Some registered account users are experiencing password recognition issues. The issue appears to have been triggered by a PHP update last night. If this is occurring, please try logging in and using the "forgot password?" utility. Bear in mind auto-generated password reset emails may appear in your spam folder. If this does not work, please click the "Contact Us" option near the lower right hand corner of the index page to contact me via email.

Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
Post Reply
User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 9236
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Unread post by audiophile »

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:09 pm
bmw wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:51 pm
Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:46 pm It has certainly been interesting. I think abortion should be legal to an extent and regulated. Today's ruling pushes it to the states, but leftist emo people seem to think it was made illegal today.
I think we as a nation need to figure out a standard for determining when life starts, and that said standard should apply to all 50 states. I don't like the idea of 50 different definitions of what constitutes a life.
Life begins at ejaculation, so stop jerking off.
Are you going to be charged with reckless abandonment? :rollin
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Top
User avatar
MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 7333
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Unread post by MotorCityRadioFreak »

audiophile wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:14 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:09 pm
bmw wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:51 pm
Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:46 pm It has certainly been interesting. I think abortion should be legal to an extent and regulated. Today's ruling pushes it to the states, but leftist emo people seem to think it was made illegal today.
I think we as a nation need to figure out a standard for determining when life starts, and that said standard should apply to all 50 states. I don't like the idea of 50 different definitions of what constitutes a life.
Life begins at ejaculation, so stop jerking off.
Are you going to be charged with reckless abandonment? :rollin
That goes for anyone who is "pro-life" and anti women. Live your values.
They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Top
User avatar
MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 7333
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Unread post by MotorCityRadioFreak »

You stupid fucks want to live like it's 1955, that means jerking off is bad again for you. No non pro creative sex. Clarence is doing the bed checks tonight.
They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Top
Matt
Posts: 11505
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Home of the National Champions

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Unread post by Matt »

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:20 pm You stupid fucks want to live like it's 1955, that means jerking off is bad again for you. No non pro creative sex. Clarence is doing the bed checks tonight.
Get a grip.
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account

"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
Top
User avatar
MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 7333
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Unread post by MotorCityRadioFreak »

Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:23 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:20 pm You stupid fucks want to live like it's 1955, that means jerking off is bad again for you. No non pro creative sex. Clarence is doing the bed checks tonight.
Get a grip.
You first. You voted for this shit.
They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Top
Matt
Posts: 11505
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Home of the National Champions

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Unread post by Matt »

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:33 pm
Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:23 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:20 pm You stupid fucks want to live like it's 1955, that means jerking off is bad again for you. No non pro creative sex. Clarence is doing the bed checks tonight.
Get a grip.
You first. You voted for this shit.
What shit? I'm happy with the outcome.
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account

"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
Top
Matt
Posts: 11505
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Home of the National Champions

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Unread post by Matt »

https://mobile.twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/st ... Tg8-AqAAAA

This person has deleted the tweet and wasn't even suspended.
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account

"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
Top
User avatar
MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 7333
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Unread post by MotorCityRadioFreak »

Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:28 pm https://mobile.twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/st ... Tg8-AqAAAA

This person has deleted the tweet and wasn't even suspended.
Autumn who? Who cares? She means nothing.

When you voted for DJT in 2016, you voted to strip away the rights of women. Dump chose this pathetic shit when he selected two CONS to the bench. You suck for aiding this.
They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Top
Matt
Posts: 11505
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Home of the National Champions

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Unread post by Matt »

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:35 pm
Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:28 pm https://mobile.twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/st ... Tg8-AqAAAA

This person has deleted the tweet and wasn't even suspended.
Autumn who? Who cares? She means nothing.

When you voted for DJT in 2016, you voted to strip away the rights of women. Dump chose this pathetic shit when he selected two CONS to the bench. You suck for aiding this.
I'll do this in a way you can understand: nO RIghTs wERe LosT tODaY.
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account

"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
Top
Matt
Posts: 11505
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Home of the National Champions

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Unread post by Matt »

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:35 pm
Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:28 pm https://mobile.twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/st ... Tg8-AqAAAA

This person has deleted the tweet and wasn't even suspended.
Autumn who? Who cares? She means nothing.

When you voted for DJT in 2016, you voted to strip away the rights of women. Dump chose this pathetic shit when he selected two CONS to the bench. You suck for aiding this.
Here's another racist lib for you: https://mobile.twitter.com/Asae/status/ ... yM3eAqAAAA
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account

"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
Top
User avatar
MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 7333
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Unread post by MotorCityRadioFreak »

No one cares what a few randos Tweeted.
They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Top
Matt
Posts: 11505
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Home of the National Champions

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Unread post by Matt »

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:58 pm No one cares what a few randos Tweeted.
They are representative of the emotional, racist left. There is no real support of diversity in the left. They support diverse people ONLY IF they ideologically agree with them. Otherwise, they are bigots to the worst degree.
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account

"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
Top
bmw
Posts: 7749
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:02 am

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Unread post by bmw »

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:35 pm When you voted for DJT in 2016...
Days like yesterday and today were precisely the reason I encouraged never-Trumpers back in 2016 to vote for Trump. Trump's presidency may have only lasted 4 years, but his legacy will last for decades through the Supreme Court.
Top
User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 9236
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Unread post by audiophile »

bmw wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:12 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:35 pm When you voted for DJT in 2016...
Days like yesterday and today were precisely the reason I encouraged never-Trumpers back in 2016 to vote for Trump. Trump's presidency may have only lasted 4 years, but his legacy will last for decades through the Supreme Court.
You were right, I just didn't believe he was serious. I did not vote for him in 2016. I don't think Matt did either.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Top
bmw
Posts: 7749
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:02 am

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Unread post by bmw »

audiophile wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:29 pm I just didn't believe he was serious.
I explicitly recall both you and Matt making similar comments at the time. My position was you KNOW what you'll get with Hillary. At least with Trump there's a chance you'll get what you want.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Political Potpourri - U.S. and World”