There is no proof. Trumps people have offered none. That’s on them and nobody else.
Acceptable registrations in the queue through May 12 at 7:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Trump Fires Cyber Security Chief
Re: Trump Fires Cyber Security Chief
Re: Trump Fires Cyber Security Chief
When I first heard about the statement they put out, I figured it was addressing outside influences, particularly other countries and was in response to the concerns about 2016. That would have made sense especially in light of the preemptive cyber strike they conducted a couple weeks ago to thwart such activities.
When I finally read the actual statement, what I read was totally irresponsible. There is no way they could have conducted enough investigations into all the various anomalies around the country, even if those anomalies would not have resulted in a change to the current election station.
Totally irresponsible. If he had any part in making that statement happen, I'm glad he's gone.
When I finally read the actual statement, what I read was totally irresponsible. There is no way they could have conducted enough investigations into all the various anomalies around the country, even if those anomalies would not have resulted in a change to the current election station.
Totally irresponsible. If he had any part in making that statement happen, I'm glad he's gone.
Re: Trump Fires Cyber Security Chief
Then why does Rudy keep getting tossed out of court?
I don't mean to brag, but I just put a puzzle together in 1 day and the box said 2-4 years.
Re: Trump Fires Cyber Security Chief
If there were evidence they wouldn’t be 0-22 in court and counting while haggling over 10 ballots here and 5 there and having courts tell them to stop wasting everybody’s time. The election was legitimate. Your guy shot himself in the foot repeatedly. He lost as a result. The sky is blue by the way in other obvious news. If they had actual evidence they would have put it up by now. This is just a large tantrum from a 74 year old child.km1125 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 19, 2020 1:47 pmWhen I first heard about the statement they put out, I figured it was addressing outside influences, particularly other countries and was in response to the concerns about 2016. That would have made sense especially in light of the preemptive cyber strike they conducted a couple weeks ago to thwart such activities.
When I finally read the actual statement, what I read was totally irresponsible. There is no way they could have conducted enough investigations into all the various anomalies around the country, even if those anomalies would not have resulted in a change to the current election station.
Totally irresponsible. If he had any part in making that statement happen, I'm glad he's gone.
Last edited by Rate This on Thu Nov 19, 2020 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Trump Fires Cyber Security Chief
The censorship king from out of state.
Re: Trump Fires Cyber Security Chief
The censorship king from out of state.
Re: Trump Fires Cyber Security Chief
I haven't seen all the court cases, but I'm guessing they're making the wrong requests to the court based on the information they're providing. Those mistakes fall directly on the attorneys. They may be making the mistake of assuming that the judges would see things they think are obvious, instead of actually presenting a case that makes those things front-and-center.
Re: Trump Fires Cyber Security Chief
Rudy himself has been laughed out of court... other cases have involved 60 votes here and 70 votes there... the courts response was “this is a waste of our time.”km1125 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 19, 2020 2:31 pmI haven't seen all the court cases, but I'm guessing they're making the wrong requests to the court based on the information they're providing. Those mistakes fall directly on the attorneys. They may be making the mistake of assuming that the judges would see things they think are obvious, instead of actually presenting a case that makes those things front-and-center.
They need evidence of 50,000 or 100,000 ballots being faulty... they just don’t have that evidence because it doesn’t exist.
That’s why the president is inviting state legislators to the White House... if he can’t steal it in the courts where he is getting absolutely no traction then they will simply circumvent the vote and ignore the laws in those states which require the electors to be from the party of the popular vote winner.
He shouldn’t have told his supporters mail in ballots were bad. Plain and simple. It was his undoing. Too bad. Trump has a long history of shooting himself in the foot, he’s simply not very good at this...