I'll start with this one:
![Image](http://breakingnewsfeeds.com/media/fake-news-1.jpg)
https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/30/politics ... index.html
And here is a perfect example of why CNN's ratings are in the tank and why I say that virtually no journalistic standards exist there.
Let's break down this headline grammatically. The word "and" allows it to be read as follows:
Trump claims he can defy Constitution.
Trump claims he can end birthright citizenship.
While the latter is correct, the first part is patently false. Trump did NOT claim that he can defy the Constitution. The author of the article may believe that Trump taking such an action would be unconstitutional, but to attribute your own legal opinion to the actual spoken words of another person when that person made no such statement is...
....wait for it....
FAKE NEWS.
NPR does a much better job of explaining the legal complexities of such an action:
https://www.npr.org/2018/10/30/66204390 ... tive-order