Acceptable registrations in the queue through May 29 at 11:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

Humpty Dumpty 2016 version

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
screen glare
Posts: 2778
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:05 am

Humpty Dumpty 2016 version

Post by screen glare » Tue Nov 08, 2016 7:01 am

Trumpty Dumpty sat on a wall
Trumpty Dumpty had a great fall
All of Vlad's horses and all of Vlad's men
Couldn't put Trumpty together again


Today we the people finally dump Trump. It's election day, and the majority of us Americans will reject Trumpty Dumpty and his fear-based ideology. The voting booth will be our front line in his uncivil war defiling our beloved country. The pen IS mightier than the sword as we mark our ballots.

Trump falls today of his own vulgarity, disrespect, and unAmerican cowardice. The schoolyard bully will be expelled - his insulting and hurtful words stripped of power.

Let Freedom Ring - America IS great.



Y M Ionhere
Posts: 661
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 9:31 pm
Location: Where the sun no longer shines

Re: Humpty Dumpty 2016 version

Post by Y M Ionhere » Tue Nov 08, 2016 9:15 am

Never mind your girl Hillarys own deals with Russia.And her admission that she will manipulate and abuse the Constitution by selecting slanted, activist judges who want to try and re-interpret it to fit their agenda. Her animosity towards Catholics. Her campaigns referral of Latinos as "The Taco Vote". And calling her husbands campaign worker a "fucking jew bastard" probably isnt the least bit hateful either. And of course, bashing the police, which basically encourages more people to attack them or act out against them.

There are 2 pieces of human waste running. The toilet she swims in is the only one I will attempt to flush.

Deleted User 8570

Re: Humpty Dumpty 2016 version

Post by Deleted User 8570 » Tue Nov 08, 2016 9:54 am

Y M Ionhere wrote:Never mind your girl Hillarys own deals with Russia.And her admission that she will manipulate and abuse the Constitution by selecting slanted, activist judges who want to try and re-interpret it to fit their agenda. Her animosity towards Catholics. Her campaigns referral of Latinos as "The Taco Vote". And calling her husbands campaign worker a "fucking jew bastard" probably isnt the least bit hateful either. And of course, bashing the police, which basically encourages more people to attack them or act out against them.

There are 2 pieces of human waste running. The toilet she swims in is the only one I will attempt to flush.
Of course "activist" judges go back hundreds of years... but that's semantics right?

User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 8629
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Humpty Dumpty 2016 version

Post by audiophile » Tue Nov 08, 2016 10:33 am

I say a declaration of "unconstitutional" should be more than 5:4!
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!

screen glare
Posts: 2778
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:05 am

Re: Humpty Dumpty 2016 version

Post by screen glare » Tue Nov 08, 2016 11:13 am

Y M Ionhere - Y R Uonhere?

hahahahaha


If - as you state - the candidates are "two pieces of human waste" - but she is the only candidate you will attempt to flush - then it's clear you are bugged by the thought of a woman flying the passenger jet in which you are riding - symbolic of the powerful USA - traveling through our turbulent history.

Yes - Y M - it's that damn irritating female factor.

Because, buddy, you're more comfortable with an indelicate man covered in shit - than a woman smeared that way. Even though women are the chief butt wipers and diaper changers of this world - from nursery schools to nursing homes.

Y M - You'd better get used to shity, "nasty" American women at the helm of state - because that's reality, my friend. You've probably been blinded by too many air brushed fantasy images of women on your basement pornograph.

Re your other spun statements - "deals with Russia" not to Vlad-the-Invader's liking? "Activist judges" - like Scalia? "Animosity toward Catholics" - like her VP Tim Kaine? "The Taco Vote" - destroying Trump at the polls in droves? And on, and on, and on - thanks to your alt universe of conspiracies and those with axes to grind.

