Some registered account users are experiencing password recognition issues. The issue appears to have been triggered by a PHP update last night. If this is occurring, please try logging in and using the "forgot password?" utility. Bear in mind auto-generated password reset emails may appear in your spam folder. If this does not work, please click the "Contact Us" option near the lower right hand corner of the index page to contact me via email.

Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.

Retro TV WHNE

Discussion pertaining to Detroit, Ann Arbor, Port Huron and SW Ontario
User avatar
Splouge
Posts: 387
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 2:34 pm

Re: Retro TV WHNE

Unread post by Splouge »

CK-722 wrote: Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:10 pm My advice is, only worry about feeding your main TV. No splitters. The LEAST loss from a splitter is 3.5 dB. Many splitters are even worse. Put up a second antenna a few wavelengths away for another TV.
I used the splitter to simulate the future power decrease, so I could see if I'd be able to receive them.

They're currently running at 6.5 kW, but that will end when their STA expires, and they decrease to 3 kW.
"Wanna watch some syndicated slop with very little budget or entertainment value? You got it buddy!"

-Byron "The Broadcast Butcher" Allen
SixPlusOne
Posts: 353
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:03 am

Re: Retro TV WHNE

Unread post by SixPlusOne »

windsor wrote: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:18 pmToo bad a lot of the metro cant receive it now...………
I could never get it before but now I can get all of their channels.

WHNE-LD


https://fccdata.org/?lang=en&appid=2507 ... cid=168737
User avatar
windsor
Posts: 588
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 8:27 pm
Location: In OZZy"s BoneYard.....

Re: Retro TV WHNE

Unread post by windsor »

Splouge wrote: Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:17 pm
CK-722 wrote: Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:10 pm My advice is, only worry about feeding your main TV. No splitters. The LEAST loss from a splitter is 3.5 dB. Many splitters are even worse. Put up a second antenna a few wavelengths away for another TV.
I used the splitter to simulate the future power decrease, so I could see if I'd be able to receive them.

They're currently running at 6.5 kW, but that will end when their STA expires, and they decrease to 3 kW.
That's the issue with trying to find the right low vhf antenna, will a 30/40 mile range still work with the power decrease??

Who's going to screw around with this kind of nonsense?? Better to wait until the power decrease, more issues to arise for the few getting the signal right now.Not a good scenario for WHNE.
F**K Trudeau and F**K CBC !!!!
CK-722
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:53 pm

Re: Retro TV WHNE

Unread post by CK-722 »

Who's going to screw around with this kind of nonsense?? Better to wait until the power decrease, more issues to arise for the few getting the signal right now.Not a good scenario for WHNE.
The geeks on this board.

They might file for an extension of the STA if they can.

You can easily get 10-15 dB gain over rabbit ears with 20 foot outdoor antenna. That's like increasing the power by 10-31.6.
Last edited by CK-722 on Sat Apr 04, 2020 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Is THAT where they got the idea for the 486-SX?

Same (x, y, z), different (t)

Your bullet missed my trial balloon.

RTN Price. Not guaranteed. As of 12:30, 157.71 Down 0.22.

Artificial Intelligence is a Child that needs a Parent to guide it through.
User avatar
windsor
Posts: 588
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 8:27 pm
Location: In OZZy"s BoneYard.....

Re: Retro TV WHNE

Unread post by windsor »

CK-722 wrote: Sat Apr 04, 2020 4:10 pm
Who's going to screw around with this kind of nonsense?? Better to wait until the power decrease, more issues to arise for the few getting the signal right now.Not a good scenario for WHNE.
The geeks on this board.

They might file for an extension of the STA if they can.
:lol :rollin
F**K Trudeau and F**K CBC !!!!
User avatar
Splouge
Posts: 387
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 2:34 pm

Re: Retro TV WHNE

Unread post by Splouge »

windsor wrote: Sat Apr 04, 2020 3:33 pm
Splouge wrote: Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:17 pm
CK-722 wrote: Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:10 pm My advice is, only worry about feeding your main TV. No splitters. The LEAST loss from a splitter is 3.5 dB. Many splitters are even worse. Put up a second antenna a few wavelengths away for another TV.
I used the splitter to simulate the future power decrease, so I could see if I'd be able to receive them.

They're currently running at 6.5 kW, but that will end when their STA expires, and they decrease to 3 kW.
That's the issue with trying to find the right low vhf antenna, will a 30/40 mile range still work with the power decrease??

Who's going to screw around with this kind of nonsense?? Better to wait until the power decrease, more issues to arise for the few getting the signal right now.Not a good scenario for WHNE.
I can screw around with splitters and pre-amps because my setup is indoors, I distribute the antenna in the only north facing room of my house to my south facing living room.

