Wait a minute - so the Democrats can't want to "Dump Biden" for another candidate, but then still vote for him in the general if he gets the nomination?
Some registered account users are experiencing password recognition issues. The issue appears to have been triggered by a PHP update last night. If this is occurring, please try logging in and using the "forgot password?" utility. Bear in mind auto-generated password reset emails may appear in your spam folder. If this does not work, please click the "Contact Us" option near the lower right hand corner of the index page to contact me via email.
Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.
Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.
Matt will be happy - I'm now on the "dump Trump" bandwagon
Re: Matt will be happy - I'm now on the "dump Trump" bandwagon
Re: Matt will be happy - I'm now on the "dump Trump" bandwagon
Eastman is a pick I think he'd consider. I don't know which serious people would sign on again. It's probably a moot point unless the Dems bring the old hag back. Trump beat the hag, but he couldn't beat a vegetable.
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
Re: Matt will be happy - I'm now on the "dump Trump" bandwagon
You bullshit opening statement in this thread says, "I've had enough" not once, but twice. Obviously, you haven't.
The censorship king from out of state.
Re: Matt will be happy - I'm now on the "dump Trump" bandwagon
Having had enough of Trump and voting for him over an en even worse Democrat are not mutually exclusive events. Your suggestion is that if Trump gets the nomination, I should either outright vote for what I view as an even worse candidate running with the party which I've had more than enough of for a decade and a half or should vote 3rd party or stay home. That's an absurd suggestion.Honeyman wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 9:36 amYou bullshit opening statement in this thread says, "I've had enough" not once, but twice. Obviously, you haven't.
And I know why you refuse to answer my question. It is because there's no such thing as a Democrat voter having had enough of any specific Democrat politician. You all can mildly piss and moan about how Biden or Clinton have been in politics too long, or how you want younger candidates, but at the end of the day, you will ALWAYS, WITHOUT FAIL, vote for the candidate with the (D) after their name. So lets not pretend to play moral superiority games here.
- craig11152
- Posts: 2201
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:15 am
- Location: Ann Arbor
Re: Matt will be happy - I'm now on the "dump Trump" bandwagon
There are two people who could hypothetically get me to vote for Trump.
Rashida Harbi Tlaib or Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez if somehow either of them were to become the democratic nominee.
Rashida Harbi Tlaib or Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez if somehow either of them were to become the democratic nominee.
I no longer directly engage Rate This
Re: Matt will be happy - I'm now on the "dump Trump" bandwagon
I never made a thread saying I would never vote for Biden.bmw wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 9:47 amHaving had enough of Trump and voting for him over an en even worse Democrat are not mutually exclusive events. Your suggestion is that if Trump gets the nomination, I should either outright vote for what I view as an even worse candidate running with the party which I've had more than enough of for a decade and a half or should vote 3rd party or stay home. That's an absurd suggestion.Honeyman wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 9:36 amYou bullshit opening statement in this thread says, "I've had enough" not once, but twice. Obviously, you haven't.
And I know why you refuse to answer my question. It is because there's no such thing as a Democrat voter having had enough of any specific Democrat politician. You all can mildly piss and moan about how Biden or Clinton have been in politics too long, or how you want younger candidates, but at the end of the day, you will ALWAYS, WITHOUT FAIL, vote for the candidate with the (D) after their name. So lets not pretend to play moral superiority games here.
The censorship king from out of state.
Re: Matt will be happy - I'm now on the "dump Trump" bandwagon
Nope.
I have no issue voting third party. I don't feel it's a wasted vote. And while I live in a state that essentially has already been declared for the Democrats, if I lived in a battleground state, I could still not cast my vote for someone I have no trust in.
The censorship king from out of state.
Re: Matt will be happy - I'm now on the "dump Trump" bandwagon
I am still interested in hearing about serious people that would join a second Trump Administration...
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
Re: Matt will be happy - I'm now on the "dump Trump" bandwagon
So if it was Newsom vs. Trump, and you lived in Michigan, you'd vote 3rd party? I"m not sure I believe you.Honeyman wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:23 am Nope.
I have no issue voting third party. I don't feel it's a wasted vote. And while I live in a state that essentially has already been declared for the Democrats, if I lived in a battleground state, I could still not cast my vote for someone I have no trust in.
There are only 2 legitimate reasons to vote 3rd party: 1 - somehow, one has actually become viable, or 2 - both candidates are equally bad. Even though you've said Newsom is an "abject failure," I somehow doubt you find him equally objectionable as you find Trump.
Re: Matt will be happy - I'm now on the "dump Trump" bandwagon
If you lived in Georgia, would you vote for Walker?
The censorship king from out of state.
Re: Matt will be happy - I'm now on the "dump Trump" bandwagon
It is hard to take your question seriously when you suggested that Trump would choose the My Pillow guy as the Secretary of Defense. In all seriousness though, I don't know who would end up in his administration. But I can guarantee you there'd be "serious people" interested in those positions.
Re: Matt will be happy - I'm now on the "dump Trump" bandwagon
Absolutely. He has been unfairly trashed by the media, IMO, and whenever I've heard him speak, he sounds way more intelligent than people have made him out to be. As to his past, nothing he's been accused of comes close to Warnock being accused of trying to run his wife over with his car or interfering with a police investigation into child abuse that was allegedly taking place in - what was it - church camps?, that he was running.
Re: Matt will be happy - I'm now on the "dump Trump" bandwagon
I don't find him equally objectionable as Trump. But unlike you, I refuse to vote for the lesser of two evils if that person is deplorable in my eyes.bmw wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:36 amSo if it was Newsom vs. Trump, and you lived in Michigan, you'd vote 3rd party? I"m not sure I believe you.Honeyman wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:23 am Nope.
I have no issue voting third party. I don't feel it's a wasted vote. And while I live in a state that essentially has already been declared for the Democrats, if I lived in a battleground state, I could still not cast my vote for someone I have no trust in.
There are only 2 legitimate reasons to vote 3rd party: 1 - somehow, one has actually become viable, or 2 - both candidates are equally bad. Even though you've said Newsom is an "abject failure," I somehow doubt you find him equally objectionable as you find Trump.
But please don't ask me if I'm rooting for OSU or UM Saturday.
The censorship king from out of state.