Some registered account users are experiencing password recognition issues. The issue appears to have been triggered by a PHP update last night. If this is occurring, please try logging in and using the "forgot password?" utility. Bear in mind auto-generated password reset emails may appear in your spam folder. If this does not work, please click the "Contact Us" option near the lower right hand corner of the index page to contact me via email.
Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.
Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.
Numbers
-
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 1:46 pm
Re: Numbers
It makes sense. The other station playing Christmas songs foolishly changed formats halfway through the survey. Will be interesting to see what share they end up with in the Holiday book.
-
- Posts: 3169
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 2:08 pm
- Location: Novi, MI
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 3169
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 2:08 pm
- Location: Novi, MI
- Contact:
Re: Numbers
DRQ needs to flip honestly. Their 2 share ratings are getting really old. It's not even fun laughing at them anymore.
Music is my life.
Re: Numbers
Anyone else surprised by WORDS good showing? Figured they would falter post election
-
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2019 4:39 am
Re: Numbers
There isn't much for them to flip to, unfortunately. They can't go back to variety hits (whether that's "Doug" part 2 or "Jack"), and there isn't much else they can choose from. Can't do any form of rock, can't do rhythmic AC; they can't do much of really anything short of simulcasting 760 -- and that's if they do flip.stopnswop2 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 7:42 pm DRQ needs to flip honestly. Their 2 share ratings are getting really old. It's not even fun laughing at them anymore.
As much as I might hate it, 93.1 is probably going to stay country for at least the short term.
take this job and shove it
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 7333
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Numbers
Why not go back to Doug? I might listen then.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Numbers
I bet they would pull above a two share doing a Duke classic country format. Between the two Canadian options and WYCD there are too many current country stations on the FM dial.
-
- Posts: 3169
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 2:08 pm
- Location: Novi, MI
- Contact:
Re: Numbers
As far as I remember, Doug FM's ratings were not bad. Cumulus just picked their lowest performing station to bring NASH to Detroit.
Why not flip back? Why not Soft AC or even Classic Hits, to compete with WOMC?
96.3 now a days is the farthest from away from a traditional AC that it's almost a different format, so there will be no self competition.
Why not flip back? Why not Soft AC or even Classic Hits, to compete with WOMC?
96.3 now a days is the farthest from away from a traditional AC that it's almost a different format, so there will be no self competition.
Music is my life.
- craig11152
- Posts: 2201
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:15 am
- Location: Ann Arbor
Re: Numbers
97.1 dropped out of the top 10 and behind WJR.
Since Valenti is the Matthew Stafford (quarterback) of the station I demand they trade...errr....fire him.
Since Valenti is the Matthew Stafford (quarterback) of the station I demand they trade...errr....fire him.
I no longer directly engage Rate This
- scifi and horror
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2020 7:21 am
Re: Numbers
Dropped out of the top 10 because WDMK-FM is listed for 7, 8, and 9.craig11152 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 25, 2020 9:07 am 97.1 dropped out of the top 10 and behind WJR.
Since Valenti is the Matthew Stafford (quarterback) of the station I demand they trade...errr....fire him.
Re: Numbers
Some of you act like flipping a radio station is as easy as flipping pancakes. It’s a very costly and risky endeavor. And as we have witnessed over and over again in this market, if done haphazardly it’ll end up being a dog especially when faced with stiff competition. The last actual successful flip was The Bounce and they screwed that up by not being prepared for the impact the station would have on the market. They were the talk of not only the D but the entire industry. But they underestimated big time. It took them forever to staff up. They had a weak street presence. And the music got stale quickly. Honestly, it was sad to watch a station that should still be in the top 5 and #1 18-49 tank.
What kills me about the current state of head to head radio battles, like Nash vs. ‘YCD, is the lack of attention to detail and the unwillingness to make changes based on what should be obvious. A few tweaks here or there in talent, presentation, music, imaging, sound quality, might actually make your stick more competitive. There’s no need to flip a format. Sadly, radio programming has gotten lazy, stale, and downright awful.
Nash is better off staying the course and sticking to it’s mission of keeping ‘YCD in check and hoping for some luck from the radio Gods known as Nielsen. String a few surveys together and you never know.
What kills me about the current state of head to head radio battles, like Nash vs. ‘YCD, is the lack of attention to detail and the unwillingness to make changes based on what should be obvious. A few tweaks here or there in talent, presentation, music, imaging, sound quality, might actually make your stick more competitive. There’s no need to flip a format. Sadly, radio programming has gotten lazy, stale, and downright awful.
Nash is better off staying the course and sticking to it’s mission of keeping ‘YCD in check and hoping for some luck from the radio Gods known as Nielsen. String a few surveys together and you never know.
-
- Posts: 4509
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:09 pm
- Location: Brighton
Re: Numbers
I've said it before here...there hasn't been an upstart in this market in a long time that has taken down the incumbent. Because of said lack of detail. They come on, play the same shit as the other guy, don't promote, don't spend, hang around or 2 or 3 share (at best), don't research...and then in 2 years, they repeat the process. With the stories I've heard about the WLLZ launch in 1980, I'd love to know more about it. And that WRIF podcast explains it better. Today? Just get the few ad dollars you can, clear a national show no one gives a fuck about, flip, rinse, repeat.
"Internet is no more like radio than intravenous feeding is like fine dining."
-TurkeyTop
-TurkeyTop