Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 16 at 11:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
screen glare
Posts: 2778
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:05 am

Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.

Post by screen glare » Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:39 pm

Trump is going down.

He’s anti-America. He’s pro-Putin. He’s a GD traitor. He wants to be dictator for life.

The majority of Americans and now even some republican cowardly lawmakers are turning against this lawless bitch of a spoiled brat who makes a mockery of the US presidency and all our democratic traditions and institutions and American values.

Your focus should be on his lawless nature and way of operating, scum bucket words, and indecent fearful behaviors. Instead you focus on procedure. Get the hell real. You are worthless.

Thank God you’re outnumbered by true blue patriots.



Matt
Posts: 9845
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Where Ben Zonia couldn't cut it

Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.

Post by Matt » Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:26 pm

hanson wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:18 am
Matt wrote:
Wed Oct 09, 2019 5:52 am
Vic Doucette wrote:
Wed Oct 09, 2019 5:39 am
Innocent people don't act like Trump.
Alternatively, prosecutors that have an actual case don't cut out legal steps if they actually have a case. If there was a formal impeachment vote, that would be one thing. Of course in an actual investigation, Adam Schiff's letter writing/letter writing coaching would be exposed like "Story time with Adam Schiff" has already been exposed. The White House is absolutely right not to cooperate with an at this time illegitimate inquiry.
A formal impeachment vote would only provide a list of "targets", from both parties, for trump to attack.
So it's ok for them to attack Trump on baseless bullshit, but he can't respond?


What's more pathetic: harassing an old man who is paying to do a radio show or supporting a grifter like Trump?

User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7141
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.

Post by Bryce » Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:20 pm

screen glare wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:20 pm
FORMAL VOTE utter nonsense! It's NOT proper procedure, bmw. According to the US Constitution it does not exist. The Constitution is vague about impeachment procedure nitty gritty. What’s clear is the US House is in charge. And the folks in power there - are the people’s recent choice - a record number of elected democrats.

So shut your cry-baby mouth. FORMAL VOTE not required.
There have been three prior impeachment inquiry's. All three commenced after a vote of the full House of Representatives. Pretty odd that people so hung up on "precedence" when it comes to Roe v. Wade have no regard for "precedence" when it comes to impeachment.

The Constitution does indeed give the House the power of impeachment. The House, a decision made by the entire body,not just 20 or 30 members. It requires a vote.

The Constitution of the United States doesn't call for separation of Church and State, nor does it guarantee the right to a abortion. To date, "precedence" of past rulings and action has enshrined both of those.

Hypocrites all of you.


New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

screen glare
Posts: 2778
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:05 am

Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.

Post by screen glare » Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:39 pm

Worried Trump’s a gonner - and all self-inflicted. Tisk. Tisk. Keep whining over being left at the starting line. And remember the cause of all your frustration. The supreme commander of the deplorables. Donald Trump.



User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7141
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.

Post by Bryce » Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:48 pm

screen glare wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:39 pm
Worried Trump’s a gonner - and all self-inflicted. Tisk. Tisk. Keep whining over being left at the starting line. And remember the cause of all your frustration. The supreme commander of the deplorables. Donald Trump.
Weren't you the same person who guaranteed us that HilLIEry would be our next president a couple years ago? I seem to recall you also claimed something about Russian collusion and the Muller investigation (which nobody on the left talks about anymore) would be T Rump's downfall.

Forgive me if I give your opinion the value of a pile of cow dung. Actually less. Cow dung makes excellent fertilizer. Your opinion has absolutely no value whatsoever.


New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10100
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.

Post by TC Talks » Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:45 pm

bmw wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:46 am
hanson wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:18 am
A formal impeachment vote would only provide a list of "targets", from both parties, for trump to attack.
So we just abandon proper procedure?
and what does Donald Trump do? You really are becoming an idiot here.


“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10100
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.

Post by TC Talks » Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:46 pm

Bryce wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:20 pm
Hypocrites all of you.
thank you for today's bit of humor.

You really have the outrage thing down pretty well


“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 8546
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.

Post by audiophile » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:12 am

Says the guy from ThC town.


Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!

Deleted User 12047

Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.

Post by Deleted User 12047 » Sat Oct 12, 2019 8:32 am

Bryce wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:20 pm
To date, "precedence" of past rulings and action has enshrined both of those.
Just to help you out, the word you are looking for here is "precedents".

prec·e·dence - noun - the condition of being considered more important than someone or something else; priority in importance, order, or rank.

prec·e·dent - noun - plural noun: precedents - an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.

Using the right word might make your argument stronger.



screen glare
Posts: 2778
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:05 am

Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.

