Acceptable registrations in the queue through June 3 at 5:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Boebert Wants “America’s Most Dangerous Weapon” Declared the “National Gun” in the Wake of Tragic Mass Shootings
Boebert Wants “America’s Most Dangerous Weapon” Declared the “National Gun” in the Wake of Tragic Mass Shootings
Woe to you, oh earth and sea
For the Devil sends the beast with wrath
Because he knows the time is short
Let him who hath understanding reckon the number of the beast
For it is a human number
Its number is six hundred and sixty-six
For the Devil sends the beast with wrath
Because he knows the time is short
Let him who hath understanding reckon the number of the beast
For it is a human number
Its number is six hundred and sixty-six
- teetoppz28
- Posts: 823
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 5:01 pm
Re: Boebert Wants “America’s Most Dangerous Weapon” Declared the “National Gun” in the Wake of Tragic Mass Shootings
Well, her nickname isn't "Bazooka Barbie" for nothing...
Dropping knowledge on forum MAGAts.
Unapologetically intellectually superior.
Unapologetically intellectually superior.
Re: Boebert Wants “America’s Most Dangerous Weapon” Declared the “National Gun” in the Wake of Tragic Mass Shootings
Why stop there? Designate a National Knife too. Or maybe a National Poison. National Ligature Device. Or how about a National Disease.
I don't mean to brag, but I just put a puzzle together in 1 day and the box said 2-4 years.
Re: Boebert Wants “America’s Most Dangerous Weapon” Declared the “National Gun” in the Wake of Tragic Mass Shootings
Are you saying you wouldn't go to a movie with her?teetoppz28 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2023 3:16 pmWell, her nickname isn't "Bazooka Barbie" for nothing...
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
- teetoppz28
- Posts: 823
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 5:01 pm
Re: Boebert Wants “America’s Most Dangerous Weapon” Declared the “National Gun” in the Wake of Tragic Mass Shootings
I'd allow her to Mel Tucker me in the theatre, yes.Matt wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2023 3:44 pmAre you saying you wouldn't go to a movie with her?teetoppz28 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2023 3:16 pmWell, her nickname isn't "Bazooka Barbie" for nothing...
Dropping knowledge on forum MAGAts.
Unapologetically intellectually superior.
Unapologetically intellectually superior.
Re: Boebert Wants “America’s Most Dangerous Weapon” Declared the “National Gun” in the Wake of Tragic Mass Shootings
National Disease...
Woe to you, oh earth and sea
For the Devil sends the beast with wrath
Because he knows the time is short
Let him who hath understanding reckon the number of the beast
For it is a human number
Its number is six hundred and sixty-six
For the Devil sends the beast with wrath
Because he knows the time is short
Let him who hath understanding reckon the number of the beast
For it is a human number
Its number is six hundred and sixty-six
- teetoppz28
- Posts: 823
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 5:01 pm
Re: Boebert Wants “America’s Most Dangerous Weapon” Declared the “National Gun” in the Wake of Tragic Mass Shootings
We already have one: MAGAt infestation
Dropping knowledge on forum MAGAts.
Unapologetically intellectually superior.
Unapologetically intellectually superior.
Re: Boebert Wants “America’s Most Dangerous Weapon” Declared the “National Gun” in the Wake of Tragic Mass Shootings
Indeed!
Woe to you, oh earth and sea
For the Devil sends the beast with wrath
Because he knows the time is short
Let him who hath understanding reckon the number of the beast
For it is a human number
Its number is six hundred and sixty-six
For the Devil sends the beast with wrath
Because he knows the time is short
Let him who hath understanding reckon the number of the beast
For it is a human number
Its number is six hundred and sixty-six
Re: Boebert Wants “America’s Most Dangerous Weapon” Declared the “National Gun” in the Wake of Tragic Mass Shootings
The idiot who wrote that evidently didn't take the time to even read the article in Time that they used to give AR-15 STYLE rifles the most dangerous label.Taco wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2023 2:57 pmSick...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/it-s- ... c5db&ei=49
https://time.com/6278608/ar-15-rifle-as ... ns-uvalde/Steve Lindley, program manager of Brady United Against Gun Violence, a gun violence prevention organization, says he would hesitate to call the AR-15 the “weapon of choice for mass shooters,” but still describes the AR-15 as a “weapon of war.”
Not to mention, handguns FAR outnumber ANY KIND OF RIFLE much less AR-15 style rifles as the weapon of choice for homicides in the U.S.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/195 ... apon-used/
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: Boebert Wants “America’s Most Dangerous Weapon” Declared the “National Gun” in the Wake of Tragic Mass Shootings
Ahhh .. another discussion about guns.
For the most part, everything I'm about to say I've said before here on Buzzboard.
Regulating guns is a lost cause. There's more guns than people in the US. We're not a country that started controlling gun ownership early. And if you delve deep, mass shootings also happen in those countries, despite what some on here like to say.
It's a sad but true commentary. But worrying about getting shot is like worrying you're going to be hit by a car, or catch some life threatening illness. It is what it is now. I know y'all want to Huff and Puff that something should be done. But just like all the hot air in Washington, no practical solutions.
