Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 16 at 11:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

Rush Limbaugh's buddy Q anon.

Discussion pertaining to Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo, Muskegon, Battle Creek, Big Rapids, and Michiana
User avatar
Reese K Rickards
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2020 5:22 pm

Rush Limbaugh's buddy Q anon.

Post by Reese K Rickards » Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:22 am

In the Rush Limbaugh "Legacy" thread I point point Limbaugh verbally attacked a young woman for asking her insurance company to cover her birth control costs, while Limbaugh was caught sneaking the sex enhancement Viagra (not his own script) into this country. I called that hypocrisy. As that thread unfolded, "AUTOBLEMIKE" WROTE, In Reese's first post he was quick to point out his (Limbaugh's) RX drug addiction. I did no such thing. ??Unless you can become addicted to Viagra??

But I digress. Today we learn who Limbaugh's conspiracy buddy Q anon is. According to a documentary aired by HBO, Q is Ron Watkins. WHO? https://news.yahoo.com/hbo-qanon-docuse ... 17080.html

Ron is the mixed race son of an US Army veteran in the Philippines. His dad Jim is well known for starting up a Japanese porn site.

How funny is it that white supremist's who insist pedophile liberals eat children are devoted to this man?

But don't believe me... read the article


If I Heart GR really wanted to save money, it would sublet two of it's three floors at 77 Monroe Center.

User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10103
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: Rush Limbaugh's buddy Q anon.

Post by TC Talks » Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:48 am

Why isn't this in the Political Forum? It has nothing to do with Grand Rapids.


“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

Deleted User 15506

Re: Rush Limbaugh's buddy Q anon.

Post by Deleted User 15506 » Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:01 am

Reese K Rickards wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:22 am
In the Rush Limbaugh "Legacy" thread I point point Limbaugh verbally attacked a young woman for asking her insurance company to cover her birth control costs, while Limbaugh was caught sneaking the sex enhancement Viagra (not his own script) into this country. I called that hypocrisy. As that thread unfolded, "AUTOBLEMIKE" WROTE, In Reese's first post he was quick to point out his (Limbaugh's) RX drug addiction. I did no such thing. ??Unless you can become addicted to Viagra??

But I digress. Today we learn who Limbaugh's conspiracy buddy Q anon is. According to a documentary aired by HBO, Q is Ron Watkins. WHO? https://news.yahoo.com/hbo-qanon-docuse ... 17080.html

Ron is the mixed race son of an US Army veteran in the Philippines. His dad Jim is well known for starting up a Japanese porn site.

How funny is it that white supremist's who insist pedophile liberals eat children are devoted to this man?

But don't believe me... read the article
The article is totally propaganda. But that’s typical from the liberal press.



User avatar
tc
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:57 pm

Re: Rush Limbaugh's buddy Q anon.

Post by tc » Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:02 am

TC Talks wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:48 am
Why isn't this in the Political Forum? It has nothing to do with Grand Rapids.
Rush was on the air in Grand Rapids for many years, and Reese is following-up on an earlier post from GR section.



georgetownt
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2020 11:18 am

Re: Rush Limbaugh's buddy Q anon.

Post by georgetownt » Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:30 am

Reese i guess you used to be something here in GR. This is so boring has as much interest as Hunter's laptop, Obama's birth certificate. Get over it Reese, Rush has passed away why does he continue to live rent free in your head?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk




Deleted User 15506

Re: Rush Limbaugh's buddy Q anon.

Post by Deleted User 15506 » Wed Mar 17, 2021 11:31 am

georgetownt wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:30 am
Reese i guess you used to be something here in GR. This is so boring has as much interest as Hunter's laptop, Obama's birth certificate. Get over it Reese, Rush has passed away why does he continue to live rent free in your head?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Reese sounds like a wack job.



TC Shuts Up
Posts: 2314
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 12:10 pm

Re: Rush Limbaugh's buddy Q anon.

Post by TC Shuts Up » Wed Mar 17, 2021 6:08 pm

My recollection is that Rush had a prescription for Viagra. After back surgery, he developed chronic pain, and had prescriptions from several doctors, all of which were prima facie valid. They had to invent a new crime called "doctor shopping" in order to charge him. No one else would have ever have been charged, especially after going to an addiction treatment center. Any other addict would be forgiven by the Left.

They tried to get Rush in every way they could think of. I wonder whether he was deliberately poisoned or infected with an agent which caused his hearing loss, which the perpetrators thought would end his career. You hate Putin so much, and he allegedly did stuff like that. Why do you think someone in the US wouldn't try it? They no longer have the moral high ground, especially the Left.

As far as that Fluke Flake, she claimed she used so much birth control that it cost so much, more than anyone could possibly use, and Rush opined that if she used that much, she must have been an extremely loose woman. Mathematically, the amount she reported it was costing was way out of line. You can only spend so much on birth control pills. You don't have to pay for more birth control pills just because you have more incidents of coitus, or even an abundant number of partners. The cost reaches a plateau. Fluke was obviously exaggerating the cost.


Disagreeing with Communists is NOT an impeachable offense.

Never eat Sushi past its expiration date.

