having abortions
When it comes to something that can affect others it’s all of our business. Shall we go word for word so it makes sense?Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 1:50 pmI guess I wouldn't have expected you to be one to advocate that it's the government's business to make healthcare choices for women. But, we live in a bizarre world.Rate This wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 1:31 pmAdding a category in a system that was fairly balanced throws everything off. Those examples you cite were already accounted for. Easing the burden of the extra new thing is what was needed. This is simple stuff. Try to keep up.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:31 pmSo do a lot of other health issues, obesity being primary. Should government force obese people to slim down to lessen the burden and reduce costs or make them lose their jobs?Rate This wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:13 pmLet’s do this slowly. Reproductive decisions involve the two people reproducing. Being vaccinated to reduce the chances of you burdening the healthcare system more than you need to is different. That burden and strain on the system as a whole affects EVERYONE if you decide to be selfish.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:10 pmhttps://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-gover ... -abortions
From the article:
“This bill will make sure that women cannot be fired or retaliated against based on their reproductive health decisions,” said Rep. Carrie Rheingans, D-Ann arbor. “Those decisions should never make a woman afraid that she is getting forced out of her job.”
Funny, she and the rest of Democrats had no problem making sure that women could be fired or retaliated against based on their vaccination health decisions.
-
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: Michigan poised to ban employers from firing workers for having abortions
Kind of like standing up for unborn children?Rate This wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 2:27 pmWhen it comes to something that can affect others it’s all of our business. Shall we go word for word so it makes sense?Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 1:50 pmI guess I wouldn't have expected you to be one to advocate that it's the government's business to make healthcare choices for women. But, we live in a bizarre world.Rate This wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 1:31 pmAdding a category in a system that was fairly balanced throws everything off. Those examples you cite were already accounted for. Easing the burden of the extra new thing is what was needed. This is simple stuff. Try to keep up.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:31 pmSo do a lot of other health issues, obesity being primary. Should government force obese people to slim down to lessen the burden and reduce costs or make them lose their jobs?Rate This wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:13 pmLet’s do this slowly. Reproductive decisions involve the two people reproducing. Being vaccinated to reduce the chances of you burdening the healthcare system more than you need to is different. That burden and strain on the system as a whole affects EVERYONE if you decide to be selfish.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:10 pmhttps://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-gover ... -abortions
From the article:
“This bill will make sure that women cannot be fired or retaliated against based on their reproductive health decisions,” said Rep. Carrie Rheingans, D-Ann arbor. “Those decisions should never make a woman afraid that she is getting forced out of her job.”
Funny, she and the rest of Democrats had no problem making sure that women could be fired or retaliated against based on their vaccination health decisions.
Re: Michigan poised to ban employers from firing workers for having abortions
Can I fire you for having Christian Nationalist beliefs?Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 2:54 pmKind of like standing up for unborn children?Rate This wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 2:27 pmWhen it comes to something that can affect others it’s all of our business. Shall we go word for word so it makes sense?Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 1:50 pmI guess I wouldn't have expected you to be one to advocate that it's the government's business to make healthcare choices for women. But, we live in a bizarre world.Rate This wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 1:31 pmAdding a category in a system that was fairly balanced throws everything off. Those examples you cite were already accounted for. Easing the burden of the extra new thing is what was needed. This is simple stuff. Try to keep up.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:31 pmSo do a lot of other health issues, obesity being primary. Should government force obese people to slim down to lessen the burden and reduce costs or make them lose their jobs?Rate This wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:13 pmLet’s do this slowly. Reproductive decisions involve the two people reproducing. Being vaccinated to reduce the chances of you burdening the healthcare system more than you need to is different. That burden and strain on the system as a whole affects EVERYONE if you decide to be selfish.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:10 pmhttps://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-gover ... -abortions
From the article:
“This bill will make sure that women cannot be fired or retaliated against based on their reproductive health decisions,” said Rep. Carrie Rheingans, D-Ann arbor. “Those decisions should never make a woman afraid that she is getting forced out of her job.”
Funny, she and the rest of Democrats had no problem making sure that women could be fired or retaliated against based on their vaccination health decisions.
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
-
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: Michigan poised to ban employers from firing workers for having abortions
Yeah, I guess, have at it. To be honest though, I would have quit your company long before that.TC Talks wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 2:59 pmCan I fire you for having Christian Nationalist beliefs?Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 2:54 pmKind of like standing up for unborn children?Rate This wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 2:27 pmWhen it comes to something that can affect others it’s all of our business. Shall we go word for word so it makes sense?Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 1:50 pmI guess I wouldn't have expected you to be one to advocate that it's the government's business to make healthcare choices for women. But, we live in a bizarre world.Rate This wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 1:31 pmAdding a category in a system that was fairly balanced throws everything off. Those examples you cite were already accounted for. Easing the burden of the extra new thing is what was needed. This is simple stuff. Try to keep up.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:31 pmSo do a lot of other health issues, obesity being primary. Should government force obese people to slim down to lessen the burden and reduce costs or make them lose their jobs?Rate This wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:13 pmLet’s do this slowly. Reproductive decisions involve the two people reproducing. Being vaccinated to reduce the chances of you burdening the healthcare system more than you need to is different. That burden and strain on the system as a whole affects EVERYONE if you decide to be selfish.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:10 pmhttps://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-gover ... -abortions
From the article:
“This bill will make sure that women cannot be fired or retaliated against based on their reproductive health decisions,” said Rep. Carrie Rheingans, D-Ann arbor. “Those decisions should never make a woman afraid that she is getting forced out of her job.”
Funny, she and the rest of Democrats had no problem making sure that women could be fired or retaliated against based on their vaccination health decisions.
- MWmetalhead
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12229
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am
Re: Michigan poised to ban employers from firing workers for having abortions
I am inclined to support this legislation.
The personal medical care I seek is none of my employer's fucking business so long as my actions do not pose harm to others in the company and do not negatively affect my ability to perform my job duties. (Not taking proper precaution to reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection when a legitimate pandemic was still occurring certainly does pose risk of harm to others in the company.)
I like the phony strawman arguments some Republicans presented during debate on the house floor. Politicians are such lying cocksuckers.
Employers certainly shouldn't be required to fund (via health insurance) elective abortion procedures; there's nothing in this legislation that would require them to do so.
The personal medical care I seek is none of my employer's fucking business so long as my actions do not pose harm to others in the company and do not negatively affect my ability to perform my job duties. (Not taking proper precaution to reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection when a legitimate pandemic was still occurring certainly does pose risk of harm to others in the company.)
I like the phony strawman arguments some Republicans presented during debate on the house floor. Politicians are such lying cocksuckers.
Employers certainly shouldn't be required to fund (via health insurance) elective abortion procedures; there's nothing in this legislation that would require them to do so.
Morgan Wallen is a piece of garbage.
Re: Michigan poised to ban employers from firing workers for having abortions
Are there even examples of anyone ever getting fired for an abortion? This seems very unnecessary.
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
Re: Michigan poised to ban employers from firing workers for having abortions
This is about saving face with people like Audiophile and BMW for getting their asses handed to them in the abortion referendum. What they haven't learned is that Michigan wants and will protect access to safe abortions.
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
Re: Michigan poised to ban employers from firing workers for having abortions
Well… what if a business finds out someone has one and that business is like a Chik-Fil-A or Hobby Lobby and they have “Christian beliefs” that guide their business dealings? That’s where this is going I think…
Re: Michigan poised to ban employers from firing workers for having abortions
Don't forget Khristian broadcasters...
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
-
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: Michigan poised to ban employers from firing workers for having abortions
So no one has been fired, simply a "just in case" type of law. OK, so isn't that like the argument for outlawing late term abortions? Pro-abortion folks keep telling us that they don't happen and so there is no need to outlaw them. But to be safe, we should ban them just to be sure.