Not asking for it both ways. With the DNC, the crime was clearly perpetrated against them. (I don't know enough about Feinstein to address it). In the Trump case, the FBI had no way of knowing how far up the ladder the malfeasance was, thus the investigation.Bryce wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 3:01 pmCan't have. It both ways Lester. It is maintained that the campaign wasn't being spied on, but certain individuals were. If individuals attached to the campaign were thought to be involved with Russian operatives, the FBI had a duty to inform the campaign.
Just like they informed the DNC about hacking and Diane FrankenFienstien about her hired help.
My statement still holds. Why on earth would the FBI compromise an investigation by informing the principle of the organization being looked at that THEY ARE BEING LOOKED AT?????? If you want to call that spying, have at it. Makes as much sense as setting up an surveillance van in front of a drug lord's house with "I ❤ The FBI" bumper stickers on it.