Some registered account users are experiencing password recognition issues. The issue appears to have been triggered by a PHP update last night. If this is occurring, please try logging in and using the "forgot password?" utility. Bear in mind auto-generated password reset emails may appear in your spam folder. If this does not work, please click the "Contact Us" option near the lower right hand corner of the index page to contact me via email.

Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.

Trump spoke to GOP official who now wants to 'rescind' vote to certify Detroit's results

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 16584
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Trump spoke to GOP official who now wants to 'rescind' vote to certify Detroit's results

Unread post by Rate This »

TheForce wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 12:12 pm Sorry, no backsies!

https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/19/politics ... index.html
Yeah... should have thought of that before voting to certify it. Too bad. This would be more worrisome if these people weren’t so incredibly bad at this...
Donald Trump… In your guts you know he’s nuts.
km1125
Posts: 3789
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: Trump spoke to GOP official who now wants to 'rescind' vote to certify Detroit's results

Unread post by km1125 »

Not ONE mention in the article about WHY there was any concern about certifying those boards. Why not?
User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 16584
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Trump spoke to GOP official who now wants to 'rescind' vote to certify Detroit's results

Unread post by Rate This »

km1125 wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 1:28 pm Not ONE mention in the article about WHY there was any concern about certifying those boards. Why not?
Because the concerns are unfounded and nobody in Trumps orbit can provide a shred of evidence beyond something they saw on social media. It’s put up or shut up time now.
Donald Trump… In your guts you know he’s nuts.
TC Shuts Up
Posts: 2313
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 12:10 pm

Re: Trump spoke to GOP official who now wants to 'rescind' vote to certify Detroit's results

Unread post by TC Shuts Up »

Middle Eastern politician threatens Wayne County canvasser, who rescinded approving, after threats, the fraudulent vote results in Wayne County under physical threat, with harm to her children at a Suburban Wayne County High School. It is thinly veiled, but a jury could see right through that it was a threat of physical violence or death to her children.

https://twitter.com/correctthemedia/sta ... 0357535744
Last edited by TC Shuts Up on Thu Nov 19, 2020 2:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Disagreeing with Communists is NOT an impeachable offense.

Never eat Sushi past its expiration date.

Those who refuse to drain the swamp are doomed to drown in it.
km1125
Posts: 3789
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: Trump spoke to GOP official who now wants to 'rescind' vote to certify Detroit's results

Unread post by km1125 »

Rate This wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 2:05 pm
km1125 wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 1:28 pm Not ONE mention in the article about WHY there was any concern about certifying those boards. Why not?
Because the concerns are unfounded and nobody in Trumps orbit can provide a shred of evidence beyond something they saw on social media. It’s put up or shut up time now.
How many sworn affidavits have there been already?
User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 16584
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Trump spoke to GOP official who now wants to 'rescind' vote to certify Detroit's results

Unread post by Rate This »

km1125 wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 2:28 pm
Rate This wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 2:05 pm
km1125 wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 1:28 pm Not ONE mention in the article about WHY there was any concern about certifying those boards. Why not?
Because the concerns are unfounded and nobody in Trumps orbit can provide a shred of evidence beyond something they saw on social media. It’s put up or shut up time now.
How many sworn affidavits have there been already?
Every case they’ve brought on this has been tossed. The folks bringing these cases misunderstand the process or are willfully deceptive about it. Put up or shut up. They’ve been promising evidence for weeks. Where is it?

Just because you have a sworn affidavit it doesn’t mean the person swearing what they say is true doesn’t misunderstand how something works.
Donald Trump… In your guts you know he’s nuts.
User avatar
Turkeytop
Posts: 9303
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:27 pm

Re: Trump spoke to GOP official who now wants to 'rescind' vote to certify Detroit's results

Unread post by Turkeytop »

So, if the Wayne County votes are tossed out, does Trump win Michigan?

If Trump wins Michigan , does he win Nationally?
User avatar
Honeyman
Posts: 6904
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:44 pm

Re: Trump spoke to GOP official who now wants to 'rescind' vote to certify Detroit's results

Unread post by Honeyman »

Turkeytop wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 7:06 pm So, if the Wayne County votes are tossed out, does Trump win Michigan?

If Trump wins Michigan , does he win Nationally?
They won't be.

No.
The censorship king from out of state.
Matt
Posts: 11505
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Home of the National Champions

Re: Trump spoke to GOP official who now wants to 'rescind' vote to certify Detroit's results

Unread post by Matt »

TheForce wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 12:12 pm Sorry, no backsies!

https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/19/politics ... index.html
Stick to things you know, like bitching about can and bottle returns.
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account

"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 16584
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Trump spoke to GOP official who now wants to 'rescind' vote to certify Detroit's results

Unread post by Rate This »

Matt wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 7:39 pm
TheForce wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 12:12 pm Sorry, no backsies!

https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/19/politics ... index.html
Stick to things you know, like bitching about can and bottle returns.
They don’t have the legal right to rescind their vote. A card laid is a card played.
Donald Trump… In your guts you know he’s nuts.
Matt
Posts: 11505
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Home of the National Champions

Re: Trump spoke to GOP official who now wants to 'rescind' vote to certify Detroit's results

Unread post by Matt »

Rate This wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 12:53 am
Matt wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 7:39 pm
TheForce wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 12:12 pm Sorry, no backsies!

https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/19/politics ... index.html
Stick to things you know, like bitching about can and bottle returns.
They don’t have the legal right to rescind their vote. A card laid is a card played.
They were assured there would be a proper audit and then Benson reneged. Their original vote to not certify should stand, using your logic.
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account

"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 16584
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Trump spoke to GOP official who now wants to 'rescind' vote to certify Detroit's results

Unread post by Rate This »

Matt wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 5:09 am
Rate This wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 12:53 am
Matt wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 7:39 pm
TheForce wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 12:12 pm Sorry, no backsies!

https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/19/politics ... index.html
Stick to things you know, like bitching about can and bottle returns.
They don’t have the legal right to rescind their vote. A card laid is a card played.
They were assured there would be a proper audit and then Benson reneged. Their original vote to not certify should stand, using your logic.
Thats not how that works. There’s no horse trading provision. They went down that road knowing full well the risks. They chose that road and got burned. Oh well.
Donald Trump… In your guts you know he’s nuts.
Matt
Posts: 11505
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Home of the National Champions

Re: Trump spoke to GOP official who now wants to 'rescind' vote to certify Detroit's results

Unread post by Matt »

Rate This wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 5:49 am
Matt wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 5:09 am
Rate This wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 12:53 am
Matt wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 7:39 pm
TheForce wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 12:12 pm Sorry, no backsies!

https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/19/politics ... index.html
Stick to things you know, like bitching about can and bottle returns.
They don’t have the legal right to rescind their vote. A card laid is a card played.
They were assured there would be a proper audit and then Benson reneged. Their original vote to not certify should stand, using your logic.
Thats not how that works. There’s no horse trading provision. They went down that road knowing full well the risks. They chose that road and got burned. Oh well.
Roughly 70% of 154 precincts didn't balance. Also, just under 30% of ballots can't even be reviewed. There is NO FUCKING WAY the results should have been certified.
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account

"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 16584
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Trump spoke to GOP official who now wants to 'rescind' vote to certify Detroit's results

Unread post by Rate This »

Matt wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 6:24 am
Rate This wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 5:49 am
Matt wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 5:09 am
Rate This wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 12:53 am
Matt wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 7:39 pm
TheForce wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 12:12 pm Sorry, no backsies!

https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/19/politics ... index.html
Stick to things you know, like bitching about can and bottle returns.
They don’t have the legal right to rescind their vote. A card laid is a card played.
They were assured there would be a proper audit and then Benson reneged. Their original vote to not certify should stand, using your logic.
Thats not how that works. There’s no horse trading provision. They went down that road knowing full well the risks. They chose that road and got burned. Oh well.
Roughly 70% of 154 precincts didn't balance. Also, just under 30% of ballots can't even be reviewed. There is NO FUCKING WAY the results should have been certified.
Do you understand what didn’t balance means? It was likely by just a few votes as in single to tens of votes. That’s absolutely no reason to hold anything up. Those sorts of anomalies happen every election and they get looked at and fixed. But if we are talking about a handful of votes with a large spread between the candidates then you’re talking about arguing a 5 yard run vs. a 6 yard run in a 70-10 blowout of Michigan by Ohio State. Come on man. Get over yourselves. Quit wasting everybody’s time with bullshit.
Donald Trump… In your guts you know he’s nuts.
Post Reply