Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 30 at 9:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

Kim Russell getting the interview

Miss the posts from your favorite flame artist or troll who added little to no value to the Buzzboard? Read 'em here!
lovinlife101
Posts: 6164
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:53 am

Re: Kim Russell getting the interview

Post by lovinlife101 » Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:06 am

Editorcj wrote:
Fri Nov 06, 2020 7:13 pm
She is pregnant, it is a high risk pregnancy, and those fools won't wear masks and social distance. KR is tough and fearless but she won't risk her baby going into a press scrum during a pandemic.
But she’ll risk working full time in a stressful environment instead of getting the required rest for a high-risk pregnancy. Got it, Skippy.



lovinlife101
Posts: 6164
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:53 am

Re: Kim Russell getting the interview

Post by lovinlife101 » Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:25 pm

LouPerry wrote:
Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:25 pm
Kim is an excellent journalist. Networks take note.
She looks out for herself, and that's about it.

https://www.mlive.com/news/flint/2009/0 ... _stat.html

She sued a former employer because Flint is dangerous. Hmmm.



lovinlife101
Posts: 6164
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:53 am

Re: Kim Russell getting the interview

Post by lovinlife101 » Tue Nov 10, 2020 5:21 pm

km1125 wrote:
Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:05 pm
Wait, she sued because she wasn't treated differently because she's a woman???
Yep.

She wanted the station to hire private security for her only.

Nice.



lovinlife101
Posts: 6164
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:53 am

Re: Kim Russell getting the interview

Post by lovinlife101 » Wed Nov 11, 2020 6:40 am

696lover wrote:
Tue Nov 10, 2020 5:07 pm
km1125 wrote:
Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:05 pm
Wait, she sued because she wasn't treated differently because she's a woman???
The allegation is that she refused the advances so she was assigned to walk alone every morning at 3am from the surface parking lot to the mini studio for no real reason other than payback.

There was a settlement and she was hired by another station pretty quick. I drew a conclusion from that
Nobody is alleging any advances.

She wanted private security hired to walk her to her car at night. The station didn’t do it and she sued.

It’s hilarious how her lawyer said it was because she was a woman. The male photographer who worked there didn’t get private security either and he didn’t sue.



Post Reply Previous topicNext topic