After the decrease, the 55 dBu contour should work for indoor antennas, 35 dBu for outdoor


To calculate the field strength at your location, here are some resources:

https://www.fcc.gov/media/radio/fm-and- ... ion-curves (calculator, select (50,90), FM or 2 to 6, and field strength by distance in km. HAAT is 147.12 m)

*The antenna pattern: https://www.rabbitears.info/pattern.php ... =315&erp=3
Last edited by Splouge on Sat Apr 04, 2020 4:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Wanna watch some syndicated slop with very little budget or entertainment value? You got it buddy!"

-Byron "The Broadcast Butcher" Allen
CK-722
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:53 pm

Re: Retro TV WHNE

Unread post by CK-722 »

They also have an MOD for 6.5 kW filed which is pending.

I agree they have really done a number on the station though.
Last edited by CK-722 on Sat Apr 04, 2020 4:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Is THAT where they got the idea for the 486-SX?

Same (x, y, z), different (t)

Your bullet missed my trial balloon.

RTN Price. Not guaranteed. As of 12:30, 157.71 Down 0.22.

Artificial Intelligence is a Child that needs a Parent to guide it through.
User avatar
Splouge
Posts: 387
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 2:34 pm

Re: Retro TV WHNE

Unread post by Splouge »

CK-722 wrote: Sat Apr 04, 2020 4:18 pm They have an MOD for 6.5 kW filed which is pending.
That mod is nearly 10 months old, it's basically dead
Last edited by Splouge on Sat Apr 04, 2020 4:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Wanna watch some syndicated slop with very little budget or entertainment value? You got it buddy!"

-Byron "The Broadcast Butcher" Allen
CK-722
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:53 pm

Re: Retro TV WHNE

Unread post by CK-722 »

Here's what has been applied for so far:

https://www.fccdata.org/?facid=&call=WH ... d=&lang=en

I misspoke, it's a MOD CP.
Is THAT where they got the idea for the 486-SX?

Same (x, y, z), different (t)

Your bullet missed my trial balloon.

RTN Price. Not guaranteed. As of 12:30, 157.71 Down 0.22.

Artificial Intelligence is a Child that needs a Parent to guide it through.
User avatar
windsor
Posts: 588
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 8:27 pm
Location: In OZZy"s BoneYard.....

Re: Retro TV WHNE

Unread post by windsor »

here's a VHF low/high combo from Solid Signal in Novi, might work for a lot of you...…


https://www.solidsignal.com/pview.asp?p=ANT3037XR
F**K Trudeau and F**K CBC !!!!
User avatar
windsor
Posts: 588
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 8:27 pm
Location: In OZZy"s BoneYard.....

Re: Retro TV WHNE

Unread post by windsor »

just a thought here.....

If WUDT stays at rf23 maybe WHNE could move into the RF8 slot OR add Daystar to their channel lineup for free and relocate to RF8.

Any one????
F**K Trudeau and F**K CBC !!!!
User avatar
Splouge
Posts: 387
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 2:34 pm

Re: Retro TV WHNE

Unread post by Splouge »

Maybe something could happen with WWJ TV. CBS's ratings never recovered after the 94 realignment, and if WHNE let WWJ air a HD simulcast of 62.1 on one of 3's subchannels (transmitted from 62's transmitter, for coverage and bandwidth purposes, while still being licensed as a WHNE subchannel), WHNE could get money from CBS and broadcast some of their channels on WWJ's transmitter, some on WKBD's transmitter, and some on the VHF 3 signal (hopefully the infomercial channels would be the only ones on VHF 3, of course it wouldn't make any difference to me)

62.1 would remain so it could be licensed as WWJ, full powered, and keeping cable coverage.

WUDT is a low power station with no immediate co channel interference in the area, they have til July to move.

If WHNE were to share with WUDT, they could only put 6 of their channels on there, unless WUDT wanted to downgrade to SD.

Ultimately, you can't control what WHNE does, you can only control what you do, you can change your antenna, but you can't change WHNE's frequency
"Wanna watch some syndicated slop with very little budget or entertainment value? You got it buddy!"

-Byron "The Broadcast Butcher" Allen
CK-722
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:53 pm

Re: Retro TV WHNE

Unread post by CK-722 »

You could just mount a set of rabbit ears outside at some moderate height. You'd get a substantial increase in signal.
Is THAT where they got the idea for the 486-SX?

Same (x, y, z), different (t)

Your bullet missed my trial balloon.

RTN Price. Not guaranteed. As of 12:30, 157.71 Down 0.22.

Artificial Intelligence is a Child that needs a Parent to guide it through.
User avatar
Splouge
Posts: 387
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 2:34 pm

Re: Retro TV WHNE

Unread post by Splouge »

CK-722 wrote: Sat Apr 04, 2020 7:41 pm You could just mount a set of rabbit ears outside at some moderate height. You'd get a substantial increase in signal.
Nope, not sturdy enough. The rods are not made of the same sturdy thick metal that outdoor VHF yagis are. They'd snap off in the wind.
"Wanna watch some syndicated slop with very little budget or entertainment value? You got it buddy!"

-Byron "The Broadcast Butcher" Allen
Post Reply