Those who refuse to drain the swamp are doomed to drown in it.

georgetownt
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2020 11:18 am

Re: Rush Limbaugh's buddy Q anon.

Post by georgetownt » Wed Mar 17, 2021 8:42 pm



TC Shuts Up wrote: As far as that Fluke Flake, she claimed she used so much birth control that it cost so much, more than anyone could possibly use, and Rush opined that if she used that much, she must have been an extremely loose woman. Mathematically, the amount she reported it was costing was way out of line. You can only spend so much on birth control pills. You don't have to pay for more birth control pills just because you have more incidents of coitus, or even an abundant number of partners. The cost reaches a plateau. Fluke was obviously exaggerating the cost.
My thought for her claim her and her friends paid $500 a month for birth control showed no self control. That's the bed she made that's the criticism she should face.....

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk




Mega Hertz
Posts: 4265
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:09 pm
Location: Brighton

Re: Rush Limbaugh's buddy Q anon.

Post by Mega Hertz » Wed Mar 17, 2021 9:40 pm

One time I got cocky and tried to impress a girl by eating 10 White Castles in a row. All fun and games until I farted and wound up shitting my pants in her new car. Sometimes you just can't win!


"Internet is no more like radio than intravenous feeding is like fine dining."
-TurkeyTop

georgetownt
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2020 11:18 am

Re: Rush Limbaugh's buddy Q anon.

Post by georgetownt » Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:03 pm

Mega Hertz wrote:One time I got cocky and tried to impress a girl by eating 10 White Castles in a row. All fun and games until I farted and wound up shitting my pants in her new car. Sometimes you just can't win!
Try that with Taco Bell

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk




kager
Posts: 1387
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:10 pm
Location: GPS lost

Re: Rush Limbaugh's buddy Q anon.

Post by kager » Fri Mar 19, 2021 6:16 am

Image


"The problem with communication is the illusion that it has occurred."

User avatar
G G
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 5:08 pm
Location: Northville

Re: Rush Limbaugh's buddy Q anon.

Post by G G » Thu Mar 25, 2021 11:50 am

Reese K Rickards wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:22 am
In the Rush Limbaugh "Legacy" thread I point point Limbaugh verbally attacked a young woman for asking her insurance company to cover her birth control costs, while Limbaugh was caught sneaking the sex enhancement Viagra (not his own script) into this country. I called that hypocrisy. As that thread unfolded, "AUTOBLEMIKE" WROTE, In Reese's first post he was quick to point out his (Limbaugh's) RX drug addiction. I did no such thing. ??Unless you can become addicted to Viagra??

But I digress. Today we learn who Limbaugh's conspiracy buddy Q anon is. According to a documentary aired by HBO, Q is Ron Watkins. WHO? https://news.yahoo.com/hbo-qanon-docuse ... 17080.html

Ron is the mixed race son of an US Army veteran in the Philippines. His dad Jim is well known for starting up a Japanese porn site.

How funny is it that white supremist's who insist pedophile liberals eat children are devoted to this man?

But don't believe me... read the article
OLD NEWS

btw, it is (or at least was when I last talked to him) Jim.
G G wrote:
Sun Aug 16, 2020 11:18 pm
Q is Jim Watkins. He used Q as a way to create publicity for 8chan, now 8kun.top

Seriously
How did you not know this literal years ago??


Donald Trump was and is the best president this country has ever had. And he will return to glory as our leader again.

iwndry1015
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2021 1:39 pm

Re: Rush Limbaugh's buddy Q anon.

Post by iwndry1015 » Thu Mar 25, 2021 1:27 pm

That fact that ANYONE would believe one word of what's reported on Yahoo news is mind numbing. Reese, you clearly have an issue with Rush Limbaugh, as a matter of fact you appear to be borderline obsessed with him. Is it because he had achieved a level of success that you could have only ever dreamed of in your career? Did his views and opinions scare you?
Rush was an entertainer. No more no less. He's was as much of an entertainer as Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert. You should think about that. It's liberals like you that hate big scary black guns and Rush Limbaugh that is killing this country.



User avatar
Reese K Rickards
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2020 5:22 pm

Re: Rush Limbaugh's buddy Q anon.

Post by Reese K Rickards » Fri Mar 26, 2021 3:18 pm

Dear Laundry at quarter past ten:

U.S.Yahoo TV: 3/26/21 3pm.

"Hannity lashes out at Seth Meyers after comments about 'sociopaths' preventing gun control."

I believe that headline..... Is my mind numb? Nah... Am I obsessed with Rush Limbaugh? Nah. I hated having to listen to him the two years I worked at WOOD..

His level of success compared to mine?

There is modesty, and there is truth. I was half the morning show that put B-93 on the air, we were number one for years on the nations most powerful FM. I was on the ground floor planning Birthday Bash and in raising millions for abused and neglected children. I had a great 401K and I live in retirement comfortably. I have a great wife, super kids, and superb grand kids. I could go on and on, but there IS modesty.

It isn't me, it IS big black scary guns that are killing the country. I am a liberal. I am proud of it. How did you spend the stimulus money we sent you? I bought a radio control plane transmitter, we are buying rockers for the front porch of our (paid in cash) retirement home, (All made in America) and banked the rest. And.. I was never threatened by Limbaugh or Hannity. Just thoroughly disgusted.


If I Heart GR really wanted to save money, it would sublet two of it's three floors at 77 Monroe Center.

Autoblemike
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 1:41 am

Re: Rush Limbaugh's buddy Q anon.

Post by Autoblemike » Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:21 pm

Reese K Rickards wrote:
Fri Mar 26, 2021 3:18 pm
Dear Laundry at quarter past ten:

U.S.Yahoo TV: 3/26/21 3pm.

"Hannity lashes out at Seth Meyers after comments about 'sociopaths' preventing gun control."

I believe that headline..... Is my mind numb? Nah... Am I obsessed with Rush Limbaugh? Nah. I hated having to listen to him the two years I worked at WOOD..

His level of success compared to mine?

There is modesty, and there is truth. I was half the morning show that put B-93 on the air, we were number one for years on the nations most powerful FM. I was on the ground floor planning Birthday Bash and in raising millions for abused and neglected children. I had a great 401K and I live in retirement comfortably. I have a great wife, super kids, and superb grand kids. I could go on and on, but there IS modesty.

It isn't me, it IS big black scary guns that are killing the country. I am a liberal. I am proud of it. How did you spend the stimulus money we sent you? I bought a radio control plane transmitter, we are buying rockers for the front porch of our (paid in cash) retirement home, (All made in America) and banked the rest. And.. I was never threatened by Limbaugh or Hannity. Just thoroughly disgusted.
Reese, I am flattered that I inspired a new thread! It has been a few weeks so pardon me if I am late to the show... I am not sure if you can become addicted to viagra, I am not your age... you tell me? When I do hit that point and if I get ED, you can bet that I'll be popping them like candy! :)

First off, I challenge you to accept that you have biases and that your biases and your biases play a factor in what you perceive as truth. Secondly, you have to be OPEN to being wrong. That is not to say that you should be gullible and believe everything you hear... but you have to be open to having your mind changed. This transcends politics, humbling yourself, and approach any and all discussions with this mindset will set you up for some serious meaningful conversation. Which in the end, is what we need more of.

Here is my conclusion: The yahoo article is a hit piece.

I have heard about Q on and off for a while now... More recently, I noticed that the liberals on the board started using it as an insult so I had to look into it myself. One common trait I notice about a lot of liberals (not all of them) is they insult and character assassinates when they do not understand or when they disagree... So to all of you the accepting liberals on this board, thank you for insulting me and compelling me to research. I don't really care about Q, but what interests me is the media's hatred towards Q. Without diving into Q too much, in my opinion, it is a counter-narrative to the media. I do not know about all of the claims Q make (I am sure I will research when I get time), but one big takeaway is that the media is largely there for propaganda purposes. Opponents to Q AKA liberals and the media claim that Q is propaganda. So why are both sides calling each other propagandists?

I would like to point out that the author of yahoo an article is Named Nick Schager. I looked at Nick's LinkedIn profile and it looks like he is a guest writer for yahoo news. Nick is a full-time writer for the Daily Beast and Entertainment weekly. I was trying to determine the "who" behind the article. Based on all of Nick's work and reading his other articles it looks like you (Reese) and Nick are two peas. Here is my question... is it reasonable to assume that Nick is not able to write an unbiased article about Q as Q's basic message is that the media is dishonest propaganda (Q's message not mine)? I believe so.

Remember when I said Nick works for the Daily Beast? The Daily Beast is owned by News Week, News Week is owned by IBTimes, IBT times is a fully owned subsidiary of IBT media which is headquartered in Pakistan... Did you know that? I don't care if you are left, right, center, up or down... This person gets PAID from a company in PAKISTAN to push the NEWS to AMERICANS. Do you think that a writer that works for a Pakistan corporation would write an article supporting a theory that claims the media is corrupt?

To your final point about guns ruining this country... I am not a gun person, never have been, never will be. Personally, I do not like them.... but to say they are ruining our country is laughable. The most dangerous of all weapons is the control of information. Back before the 1400s, the catholic church had control... Why? Because they had the ability to read the bible and interpret it. After the printing press was invented people had the ability to consume their own information and the catholic church lost some power. Fast Forward to WWII, Hitler, and the Nazis began to control the media outlets (radio and print, look up Volkischer Beobachter). The Nazi movement took almost 2 decades to gain steam and slowly through conditioning and propaganda the German people willingly assisted in mass genocide. Could that happen today?

Let's circle back to our friend Nick the guest writer at yahoo news. Yahoo News is owned by Verizon... Verizon owns Huffpo, TC, and several others. AT&T owns HBO, CNN, CW Hulu ect. In fact, 90% of all media is owned by 6 or 7 parent companies. One thing they have in common is they seem to share the same narrative. Could it happen today? Yes, of course. Is it happening today? You tell me.

“It's Easier to Fool People Than It Is to Convince Them That They Have Been Fooled.” – Mark Twain.



Post Reply Previous topicNext topic