Post by screen glare » Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:43 am

Bryce -
The entire world (based on polling) thought The First Lady of both a state and later the nation, United States Senator, and Secretary of State for eight years - was about to win the US presidency. So I’ll stand by the logic of my pre-election prediction - especially considering her record breaking POPULAR vote annihilation of Putin’s Puppet - Con Artist and Traitor Trump.

AND - any person who has actually read completely Robert Mueller’s Report, instead of being conned into believing AG Simon Barr Sinister’s opposite conclusions - well understands that Putin’s Puppet colluded and continues to collude with his puppet master Putin (Ukraine and Syria disasters commonality? = What Putin Wanted!) AND obstructed and continues to obstruct justice. So I stand by my opinions - based on truth.

And what does cow fertilizer do? It spreads nutrients into the earth encouraging strong new life. Goodness supporting goodness. Despite weeds and insects strangling and trying to devour the entire field.

You’re nothing but a larval pest, Bryce. Delighting Traitor Trump and Poisonous Putin.

As John McCain would no doubt have noted: worse than a pile of HUMAN shit.



hanson
Posts: 366
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:41 pm

Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.

Post by hanson » Sat Oct 12, 2019 10:29 am

Matt wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:26 pm
hanson wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:18 am
Matt wrote:
Wed Oct 09, 2019 5:52 am
Vic Doucette wrote:
Wed Oct 09, 2019 5:39 am
Innocent people don't act like Trump.
Alternatively, prosecutors that have an actual case don't cut out legal steps if they actually have a case. If there was a formal impeachment vote, that would be one thing. Of course in an actual investigation, Adam Schiff's letter writing/letter writing coaching would be exposed like "Story time with Adam Schiff" has already been exposed. The White House is absolutely right not to cooperate with an at this time illegitimate inquiry.
A formal impeachment vote would only provide a list of "targets", from both parties, for trump to attack.
So it's ok for them to attack Trump on baseless bullshit, but he can't respond?
"bullshit"? Well, you seem to be parroting your cheerless leader. can't think for yourself, can you.
Last edited by hanson on Sat Oct 12, 2019 10:44 am, edited 1 time in total.



hanson
Posts: 366
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:41 pm

Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.

Post by hanson » Sat Oct 12, 2019 10:33 am

screen glare wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:39 pm

He’s anti-America. He’s pro-Putin. He’s a GD traitor. He wants to be dictator for life.
trump can't stand to be outdone by anyone.........if putin is a dictator for life, trump has to be one, too



User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7141
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.

Post by Bryce » Sat Oct 12, 2019 10:41 am

Radio Sucks wrote:
Sat Oct 12, 2019 8:32 am
Bryce wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:20 pm
To date, "precedence" of past rulings and action has enshrined both of those.
Just to help you out, the word you are looking for here is "precedents".

prec·e·dence - noun - the condition of being considered more important than someone or something else; priority in importance, order, or rank.

prec·e·dent - noun - plural noun: precedents - an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.

Using the right word might make your argument stronger.
Thank you for the correction. I always wanted a good editor.

Hope I get continuing education credits.


New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

Matt
Posts: 9845
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Where Ben Zonia couldn't cut it

Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.

Post by Matt » Sat Oct 12, 2019 2:30 pm

hanson wrote:
Sat Oct 12, 2019 10:29 am
Matt wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:26 pm
hanson wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:18 am
Matt wrote:
Wed Oct 09, 2019 5:52 am
Vic Doucette wrote:
Wed Oct 09, 2019 5:39 am
Innocent people don't act like Trump.
Alternatively, prosecutors that have an actual case don't cut out legal steps if they actually have a case. If there was a formal impeachment vote, that would be one thing. Of course in an actual investigation, Adam Schiff's letter writing/letter writing coaching would be exposed like "Story time with Adam Schiff" has already been exposed. The White House is absolutely right not to cooperate with an at this time illegitimate inquiry.
A formal impeachment vote would only provide a list of "targets", from both parties, for trump to attack.
So it's ok for them to attack Trump on baseless bullshit, but he can't respond?
"bullshit"? Well, you seem to be parroting your cheerless leader. can't think for yourself, can you.
What "crimes" have been committed?


What's more pathetic: harassing an old man who is paying to do a radio show or supporting a grifter like Trump?

bmw
Posts: 6723
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:02 am

Re: Defying Subpoenas During Impeachment Inquiry? Jail ‘em.

Post by bmw » Sat Oct 12, 2019 3:07 pm

Matt wrote:
Sat Oct 12, 2019 2:30 pm
What "crimes" have been committed?
You're wasting your time asking that question. Nobody in here has an answer for it.



Post Reply Previous topicNext topic