Are you going to be charged with reckless abandonment?MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:09 pmLife begins at ejaculation, so stop jerking off.
Acceptable registrations in the queue through June 3 at 5:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
- audiophile
- Posts: 8660
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6571
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
That goes for anyone who is "pro-life" and anti women. Live your values.audiophile wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:14 pmAre you going to be charged with reckless abandonment?MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:09 pmLife begins at ejaculation, so stop jerking off.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6571
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
You stupid fucks want to live like it's 1955, that means jerking off is bad again for you. No non pro creative sex. Clarence is doing the bed checks tonight.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
Get a grip.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:20 pmYou stupid fucks want to live like it's 1955, that means jerking off is bad again for you. No non pro creative sex. Clarence is doing the bed checks tonight.
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6571
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
You first. You voted for this shit.Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:23 pmGet a grip.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:20 pmYou stupid fucks want to live like it's 1955, that means jerking off is bad again for you. No non pro creative sex. Clarence is doing the bed checks tonight.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
What shit? I'm happy with the outcome.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:33 pmYou first. You voted for this shit.Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:23 pmGet a grip.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:20 pmYou stupid fucks want to live like it's 1955, that means jerking off is bad again for you. No non pro creative sex. Clarence is doing the bed checks tonight.
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
https://mobile.twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/st ... Tg8-AqAAAA
This person has deleted the tweet and wasn't even suspended.
This person has deleted the tweet and wasn't even suspended.
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6571
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
Autumn who? Who cares? She means nothing.Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:28 pmhttps://mobile.twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/st ... Tg8-AqAAAA
This person has deleted the tweet and wasn't even suspended.
When you voted for DJT in 2016, you voted to strip away the rights of women. Dump chose this pathetic shit when he selected two CONS to the bench. You suck for aiding this.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
I'll do this in a way you can understand: nO RIghTs wERe LosT tODaY.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:35 pmAutumn who? Who cares? She means nothing.Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:28 pmhttps://mobile.twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/st ... Tg8-AqAAAA
This person has deleted the tweet and wasn't even suspended.
When you voted for DJT in 2016, you voted to strip away the rights of women. Dump chose this pathetic shit when he selected two CONS to the bench. You suck for aiding this.
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
Here's another racist lib for you: https://mobile.twitter.com/Asae/status/ ... yM3eAqAAAAMotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:35 pmAutumn who? Who cares? She means nothing.Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:28 pmhttps://mobile.twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/st ... Tg8-AqAAAA
This person has deleted the tweet and wasn't even suspended.
When you voted for DJT in 2016, you voted to strip away the rights of women. Dump chose this pathetic shit when he selected two CONS to the bench. You suck for aiding this.
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6571
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
No one cares what a few randos Tweeted.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
They are representative of the emotional, racist left. There is no real support of diversity in the left. They support diverse people ONLY IF they ideologically agree with them. Otherwise, they are bigots to the worst degree.
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
Days like yesterday and today were precisely the reason I encouraged never-Trumpers back in 2016 to vote for Trump. Trump's presidency may have only lasted 4 years, but his legacy will last for decades through the Supreme Court.
- audiophile
- Posts: 8660
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
You were right, I just didn't believe he was serious. I did not vote for him in 2016. I don't think Matt did either.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)
I explicitly recall both you and Matt making similar comments at the time. My position was you KNOW what you'll get with Hillary. At least with Trump there's a chance you'll get what you want.