Deleted User 8570

Re: Humpty Dumpty 2016 version

Post by Deleted User 8570 » Tue Nov 08, 2016 11:54 am

audiophile wrote:I say a declaration of "unconstitutional" should be more than 5:4!
Considering the court declares things constitutional or unconstitutional based on a precedent I'd say the whole thing is really quite baseless. But that's how our courts are set up... majority rules just like an election. I'm sure you were plenty happy when the 5-4 votes were your way... now that the show is on the other foot...

User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 8629
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Humpty Dumpty 2016 version

Post by audiophile » Tue Nov 08, 2016 12:02 pm

Like what?

Maybe there shouldn't be precedent set on 5:4 decisions.

It settles the case before it but it has no bearing on lower courts - basically an "unpublished" decision.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!

Deleted User 8570

Re: Humpty Dumpty 2016 version

Post by Deleted User 8570 » Tue Nov 08, 2016 12:07 pm

audiophile wrote:Like what?

Maybe there shouldn't be precedent set on 5:4 decisions.

It settles the case before it but it has no bearing on lower courts - basically an "unpublished" decision.
I don't know... there have to be some...

User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 8629
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Humpty Dumpty 2016 version

Post by audiophile » Tue Nov 08, 2016 12:14 pm

Roe vs Wade - NOPE
Kelo v. City of New London - NOPE
Obamacare - NOPE
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!

Deleted User 8570

Re: Humpty Dumpty 2016 version

Post by Deleted User 8570 » Tue Nov 08, 2016 12:18 pm

audiophile wrote:Roe vs Wade - NOPE
Kelo v. City of New London - NOPE
Obamacare - NOPE
That's 3... how about Citizens United?

User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 8629
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Humpty Dumpty 2016 version

Post by audiophile » Tue Nov 08, 2016 1:49 pm

Doesn't matter to me.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!

Deleted User 8570

Re: Humpty Dumpty 2016 version

Post by Deleted User 8570 » Tue Nov 08, 2016 2:25 pm

audiophile wrote:Doesn't matter to me.
So the Supreme Court has done nothing you support in your lifetime?

Y M Ionhere
Posts: 661
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 9:31 pm
Location: Where the sun no longer shines

Re: Humpty Dumpty 2016 version

Post by Y M Ionhere » Tue Nov 08, 2016 8:42 pm

screen glare wrote:Y M Ionhere - Y R Uonhere?

hahahahaha


If - as you state - the candidates are "two pieces of human waste" - but she is the only candidate you will attempt to flush - then it's clear you are bugged by the thought of a woman flying the passenger jet in which you are riding - symbolic of the powerful USA - traveling through our turbulent history.

Yes - Y M - it's that damn irritating female factor.

Because, buddy, you're more comfortable with an indelicate man covered in shit - than a woman smeared that way. Even though women are the chief butt wipers and diaper changers of this world - from nursery schools to nursing homes.

Y M - You'd better get used to shity, "nasty" American women at the helm of state - because that's reality, my friend. You've probably been blinded by too many air brushed fantasy images of women on your basement pornograph.

Re your other spun statements - "deals with Russia" not to Vlad-the-Invader's liking? "Activist judges" - like Scalia? "Animosity toward Catholics" - like her VP Tim Kaine? "The Taco Vote" - destroying Trump at the polls in droves? And on, and on, and on - thanks to your alt universe of conspiracies and those with axes to grind.
Few things piss me off more than accusing someone of racism or sexism to score cheap political points. Typical lib. Paint your opponent as a bigot to win points without caring about the damage you do to an innocent persons reputation. How low is too low for you to sink?
I don't mind a woman being President. Just not this one. Her policies will not keep us safe or prosperous. Nothing sexist about that.
As far as the animosity toward Catholics, it was Kaine himself who said, during a rally, that if the church doesnt change its position on transgenderism, she could sign an executive order barring the church from the US. The leaked emails also show a dislike of Catholics.
And I do not have any airbrushed porn in my basement. I can respect any artistic talent, porn or otherwise. But I do not have a basement.
Thank you for your civilized, polite, mature response. Typical lib.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic