Acceptable registrations in the queue through April 26 at 9:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Is TC Talks going to continue to be allowed to post slanderous statements?
Is TC Talks going to continue to be allowed to post slanderous statements?
First thing to address, this is not intended to be "a what about (insert your favorite troll here)?" or "hahahaha, mods, WHAT MODS?" thread. I sincerely want to know if slanderous statements will continue. I'm not asking for him to be banned or sent to the DBR, I just am tired of dealing with this nonsense.
Exhibit 1: TCT compares me to white trash domestic terrorists - https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 60#p634664
Exhibit 2: TCT states that I don't like taking orders from women - https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 30#p634923
Both statements are patently false and meet the definition of "an international (edit: meant intentional- thanks MCRF!) misleading statement to harm an individual's reputation."
As a point of reference, TCT likes to point out how woke he and his family are. Back in July, I posted a dipshit girl answering a question in a not so woke manner on Family Feud Canada suggesting it was his family. He reached out to me and I deleted the post in good faith. I had originally posted it because TCT was making statements similar to the ones above. I assumed that he would stop, but that was a bad call on my part.
Exhibit 1: TCT compares me to white trash domestic terrorists - https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 60#p634664
Exhibit 2: TCT states that I don't like taking orders from women - https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 30#p634923
Both statements are patently false and meet the definition of "an international (edit: meant intentional- thanks MCRF!) misleading statement to harm an individual's reputation."
As a point of reference, TCT likes to point out how woke he and his family are. Back in July, I posted a dipshit girl answering a question in a not so woke manner on Family Feud Canada suggesting it was his family. He reached out to me and I deleted the post in good faith. I had originally posted it because TCT was making statements similar to the ones above. I assumed that he would stop, but that was a bad call on my part.
Last edited by Matt on Sun Oct 11, 2020 9:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
-
- Posts: 6464
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Is TC Talks going to continue to be allowed to post slanderous statements?
I think only Turkeytop could be capable of an international misleading statement unless you meant intentional.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Is TC Talks going to continue to be allowed to post slanderous statements?
GD autocorrect...MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 9:15 pmI think only Turkeytop could be capable of an international misleading statement unless you meant intentional.
I've edited the post leaving my initial mistake there.
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
Re: Is TC Talks going to continue to be allowed to post slanderous statements?
You must be the most anal person in the Western Hemisphere. WHO GIVES A FUCK?!? Like anyone cares about this shitshow? Even the moderator doesn't care about what goes on here, but you have to be the buzzboard police. Go have a couple, slam your wife, and you'll feel better
The censorship king from out of state.
-
- Posts: 6464
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Is TC Talks going to continue to be allowed to post slanderous statements?
For the record, I KNOW that Matt would never plot such an attack on the governor and is truly exercising his 1st amendment right. It's preposterous to assert everything else. That said, I could not disagree with him more on mask mandates.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
-
- Posts: 6464
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Is TC Talks going to continue to be allowed to post slanderous statements?
I mean I would be pretty pissed if someone claims I was a terrorist just as I have been previously with other libelous past statements that were made about me.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Is TC Talks going to continue to be allowed to post slanderous statements?
Interesting statement coming from the guy that started this thread: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=49491Honeyman wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 9:23 pmYou must be the most anal person in the Western Hemisphere. WHO GIVES A FUCK?!? Like anyone cares about this shitshow? Even the moderator doesn't care about what goes on here, but you have to be the buzzboard police. Go have a couple, slam your wife, and you'll feel better
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
Re: Is TC Talks going to continue to be allowed to post slanderous statements?
It would be nice if everyone remembered that attacking the idea is fair game. Attacking the person is not.
Debate 101
Of course, and unfortunately, many of our elected officials have forgotten this concept too. Don't they realize doing so makes you look like you haven't a valid argument against the idea?
Debate 101
Of course, and unfortunately, many of our elected officials have forgotten this concept too. Don't they realize doing so makes you look like you haven't a valid argument against the idea?
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
-
- Posts: 6464
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Is TC Talks going to continue to be allowed to post slanderous statements?
Good point.Bryce wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 9:37 pmIt would be nice if everyone remembered that attacking the idea is fair game. Attacking the person is not.
Debate 101
Of course, and unfortunately, many of our elected officials have forgotten this concept too. Don't they realize doing so makes you look like you haven't a valid argument against the idea?
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Is TC Talks going to continue to be allowed to post slanderous statements?
agreeBryce wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 9:37 pmIt would be nice if everyone remembered that attacking the idea is fair game. Attacking the person is not.
Debate 101
Of course, and unfortunately, many of our elected officials have forgotten this concept too. Don't they realize doing so makes you look like you haven't a valid argument against the idea?
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
Re: Is TC Talks going to continue to be allowed to post slanderous statements?
You support this President. It kind of opens you up to plenty of scrutiny.
I look at other Trump supporters denouncing his actions, but not you Matt. You call our Governor all kinds of offensive things. These attacks have nothing to do with their policies.
BTW, who exactly are you crying to? It sort of supports my premise that we have a pack of conservative victims in the forum.
I look at other Trump supporters denouncing his actions, but not you Matt. You call our Governor all kinds of offensive things. These attacks have nothing to do with their policies.
BTW, who exactly are you crying to? It sort of supports my premise that we have a pack of conservative victims in the forum.
“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Noam Chomsky
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
Re: Is TC Talks going to continue to be allowed to post slanderous statements?
Governor Whitmer EARNED every criticism Matt has lobbed at her.TC Talks wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 11:16 pmYou support this President. It kind of opens you up to plenty of scrutiny.
I look at other Trump supporters denouncing his actions, but not you Matt. You call our Governor all kinds of offensive things. These attacks have nothing to do with their policies.
BTW, who exactly are you crying to? It sort of supports my premise that we have a pack of conservative victims in the forum.
Show me the over 100 executive orders Trump had overturned by the Supreme Court and you might have a point.
Re: Is TC Talks going to continue to be allowed to post slanderous statements?
With a court that agrees with you, you don’t get many orders overturned. Just sayin. And the reality is that the emergency was cancelled and that ONE action cancelled the orders. You make it sound like they’ve ruled 100 times.bmw wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 11:42 pmGovernor Whitmer EARNED every criticism Matt has lobbed at her.TC Talks wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 11:16 pmYou support this President. It kind of opens you up to plenty of scrutiny.
I look at other Trump supporters denouncing his actions, but not you Matt. You call our Governor all kinds of offensive things. These attacks have nothing to do with their policies.
BTW, who exactly are you crying to? It sort of supports my premise that we have a pack of conservative victims in the forum.
Show me the over 100 executive orders Trump had overturned by the Supreme Court and you might have a point.
-
- Posts: 6464
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Is TC Talks going to continue to be allowed to post slanderous statements?
Bazinga!Rate This wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 11:55 pmWith a court that agrees with you, you don’t get many orders overturned. Just sayin. And the reality is that the emergency was cancelled and that ONE action cancelled the orders. You make it sound like they’ve ruled 100 times.bmw wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 11:42 pmGovernor Whitmer EARNED every criticism Matt has lobbed at her.TC Talks wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 11:16 pmYou support this President. It kind of opens you up to plenty of scrutiny.
I look at other Trump supporters denouncing his actions, but not you Matt. You call our Governor all kinds of offensive things. These attacks have nothing to do with their policies.
BTW, who exactly are you crying to? It sort of supports my premise that we have a pack of conservative victims in the forum.
Show me the over 100 executive orders Trump had overturned by the Supreme Court and you might have a point.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
-
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 12:10 pm
Re: Is TC Talks going to continue to be allowed to post slanderous statements?
We had somebody on the board who was harvesting IP addresses, and illegally using the LEIN database to identify posters for whatever nefarious reason. But he appears to be gone now, or under twilight sedation 24/7. And we have people here who are paranoid that someone is sharing their private posts. I wish those people would go the twilight sedation 24/7 route too.
As far as Trump goes, what has he really done that has hurt YOU personally? Is it that he is against abortion? Will somebody tell me why women just can't use less radical birth control to keep from getting pregnant instead of resorting to abortion every time they get pregnant? No woman should be forced to bear a baby that was conceived during rape. I make that exception. But some women in the entertainment industry are admitting to aborting four or more babies. One attractive blonde musical entertainer has admitted to having four abortions. Some were fathered by other famous musical entertainers. I think we should abort her CDs. But why do they have to wait until the baby is almost born, and in some cases born, before they murder it? What are they thinking?
As far as Trump goes, what has he really done that has hurt YOU personally? Is it that he is against abortion? Will somebody tell me why women just can't use less radical birth control to keep from getting pregnant instead of resorting to abortion every time they get pregnant? No woman should be forced to bear a baby that was conceived during rape. I make that exception. But some women in the entertainment industry are admitting to aborting four or more babies. One attractive blonde musical entertainer has admitted to having four abortions. Some were fathered by other famous musical entertainers. I think we should abort her CDs. But why do they have to wait until the baby is almost born, and in some cases born, before they murder it? What are they thinking?
Disagreeing with Communists is NOT an impeachable offense.
Never eat Sushi past its expiration date.
Those who refuse to drain the swamp are doomed to drown in it.
Never eat Sushi past its expiration date.
Those who refuse to drain the swamp are doomed to drown in it.