Some registered account users are experiencing password recognition issues. The issue appears to have been triggered by a PHP update last night. If this is occurring, please try logging in and using the "forgot password?" utility. Bear in mind auto-generated password reset emails may appear in your spam folder. If this does not work, please click the "Contact Us" option near the lower right hand corner of the index page to contact me via email.

Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.

Kim Potter: guilty

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
Post Reply
User avatar
craig11152
Posts: 2201
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:15 am
Location: Ann Arbor

Re: Kim Potter: guilty

Unread post by craig11152 »

Notice all those "police apologists" aren't out rioting, burning and looting because they may disagree with the verdict.
I no longer directly engage Rate This :lol
Top
User avatar
kager
Posts: 1473
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:10 pm
Location: GPS lost

Re: Kim Potter: guilty

Unread post by kager »

Ah, another Being Pro Police thread to end the year, and perhaps the account.

Can't wait to see 'Mr. White Christmas'' acrid response to this.

He definitely needs to drink egg nog and eat some beef, and pass it to the missus...
"Enjoy every sandwich."
Top
User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7178
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Kim Potter: guilty

Unread post by Bryce »

Yup. The "police apologists" are out in full force on this...
The jury’s conviction of Minnesota police officer Kim Potter for the death of Daunte Wright, coupled with the judge’s denial of bail pending her appeal, is a double injustice with dangerous implications for policing in America.
According to ultra right wing conservative Alan Dershowitz. :roll:

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/5 ... conviction
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Top
User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 9236
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Kim Potter: guilty

Unread post by audiophile »

I'm not anti-police, but involuntary manslaughter probably is appropriate in this instance.

I support a suspended sentence, however.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Top
User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7178
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Kim Potter: guilty

Unread post by Bryce »

audiophile wrote: ↑Mon Dec 27, 2021 12:55 pm I'm not anti-police, but involuntary manslaughter probably is appropriate in this instance.

I support a suspended sentence, however.
I could be on board with involuntary manslaughter, but Keith Ellison the former leftist activist and DNC chair, chose to charge first-degree and second-degree manslaughter. That's a whole different ball game.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Top
User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 9236
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Kim Potter: guilty

Unread post by audiophile »

That should be overturned.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Top
User avatar
craig11152
Posts: 2201
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:15 am
Location: Ann Arbor

Re: Kim Potter: guilty

Unread post by craig11152 »

I do think she was overcharged but 12 jurors thought otherwise.
I no longer directly engage Rate This :lol
Top
User avatar
craig11152
Posts: 2201
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:15 am
Location: Ann Arbor

Re: Kim Potter: guilty

Unread post by craig11152 »

As far as I know they need grounds for an appeal. You can't just appeal a verdict you don't like.
What sort of grounds are they pressing or suggesting?
I no longer directly engage Rate This :lol
Top
User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7178
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Kim Potter: guilty

Unread post by Bryce »

craig11152 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 28, 2021 11:31 am As far as I know they need grounds for an appeal. You can't just appeal a verdict you don't like.
What sort of grounds are they pressing or suggesting?
Read the Dershowitz column I linked to above. He lays out several reasons for appeal.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Political Potpourri - U.S. and World”