Some registered account users are experiencing password recognition issues. The issue appears to have been triggered by a PHP update last night. If this is occurring, please try logging in and using the "forgot password?" utility. Bear in mind auto-generated password reset emails may appear in your spam folder. If this does not work, please click the "Contact Us" option near the lower right hand corner of the index page to contact me via email.
Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.
Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
- audiophile
- Posts: 9236
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
Pinocchio was just on TV, claiming Thomas was trying undo contraception.
Rubbish, no one is trying overturn that!
Last edited by audiophile on Fri Jun 24, 2022 1:07 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
Wrong. That was EXACTLY what Thomas said:audiophile wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 12:57 pm
Pinocchio was just on TV, claiming Thomas was trying undo contraception.
Rubbish, no one is trying overturn that!
Thomas wrote, “In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell.”
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects the liberty of married couples to buy and use contraceptives without government restriction.
Last edited by Honeyman on Fri Jun 24, 2022 1:15 pm, edited 3 times in total.
The censorship king from out of state.
- audiophile
- Posts: 9236
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
Hey 2012 called
Again, no one is trying overturn that! You are dense today.
Biden just pulled a line from George Stephanopoulos' playbook.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pxyzAjk72U
Again, no one is trying overturn that! You are dense today.
Biden just pulled a line from George Stephanopoulos' playbook.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pxyzAjk72U
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 7333
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
Clarence Thomas also said as part of this ruling that non pro creative sex should be re evaluated. I hope you all enjoyed your BJ's because individual states now have the right to ban them. Fuck SCOTUS. Expand the court!
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
-
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 1:46 pm
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
Be careful what you wish for. Let’s say Biden uses his razor thin Democratic majority in Congress to pack the courts with left-wing ideologues until he gets a majority. Well, now there’s precedent for DeSantis (or another conservative) to use a razor thin Republican majority in Congress to pack the courts with conservative ideologues until he gets a majority in 2025. And so on and so forth. When does it end?
Obviously, this scenario is very unlikely to happen, as Biden doesn’t have the votes for this cycle to begin.
Obviously, this scenario is very unlikely to happen, as Biden doesn’t have the votes for this cycle to begin.
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
Don't get your panties in a wad. No other justice joined with Justice Thomas in that opinion. Ain't gonna happen.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:00 pm Clarence Thomas also said as part of this ruling that non pro creative sex should be re evaluated. I hope you all enjoyed your BJ's because individual states now have the right to ban them. Fuck SCOTUS. Expand the court!
Even if it did, and the state you lived in did ban sodomy, you're free to move to a state that allows nob gobbling to your hearts content.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
Typical overly emotional leftist.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:00 pm Clarence Thomas also said as part of this ruling that non pro creative sex should be re evaluated. I hope you all enjoyed your BJ's because individual states now have the right to ban them. Fuck SCOTUS. Expand the court!
Fuck the SCOTUS for following the constitution? That makes zero sense...
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 7333
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
It already happened today, you dumb fuck. Non pro creative sex is banned.Bryce wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:28 pmDon't get your panties in a wad. No other justice joined with Justice Thomas in that opinion. Ain't gonna happen.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:00 pm Clarence Thomas also said as part of this ruling that non pro creative sex should be re evaluated. I hope you all enjoyed your BJ's because individual states now have the right to ban them. Fuck SCOTUS. Expand the court!
Even if it did, and the state you lived in did ban sodomy, you're free to move to a state that allows nob gobbling to your hearts content.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
BJ's and butt banging have been banned? Where?MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:00 pmIt already happened today, you dumb fuck. Non pro creative sex is banned.Bryce wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:28 pmDon't get your panties in a wad. No other justice joined with Justice Thomas in that opinion. Ain't gonna happen.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:00 pm Clarence Thomas also said as part of this ruling that non pro creative sex should be re evaluated. I hope you all enjoyed your BJ's because individual states now have the right to ban them. Fuck SCOTUS. Expand the court!
Even if it did, and the state you lived in did ban sodomy, you're free to move to a state that allows nob gobbling to your hearts content.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
Abortion wasn't even banned. Quit being an overly emotional victim.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:00 pmIt already happened today, you dumb fuck. Non pro creative sex is banned.Bryce wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:28 pmDon't get your panties in a wad. No other justice joined with Justice Thomas in that opinion. Ain't gonna happen.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:00 pm Clarence Thomas also said as part of this ruling that non pro creative sex should be re evaluated. I hope you all enjoyed your BJ's because individual states now have the right to ban them. Fuck SCOTUS. Expand the court!
Even if it did, and the state you lived in did ban sodomy, you're free to move to a state that allows nob gobbling to your hearts content.
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 7333
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
I'm saving this for November.Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:10 pmAbortion wasn't even banned. Quit being an overly emotional victim.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:00 pmIt already happened today, you dumb fuck. Non pro creative sex is banned.Bryce wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:28 pmDon't get your panties in a wad. No other justice joined with Justice Thomas in that opinion. Ain't gonna happen.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:00 pm Clarence Thomas also said as part of this ruling that non pro creative sex should be re evaluated. I hope you all enjoyed your BJ's because individual states now have the right to ban them. Fuck SCOTUS. Expand the court!
Even if it did, and the state you lived in did ban sodomy, you're free to move to a state that allows nob gobbling to your hearts content.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
Looking forward to the red tsunami?MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:20 pmI'm saving this for November.Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:10 pmAbortion wasn't even banned. Quit being an overly emotional victim.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:00 pmIt already happened today, you dumb fuck. Non pro creative sex is banned.Bryce wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:28 pmDon't get your panties in a wad. No other justice joined with Justice Thomas in that opinion. Ain't gonna happen.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:00 pm Clarence Thomas also said as part of this ruling that non pro creative sex should be re evaluated. I hope you all enjoyed your BJ's because individual states now have the right to ban them. Fuck SCOTUS. Expand the court!
Even if it did, and the state you lived in did ban sodomy, you're free to move to a state that allows nob gobbling to your hearts content.
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 7333
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
When you say red tsunami, I don't think you realize what you are asking for.Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:34 pmLooking forward to the red tsunami?MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:20 pmI'm saving this for November.Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:10 pmAbortion wasn't even banned. Quit being an overly emotional victim.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:00 pmIt already happened today, you dumb fuck. Non pro creative sex is banned.Bryce wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:28 pmDon't get your panties in a wad. No other justice joined with Justice Thomas in that opinion. Ain't gonna happen.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:00 pm Clarence Thomas also said as part of this ruling that non pro creative sex should be re evaluated. I hope you all enjoyed your BJ's because individual states now have the right to ban them. Fuck SCOTUS. Expand the court!
Even if it did, and the state you lived in did ban sodomy, you're free to move to a state that allows nob gobbling to your hearts content.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 7333
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
It's all over. Gretchen is getting a second term as is Nessel. Women are going to come out and vote like their lives depend on it because it does.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
Big Republican wins.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:41 pmWhen you say red tsunami, I don't think you realize what you are asking for.Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:34 pmLooking forward to the red tsunami?MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:20 pmI'm saving this for November.Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:10 pmAbortion wasn't even banned. Quit being an overly emotional victim.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:00 pmIt already happened today, you dumb fuck. Non pro creative sex is banned.Bryce wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:28 pmDon't get your panties in a wad. No other justice joined with Justice Thomas in that opinion. Ain't gonna happen.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:00 pm Clarence Thomas also said as part of this ruling that non pro creative sex should be re evaluated. I hope you all enjoyed your BJ's because individual states now have the right to ban them. Fuck SCOTUS. Expand the court!
Even if it did, and the state you lived in did ban sodomy, you're free to move to a state that allows nob gobbling to your hearts content.
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw