The only idiocy I see here in the past few pages is coming from you, suggesting that the vast majority of abortions come as a result of either rape or of daddy leaving after the pregnancy is learned of. As I noted, even most pro-lifers are willing to concede exceptions for rape, and for the rest, the sex was CONSENSUAL. That means the woman did have a choice. Whether the father walked away is irrelevant - she should have pondered that possibility before the pants came off. You know, maybe if the father had more input legally (or really any input whatsoever) into whether the child comes to birth or not, maybe I would attach more responsibility to them. But the way it stands now, women have all the say. Thus, they also hold most of the responsibility.
Some registered account users are experiencing password recognition issues. The issue appears to have been triggered by a PHP update last night. If this is occurring, please try logging in and using the "forgot password?" utility. Bear in mind auto-generated password reset emails may appear in your spam folder. If this does not work, please click the "Contact Us" option near the lower right hand corner of the index page to contact me via email.
Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.
Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.
Roe v. Wade on the verge of being overturned?
Re: Roe v. Wade on the verge of being overturned?
Re: Roe v. Wade on the verge of being overturned?
It's a man crush baby!
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
- audiophile
- Posts: 9236
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Roe v. Wade on the verge of being overturned?
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
- audiophile
- Posts: 9236
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Roe v. Wade on the verge of being overturned?
Democrats generally are the extremists on this issue. Asking a political "leader" where they draw the line is not an unreasonable question. Up until birth is untenable.
Who are the extremists? Democrats refuse to say if they'd put any limits on abortion.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/ ... ar-AAXBT8d
USA Today link.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Re: Roe v. Wade on the verge of being overturned?
Why do you keep coming back when nobody wants you here?renu60 wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 9:20 am Thankfully, in 2022, abortion is unjustifiable and morally unconscionable.
Everyone knows it’s all human and all living.
If an embryo were found on Mars, nobody would say, “Oh, look! A clump of cells!” The headlines would be “Undeniable proof of life on Mars,” and they would be correct.
It’s also not “a woman’s body.” A woman doesn’t have 20 fingers and 20 toes. The body inside “her body” is not “her body.” Siamese twins aren’t allowed to kill the other person joined to them. They are two distinct people.
I challenge anyone to come up with a logical, moral, and coherent argument supporting abortion, ‘cause “coat hangers” aren’t cutting it.
The censorship king from out of state.
- audiophile
- Posts: 9236
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Roe v. Wade on the verge of being overturned?
You don't have to worry about a good response. They don't have one, so they will move to Plan B and go for your larynx.renu60 wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 9:20 am Thankfully, in 2022, abortion is unjustifiable and morally unconscionable.
Everyone knows it’s all human and all living.
If an embryo were found on Mars, nobody would say, “Oh, look! A clump of cells!” The headlines would be “Undeniable proof of life on Mars,” and they would be correct.
It’s also not “a woman’s body.” A woman doesn’t have 20 fingers and 20 toes. The body inside “her body” is not “her body.” Siamese twins aren’t allowed to kill the other person joined to them. They are two distinct people.
I challenge anyone to come up with a logical, moral, and coherent argument supporting abortion, ‘cause “coat hangers” aren’t cutting it.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Re: Roe v. Wade on the verge of being overturned?
He's not making an argument. He's asking you a question. Why do you keep coming back after repeatedly being banned? It is a question we have asked before and you have never answered.
You also refuse to tell us what led to the original ban.
- audiophile
- Posts: 9236
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Roe v. Wade on the verge of being overturned?
I guess MW has choice between being a Dorsey or a Musk.
I say if it's not illegal, then let it go...
Anything less than that just shows intellectual weakness, IMHO.
I say if it's not illegal, then let it go...
Anything less than that just shows intellectual weakness, IMHO.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Re: Roe v. Wade on the verge of being overturned?
We don't know whether the speech was legal or not as nobody has yet commented (that I've seen) on the reason for the original ban.
And in all fairness to MW - this place is about as laissez faire as internet forums come.
And in all fairness to MW - this place is about as laissez faire as internet forums come.
Re: Roe v. Wade on the verge of being overturned?
You're relatively new here, ITB, so maybe you don't know the history of this person. If you check out the DBR, you will see posts from lovinlife, bidengirl, reagan4prez, etc. These are all the same individual. This person has been banned multiple times for various slurs and previous posts. They will be banned again shortly.In The Bleachers wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 11:03 amI myself agree with much of what rue60 said. Saying no one wants her here would be incorrect.
The censorship king from out of state.
Re: Roe v. Wade on the verge of being overturned?
I think ITB is the poster formerly known as "Mike Oxshort."Honeyman wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 11:16 amYou're relatively new here, ITB, so maybe you don't know the history of this person. If you check out the DBR, you will see posts from lovinlife, bidengirl, reagan4prez, etc. These are all the same individual. This person has been banned multiple times for various slurs and previous posts. They will be banned again shortly.In The Bleachers wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 11:03 amI myself agree with much of what rue60 said. Saying no one wants her here would be incorrect.
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
Re: Roe v. Wade on the verge of being overturned?
I can't keep anyone straight anymore. Except for lovinlife who reveals itself in 1 post.Matt wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 11:19 amI think ITB is the poster formerly known as "Mike Oxshort."Honeyman wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 11:16 amYou're relatively new here, ITB, so maybe you don't know the history of this person. If you check out the DBR, you will see posts from lovinlife, bidengirl, reagan4prez, etc. These are all the same individual. This person has been banned multiple times for various slurs and previous posts. They will be banned again shortly.In The Bleachers wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 11:03 amI myself agree with much of what rue60 said. Saying no one wants her here would be incorrect.
The censorship king from out of state.
Re: Roe v. Wade on the verge of being overturned?
Okay. Yeah, I'm just getting up to speed here.Honeyman wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 11:16 am You're relatively new here, ITB, so maybe you don't know the history of this person. If you check out the DBR, you will see posts from lovinlife, bidengirl, reagan4prez, etc. These are all the same individual. This person has been banned multiple times for various slurs and previous posts. They will be banned again shortly.
I read subsequent posts after renu60 and figured there is something else going on.
Re: Roe v. Wade on the verge of being overturned?
I have received a spamming or abusive email from someone on this board!
We are sorry to hear that. The email form feature of this board includes safeguards to try and track users who send such posts, so email the board administrator with a full copy of the email you received. It is very important that this includes the headers that contain the details of the user that sent the email. The board administrator can then take action.
The censorship king from out of state.