Some registered account users are experiencing password recognition issues. The issue appears to have been triggered by a PHP update last night. If this is occurring, please try logging in and using the "forgot password?" utility. Bear in mind auto-generated password reset emails may appear in your spam folder. If this does not work, please click the "Contact Us" option near the lower right hand corner of the index page to contact me via email.
Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.
Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.
Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.
-
- Posts: 2778
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:05 am
Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.
Trump is going down.
He’s anti-America. He’s pro-Putin. He’s a GD traitor. He wants to be dictator for life.
The majority of Americans and now even some republican cowardly lawmakers are turning against this lawless bitch of a spoiled brat who makes a mockery of the US presidency and all our democratic traditions and institutions and American values.
Your focus should be on his lawless nature and way of operating, scum bucket words, and indecent fearful behaviors. Instead you focus on procedure. Get the hell real. You are worthless.
Thank God you’re outnumbered by true blue patriots.
He’s anti-America. He’s pro-Putin. He’s a GD traitor. He wants to be dictator for life.
The majority of Americans and now even some republican cowardly lawmakers are turning against this lawless bitch of a spoiled brat who makes a mockery of the US presidency and all our democratic traditions and institutions and American values.
Your focus should be on his lawless nature and way of operating, scum bucket words, and indecent fearful behaviors. Instead you focus on procedure. Get the hell real. You are worthless.
Thank God you’re outnumbered by true blue patriots.
Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.
So it's ok for them to attack Trump on baseless bullshit, but he can't respond?hanson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:18 amA formal impeachment vote would only provide a list of "targets", from both parties, for trump to attack.Matt wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 5:52 amAlternatively, prosecutors that have an actual case don't cut out legal steps if they actually have a case. If there was a formal impeachment vote, that would be one thing. Of course in an actual investigation, Adam Schiff's letter writing/letter writing coaching would be exposed like "Story time with Adam Schiff" has already been exposed. The White House is absolutely right not to cooperate with an at this time illegitimate inquiry.
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.
There have been three prior impeachment inquiry's. All three commenced after a vote of the full House of Representatives. Pretty odd that people so hung up on "precedence" when it comes to Roe v. Wade have no regard for "precedence" when it comes to impeachment.screen glare wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:20 pm FORMAL VOTE utter nonsense! It's NOT proper procedure, bmw. According to the US Constitution it does not exist. The Constitution is vague about impeachment procedure nitty gritty. What’s clear is the US House is in charge. And the folks in power there - are the people’s recent choice - a record number of elected democrats.
So shut your cry-baby mouth. FORMAL VOTE not required.
The Constitution does indeed give the House the power of impeachment. The House, a decision made by the entire body,not just 20 or 30 members. It requires a vote.
The Constitution of the United States doesn't call for separation of Church and State, nor does it guarantee the right to a abortion. To date, "precedence" of past rulings and action has enshrined both of those.
Hypocrites all of you.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
-
- Posts: 2778
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:05 am
Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.
Worried Trump’s a gonner - and all self-inflicted. Tisk. Tisk. Keep whining over being left at the starting line. And remember the cause of all your frustration. The supreme commander of the deplorables. Donald Trump.
Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.
Weren't you the same person who guaranteed us that HilLIEry would be our next president a couple years ago? I seem to recall you also claimed something about Russian collusion and the Muller investigation (which nobody on the left talks about anymore) would be T Rump's downfall.screen glare wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:39 pm Worried Trump’s a gonner - and all self-inflicted. Tisk. Tisk. Keep whining over being left at the starting line. And remember the cause of all your frustration. The supreme commander of the deplorables. Donald Trump.
Forgive me if I give your opinion the value of a pile of cow dung. Actually less. Cow dung makes excellent fertilizer. Your opinion has absolutely no value whatsoever.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.
and what does Donald Trump do? You really are becoming an idiot here.
For Kristian Trumpers are not serving our Lord Christ, but their own appetites. By smooth talk and flattery they deceive the minds of naive people.
-Romans 16:18
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
-Romans 16:18
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.
thank you for today's bit of humor.
You really have the outrage thing down pretty well
For Kristian Trumpers are not serving our Lord Christ, but their own appetites. By smooth talk and flattery they deceive the minds of naive people.
-Romans 16:18
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
-Romans 16:18
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
- audiophile
- Posts: 9236
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.
Says the guy from ThC town.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.
