Some registered account users are experiencing password recognition issues. The issue appears to have been triggered by a PHP update last night. If this is occurring, please try logging in and using the "forgot password?" utility. Bear in mind auto-generated password reset emails may appear in your spam folder. If this does not work, please click the "Contact Us" option near the lower right hand corner of the index page to contact me via email.
Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.
Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.
Fake News thread
-
- Posts: 4509
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:09 pm
- Location: Brighton
Re: Fake News thread
Some are saying I ate the last custard donut in the breakroom. Fake news. The guy in the room before me ate it.
"Internet is no more like radio than intravenous feeding is like fine dining."
-TurkeyTop
-TurkeyTop
Re: Fake News thread
And how is that? Go ahead. Try me.Bryce wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:24 pmYour ramblings are constitutionally illiterate.NS8401 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 2:10 pmThe part about ambassadors and such was tossed out in 1898... nobody cares what the guy meant and that was 30 years after he meant it... if you want to go to original intent then you must use a gun made in 1790 in order to qualify for the second amendment protections you hold dear. No weapon made after that was intended for protection as it didn’t exist yet... do you really want to travel down this road and be obliterated with logic?Bryce wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 11:37 amAt first I said, "There is no SCOTUS ruling that grants birthright citizenship upon children of illegal aliens." I stand by that.Radio Sucks wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:32 am Just because I'm in the mood to be a troll today...
True - the ruling and the amendment were to solve problems with freed slaves. However, the 14th Amendment also states, and I quote - "Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article." Executive orders be damned!At first he said there was NO SCOTUS ruling, but minds have been changed as he wrote:Again, the SCOTUS ruling you cite pertained to foreign citizen's that are here legally. Like the former slaves were.
This will be fun to watch.
As far as enforcement, I point you to the ruling in City of Boerne v. Flores.Does it not make sense that one look to the original intent of the author of the Citizenship Clause when examining the 14th Amendment and citizenship? U.S. Senator from Michigan Jacob M. Howard (The Author), wrote:Congress may not enact legislation under Section 5 that substantively defines or interprets Fourteenth Amendment rights.
I further contend that being as enforcement of immigration law falls squarely on the Executive Branch and as such has plenary power, an Executive Order on this matter is certainly justifiable.This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States
These things change and evolve... that’s why the constitution is amendable at all... the founders knew that but apparently originalists called in sick or something... so in short no it does not make a lick of sense to go by something written 150 years ago by the mans intent... he isn’t here and we have to decide in the context of 2018 what’s going to happen not in the context of somebody who couldn’t comprehend the automobile or computers or planes or tanks or any of a million other things that are commonplace now... he’s outdated, outmoded and unfortunately pretty irrelevant now...
Re: Fake News thread
Ok, how's this? You're a fucking moron.NS8401 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 7:26 pmAnd how is that? Go ahead. Try me.Bryce wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:24 pmYour ramblings are constitutionally illiterate.NS8401 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 2:10 pmThe part about ambassadors and such was tossed out in 1898... nobody cares what the guy meant and that was 30 years after he meant it... if you want to go to original intent then you must use a gun made in 1790 in order to qualify for the second amendment protections you hold dear. No weapon made after that was intended for protection as it didn’t exist yet... do you really want to travel down this road and be obliterated with logic?Bryce wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 11:37 amAt first I said, "There is no SCOTUS ruling that grants birthright citizenship upon children of illegal aliens." I stand by that.Radio Sucks wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:32 am Just because I'm in the mood to be a troll today...
True - the ruling and the amendment were to solve problems with freed slaves. However, the 14th Amendment also states, and I quote - "Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article." Executive orders be damned!At first he said there was NO SCOTUS ruling, but minds have been changed as he wrote:Again, the SCOTUS ruling you cite pertained to foreign citizen's that are here legally. Like the former slaves were.
This will be fun to watch.
As far as enforcement, I point you to the ruling in City of Boerne v. Flores.Does it not make sense that one look to the original intent of the author of the Citizenship Clause when examining the 14th Amendment and citizenship? U.S. Senator from Michigan Jacob M. Howard (The Author), wrote:Congress may not enact legislation under Section 5 that substantively defines or interprets Fourteenth Amendment rights.
I further contend that being as enforcement of immigration law falls squarely on the Executive Branch and as such has plenary power, an Executive Order on this matter is certainly justifiable.This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States
These things change and evolve... that’s why the constitution is amendable at all... the founders knew that but apparently originalists called in sick or something... so in short no it does not make a lick of sense to go by something written 150 years ago by the mans intent... he isn’t here and we have to decide in the context of 2018 what’s going to happen not in the context of somebody who couldn’t comprehend the automobile or computers or planes or tanks or any of a million other things that are commonplace now... he’s outdated, outmoded and unfortunately pretty irrelevant now...
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
-
- Posts: 4509
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:09 pm
- Location: Brighton
Re: Fake News thread
The above statement is the "intolerant left", especially as when someone on the left is devoid of fact, they turn to insults.
Oh, shit, wait...
Oh, shit, wait...
"Internet is no more like radio than intravenous feeding is like fine dining."
-TurkeyTop
-TurkeyTop
Re: Fake News thread
Well said... I’m glad we’ve outed another closet leftist posing as a patriot around here...Mega Hertz wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 9:17 pm The above statement is the "intolerant left", especially as when someone on the left is devoid of fact, they turn to insults.
Oh, shit, wait...
We must save America from this scourge...
Apparently they get nasty when they have no rebuttal...
-
- Posts: 4509
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:09 pm
- Location: Brighton
Re: Fake News thread
I kid. I like Bryce. But I do that as an example. I called some right wingers "dingbats" (oh, the irony) on a Facebook status, and they got all butt-hurt. One guy said the exact same thing to me. Two days later, he got beat in an argument and resorted to name calling. I took a screenshot of his response and commented it right below his insult.
Haven't talked to him since.
Haven't talked to him since.
"Internet is no more like radio than intravenous feeding is like fine dining."
-TurkeyTop
-TurkeyTop
Re: Fake News thread
I guess I erred. I meant to put a smiley face on the name calling post. I said it with a smile and meant to be more of a jab than name calling.
When I have time, and energy, to rebut the nonsense you posted, I will.
When I have time, and energy, to rebut the nonsense you posted, I will.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: Fake News thread
I’m looking forward to it... sometimes I think this place is like a neighborhood bar... we even have a rotation of beers in another thread...