Saying all that, I do agree with those who say "Why does anyone need an assault rifle?". For what? No one uses them to go hunting. If someone could tell me a practical reason for anyone to own one, I'm all ears.
Let's have a discussion. Not just quote what I wrote and respond with a one line quip. I know that's difficult for Matt and Turkeytop to do. But give it a try. Put a little thought into it, see if you can come up with a concise paragraph that isn't just a copy-n-paste of some article you seen elsewhere.
For the most part, everything I'm about to say I've said before here on Buzzboard.
Regulating guns is a lost cause. There's more guns than people in the US. We're not a country that started controlling gun ownership early. And if you delve deep, mass shootings also happen in those countries, despite what some on here like to say.
It's a sad but true commentary. But worrying about getting shot is like worrying you're going to be hit by a car, or catch some life threatening illness. It is what it is now. I know y'all want to Huff and Puff that something should be done. But just like all the hot air in Washington, no practical solutions.
Saying all that, I do agree with those who say "Why does anyone need an assault rifle?". For what? No one uses them to go hunting. If someone could tell me a practical reason for anyone to own one, I'm all ears.
Let's have a discussion. Not just quote what I wrote and respond with a one line quip. I know that's difficult for Matt and Turkeytop to do. But give it a try. Put a little thought into it, see if you can come up with a concise paragraph that isn't just a copy-n-paste of some article you seen elsewhere.
Re: Boebert Wants “America’s Most Dangerous Weapon” Declared the “National Gun” in the Wake of Tragic Mass Shootings
To have that discussion, you need folks to acknowledge that it's not the gun that kills. It's the person who pulls the trigger. There are too many who just can't get there in that thinking.Round Six wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 9:32 am....
Let's have a discussion. Not just quote what I wrote and respond with a one line quip. I know that's difficult for Matt and Turkeytop to do. But give it a try. Put a little thought into it, see if you can come up with a concise paragraph that isn't just a copy-n-paste of some article you seen elsewhere.
Figuring out why that person pulled the trigger and dealing with that, is the issue. Some are accidents and virtually ALL of those can be dealt with via training. There was just a study released earlier this year (https://www.washingtonpost.com/wellness ... ety-video/) that showed just watching a ONE MINUTE video ONE TIME dramatically changed the behavior of 8-12 year old kids when they found a gun. How much more impact could we have if kids saw that once a year or once a month??
And obviously mental health is a h u g e issue and we should be having a real discussion about how we determine who is really mentally ill "enough" that it requires intervention. Mental illness problems go way beyond just gun-related homicides and if we made progress there we'd have a h u g e improvement in society in general. It would improve schools, the homeless situation and overall worker productivity, aside from the obvious and direct benefit of reducing violence, whether performed with a gun or other device.
Re: Boebert Wants “America’s Most Dangerous Weapon” Declared the “National Gun” in the Wake of Tragic Mass Shootings
We’ll just nuke everything and start over. That’s extreme but practical.Round Six wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 9:32 amAhhh .. another discussion about guns.
For the most part, everything I'm about to say I've said before here on Buzzboard.
Regulating guns is a lost cause. There's more guns than people in the US. We're not a country that started controlling gun ownership early. And if you delve deep, mass shootings also happen in those countries, despite what some on here like to say.
It's a sad but true commentary. But worrying about getting shot is like worrying you're going to be hit by a car, or catch some life threatening illness. It is what it is now. I know y'all want to Huff and Puff that something should be done. But just like all the hot air in Washington, no practical solutions.
Saying all that, I do agree with those who say "Why does anyone need an assault rifle?". For what? No one uses them to go hunting. If someone could tell me a practical reason for anyone to own one, I'm all ears.
Let's have a discussion. Not just quote what I wrote and respond with a one line quip. I know that's difficult for Matt and Turkeytop to do. But give it a try. Put a little thought into it, see if you can come up with a concise paragraph that isn't just a copy-n-paste of some article you seen elsewhere.
Re: Boebert Wants “America’s Most Dangerous Weapon” Declared the “National Gun” in the Wake of Tragic Mass Shootings
Better yet, I'll just stay out of this discussion. I'm not an assault rifle owner and I have no idea how it feels to be an assault rifle owner or what motivates you owners. So, it's probably none of my business.Round Six wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 9:32 am
Let's have a discussion. Not just quote what I wrote and respond with a one line quip. I know that's difficult for Matt and Turkeytop to do. But give it a try. Put a little thought into it, see if you can come up with a concise paragraph that isn't just a copy-n-paste of some article you seen elsewhere.
Maybe mass shootings have some positive social value. Who am I to suggest otherwise?
I don't mean to brag, but I just put a puzzle together in 1 day and the box said 2-4 years.
Re: Boebert Wants “America’s Most Dangerous Weapon” Declared the “National Gun” in the Wake of Tragic Mass Shootings
I don't own any assault rifles. Nor do I need them or want them. What would I need one for?? What would any civilian really need one for?
Woe to you, oh earth and sea
For the Devil sends the beast with wrath
Because he knows the time is short
Let him who hath understanding reckon the number of the beast
For it is a human number
Its number is six hundred and sixty-six
For the Devil sends the beast with wrath
Because he knows the time is short
Let him who hath understanding reckon the number of the beast
For it is a human number
Its number is six hundred and sixty-six