Do you have really nice tits or something?
Acceptable registrations in the queue through June 3 at 5:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Straight Conservative Dudes Freak Out over Queer Women
Re: Straight Conservative Dudes Freak Out over Queer Women
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: Straight Conservative Dudes Freak Out over Queer Women
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6575
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Straight Conservative Dudes Freak Out over Queer Women
Because bisexuals exist(like me) and we are not homosexual. Queer is an umbrella term. I am sorry that your dictionary hasn't caught up with it. Besides, the article was referencing bisexual women more specifically. It was bitching about how sexuality is fluid.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6575
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Straight Conservative Dudes Freak Out over Queer Women
It's actually not. And the reason being is because a person can transition from female to male; present as a man and date a female. There has to be a term or would you prefer non transgender?Matt wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:26 pmNo argument here...
I prefer to be called straight, not cis or cisgendered. That's a bullshit re-wording if I've ever heard one.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Straight Conservative Dudes Freak Out over Queer Women
Doesn't "bi" mean you are also homosexual or sometimes homosexual??MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:52 amBecause bisexuals exist(like me) and we are not homosexual. Queer is an umbrella term. I am sorry that your dictionary hasn't caught up with it. Besides, the article was referencing bisexual women more specifically. It was bitching about how sexuality is fluid.
Seems like "straight" would still differentiate properly.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:55 amIt's actually not. And the reason being is because a person can transition from female to male; present as a man and date a female. There has to be a term or would you prefer non transgender?
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6575
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Straight Conservative Dudes Freak Out over Queer Women
We are not or straight. That’s the point. We are unique as bi people. We disrupt the binary. Bi people have our own issues because we are rejected by many straight and gay people. We have our own unique challenges.km1125 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 6:25 pmDoesn't "bi" mean you are also homosexual or sometimes homosexual??MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:52 amBecause bisexuals exist(like me) and we are not homosexual. Queer is an umbrella term. I am sorry that your dictionary hasn't caught up with it. Besides, the article was referencing bisexual women more specifically. It was bitching about how sexuality is fluid.
Seems like "straight" would still differentiate properly.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:55 amIt's actually not. And the reason being is because a person can transition from female to male; present as a man and date a female. There has to be a term or would you prefer non transgender?
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Straight Conservative Dudes Freak Out over Queer Women
You're introducing actual science into a discussion like this??lovinlife101 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:50 amYou are either XX or XY. All of you.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:55 amIt's actually not. And the reason being is because a person can transition from female to male; present as a man and date a female. There has to be a term or would you prefer non transgender?Matt wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:26 pmNo argument here...
I prefer to be called straight, not cis or cisgendered. That's a bullshit re-wording if I've ever heard one.
You can play dress-up all you want, but evidence and facts aren’t changed.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6575
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Straight Conservative Dudes Freak Out over Queer Women
Says the fucking cunt troll. People can be bi. Deal with it, bitch. I am not confused.lovinlife101 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:45 amYou just want attention.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 9:31 pmWe are not or straight. That’s the point. We are unique as bi people. We disrupt the binary. Bi people have our own issues because we are rejected by many straight and gay people. We have our own unique challenges.km1125 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 6:25 pmDoesn't "bi" mean you are also homosexual or sometimes homosexual??MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:52 amBecause bisexuals exist(like me) and we are not homosexual. Queer is an umbrella term. I am sorry that your dictionary hasn't caught up with it. Besides, the article was referencing bisexual women more specifically. It was bitching about how sexuality is fluid.
Seems like "straight" would still differentiate properly.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:55 amIt's actually not. And the reason being is because a person can transition from female to male; present as a man and date a female. There has to be a term or would you prefer non transgender?
That’s cute.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6575
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Straight Conservative Dudes Freak Out over Queer Women
Trust me, I am not curious. I know who I am. Go fuck yourself.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.