Just to help you out, the word you are looking for here is "precedents".
prec·e·dence - noun - the condition of being considered more important than someone or something else; priority in importance, order, or rank.
prec·e·dent - noun - plural noun: precedents - an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.
Using the right word might make your argument stronger.
-
- Posts: 2778
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:05 am
Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.
Bryce -
The entire world (based on polling) thought The First Lady of both a state and later the nation, United States Senator, and Secretary of State for eight years - was about to win the US presidency. So I’ll stand by the logic of my pre-election prediction - especially considering her record breaking POPULAR vote annihilation of Putin’s Puppet - Con Artist and Traitor Trump.
AND - any person who has actually read completely Robert Mueller’s Report, instead of being conned into believing AG Simon Barr Sinister’s opposite conclusions - well understands that Putin’s Puppet colluded and continues to collude with his puppet master Putin (Ukraine and Syria disasters commonality? = What Putin Wanted!) AND obstructed and continues to obstruct justice. So I stand by my opinions - based on truth.
And what does cow fertilizer do? It spreads nutrients into the earth encouraging strong new life. Goodness supporting goodness. Despite weeds and insects strangling and trying to devour the entire field.
You’re nothing but a larval pest, Bryce. Delighting Traitor Trump and Poisonous Putin.
As John McCain would no doubt have noted: worse than a pile of HUMAN shit.
The entire world (based on polling) thought The First Lady of both a state and later the nation, United States Senator, and Secretary of State for eight years - was about to win the US presidency. So I’ll stand by the logic of my pre-election prediction - especially considering her record breaking POPULAR vote annihilation of Putin’s Puppet - Con Artist and Traitor Trump.
AND - any person who has actually read completely Robert Mueller’s Report, instead of being conned into believing AG Simon Barr Sinister’s opposite conclusions - well understands that Putin’s Puppet colluded and continues to collude with his puppet master Putin (Ukraine and Syria disasters commonality? = What Putin Wanted!) AND obstructed and continues to obstruct justice. So I stand by my opinions - based on truth.
And what does cow fertilizer do? It spreads nutrients into the earth encouraging strong new life. Goodness supporting goodness. Despite weeds and insects strangling and trying to devour the entire field.
You’re nothing but a larval pest, Bryce. Delighting Traitor Trump and Poisonous Putin.
As John McCain would no doubt have noted: worse than a pile of HUMAN shit.
Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.
"bullshit"? Well, you seem to be parroting your cheerless leader. can't think for yourself, can you.Matt wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:26 pmSo it's ok for them to attack Trump on baseless bullshit, but he can't respond?hanson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:18 amA formal impeachment vote would only provide a list of "targets", from both parties, for trump to attack.Matt wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 5:52 amAlternatively, prosecutors that have an actual case don't cut out legal steps if they actually have a case. If there was a formal impeachment vote, that would be one thing. Of course in an actual investigation, Adam Schiff's letter writing/letter writing coaching would be exposed like "Story time with Adam Schiff" has already been exposed. The White House is absolutely right not to cooperate with an at this time illegitimate inquiry.
Last edited by hanson on Sat Oct 12, 2019 10:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.
trump can't stand to be outdone by anyone.........if putin is a dictator for life, trump has to be one, tooscreen glare wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:39 pm
He’s anti-America. He’s pro-Putin. He’s a GD traitor. He wants to be dictator for life.
Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.
Thank you for the correction. I always wanted a good editor.Radio Sucks wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 8:32 amJust to help you out, the word you are looking for here is "precedents".
prec·e·dence - noun - the condition of being considered more important than someone or something else; priority in importance, order, or rank.
prec·e·dent - noun - plural noun: precedents - an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.
Using the right word might make your argument stronger.
Hope I get continuing education credits.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.
What "crimes" have been committed?hanson wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 10:29 am"bullshit"? Well, you seem to be parroting your cheerless leader. can't think for yourself, can you.Matt wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:26 pmSo it's ok for them to attack Trump on baseless bullshit, but he can't respond?hanson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:18 amA formal impeachment vote would only provide a list of "targets", from both parties, for trump to attack.Matt wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 5:52 amAlternatively, prosecutors that have an actual case don't cut out legal steps if they actually have a case. If there was a formal impeachment vote, that would be one thing. Of course in an actual investigation, Adam Schiff's letter writing/letter writing coaching would be exposed like "Story time with Adam Schiff" has already been exposed. The White House is absolutely right not to cooperate with an at this time illegitimate inquiry.
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw