Some registered account users are experiencing password recognition issues. The issue appears to have been triggered by a PHP update last night. If this is occurring, please try logging in and using the "forgot password?" utility. Bear in mind auto-generated password reset emails may appear in your spam folder. If this does not work, please click the "Contact Us" option near the lower right hand corner of the index page to contact me via email.
Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.
Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.
WADL Tests on RF27
WADL Tests on RF27
Looks like the move is near of WADL from rf39 to its new repack home of rf27.Rescan to see the test on rf27 colour bars.
F**K Trudeau and F**K CBC !!!!
-
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:03 am
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:49 pm
Re: WADL Tests on RF27
Right now, WADL is the last Detroit TV station above RF 36.
Re: WADL Tests on RF27
Are they advertising a date when they'll turn off 39?
N4MJC
Comments are my own and not that of the FCC (my employer) or anyone else.
RabbitEars
"Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand..." - Rush "Witch Hunt"
Comments are my own and not that of the FCC (my employer) or anyone else.
RabbitEars
"Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand..." - Rush "Witch Hunt"
Re: WADL Tests on RF27
Actually, they're early. They were moved from phase 8 (which ended March 13) to phase 9 (which ends May 1)SixPlusOne wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:47 amDid a rescan and got em. Aren't they a little late to the party.
"Wanna watch some syndicated slop with very little budget or entertainment value? You got it buddy!"
-Byron "The Broadcast Butcher" Allen
-Byron "The Broadcast Butcher" Allen
Re: WADL Tests on RF27
Only one left is WUDT Daystar to go to rf8.
Allowing some of us to receive WNWO Toledo rf23.
Allowing some of us to receive WNWO Toledo rf23.
F**K Trudeau and F**K CBC !!!!
- audiophile
- Posts: 9236
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: WADL Tests on RF27
No lock for me. WADL has been a dud since they went digital.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Re: WADL Tests on RF27
WADL is now on RF 27
Re: WADL Tests on RF27
Rescanned and I'm picking it up just fine.
Re: WADL Tests on RF27
Pretty much a literal No Show in NW Det. Had a decent signal on RF39, just stutter and tiling on 27. This with an 8-bay screen array aimed at them.
(edit) OK on a couple of other sets w different antennas, Still NG on main set/antenna.
Might have to try re-aiming again, maybe replace lead-in coax.
Low priority as 38-1 is also available on cable, none of the OTA WADL subs have any appeal.
(edit) OK on a couple of other sets w different antennas, Still NG on main set/antenna.
Might have to try re-aiming again, maybe replace lead-in coax.
Low priority as 38-1 is also available on cable, none of the OTA WADL subs have any appeal.
Re: WADL Tests on RF27
Although you said it's low priority, I'd like to ask if you're using a pre amp, what antenna you're using, and what kind of coax (RG6 or RG59) you're using. Make sure the preamp is getting power and that the antenna is aimed at the tri-point where Clinton Twp., St. Clair Shores, and Fraser meet.SolarMax wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:21 am Pretty much a literal No Show in NW Det. Had a decent signal on RF39, just stutter and tiling on 27. This with an 8-bay screen array aimed at them.
(edit) OK on a couple of other sets w different antennas, Still NG on main set/antenna.
Might have to try re-aiming again, maybe replace lead-in coax.
Low priority as 38-1 is also available on cable, none of the OTA WADL subs have any appeal.
It's coming in fine using a Clearstream 2Max in Melvindale indoors.
"Wanna watch some syndicated slop with very little budget or entertainment value? You got it buddy!"
-Byron "The Broadcast Butcher" Allen
-Byron "The Broadcast Butcher" Allen
Re: WADL Tests on RF27
Not using a preamp, though I've tried using it. I'm somewhat close-in to WDIV, WXYZ, WWJ, WMYD, WTVS (& WHNE), so preamp provides way too much signal from the full-power stations, which causes its own set of problems. Antenna is XtremeSignal HDB8x screen 2x 4-bays with a hinged center, so one panel aimed toward Southfield, the other fairly accurately toward Clinton Twp., each panel supposedly has a 60˚ lobe so there's a bit of overlap. Using. Coax=RG6 approx 35 ft. Also combined into the array is a simple VHF dipole, for WJBK and CBET, which conveniently are approx 180˚ opposite each other. Hoping it will suffice for WHNE.Splouge wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 12:36 pm Although you said it's low priority, I'd like to ask if you're using a pre amp, what antenna you're using, and what kind of coax (RG6 or RG59) you're using. Make sure the preamp is getting power and that the antenna is aimed at the tri-point where Clinton Twp., St. Clair Shores, and Fraser meet.
It's coming in fine using a Clearstream 2Max in Melvindale indoors.
Re: WADL Tests on RF27
I'm copying WUDL gangbusters, while still no go (at least with this antenna) with WADL.MWmetalhead wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 8:15 pm Still no sign of WUDL when I run scans using my cheap $10 short rabbit ears / loop combo. I'll try with the flat panel antenna later in the week.
Re: WADL Tests on RF27
I’m near 14 mile and Woodward too and no WUDL...
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro