Some registered account users are experiencing password recognition issues. The issue appears to have been triggered by a PHP update last night. If this is occurring, please try logging in and using the "forgot password?" utility. Bear in mind auto-generated password reset emails may appear in your spam folder. If this does not work, please click the "Contact Us" option near the lower right hand corner of the index page to contact me via email.

Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
Post Reply
Deleted User 15783

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Unread post by Deleted User 15783 »

bmw wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 8:59 am Talk about flipping the bird to the Supreme Court. Such an EO won't stand up in Court. SCOTUS returned this decision to elected officials, not to the President via executive order.
And this is, in my opinion anyway, what is right about the Scotus decisions on both abortion and the EPA decision.
Make the elected officials do their job.
Top
User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 9236
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Unread post by audiophile »

Former Planned Parenthood clinic director: More would oppose abortion if they saw its 'barbarity'

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/forme ... ar-AAZpPFE

Wow this woman saw it all and switched sides.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Political Potpourri - U.S. and World”