Acceptable registrations in the queue through June 3 at 5:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

More stupidity from Dana Nessel

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues in the State of Michigan. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
km1125
Posts: 3671
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel

Post by km1125 » Sun May 12, 2024 10:20 am

Bail Bonds wrote:
Sat May 11, 2024 2:04 pm
I'm deeply frustrated with Michigan AG Dana Nessel's handling of the Flint water case. Despite promises of justice and accountability, it feels like we're seeing little to no real action or consequences for those responsible. How much longer must the residents of Flint wait for justice? The lack of urgency and tangible results is disheartening and, frankly, unacceptable. We need a clear commitment to resolving this, not just more political posturing.

Given the lack of progress and accountability, it's becoming increasingly clear that perhaps AG Dana Nessel should not only be removed from office but also face legal consequences for her failures in the Flint water crisis.
Well, real accountability should start with how they got in that mess anyways and why they ever needed to get off the DWSD pipeline. Who voted in the folks that were in charge when all that was going on?



User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 8660
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel

Post by audiophile » Sun May 12, 2024 8:28 pm

Rate This wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pm
MWmetalhead wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pm
The suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.

I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
Calling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.
You cannot sue your way into prosperity, the monies received will be passed along to prices at the pump as a "environmental surcharge".

I contend this lawsuit is morally wrong. They sell a legal product that meets all necessary specifications that most of the citizens of the state need on a daily basis.

What's next - suing Kroger because they sell foods that make you fat and cost Medicaid more?
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!

User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10801
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel

Post by TC Talks » Sun May 12, 2024 10:06 pm

audiophile wrote:
Sun May 12, 2024 8:28 pm
What's next - suing Kroger because they sell foods that make you fat and cost Medicaid more?
That tactic worked with big tobacco.
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

Graham Wellington
Posts: 705
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:48 pm

Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel

Post by Graham Wellington » Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pm

Rate This wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pm
MWmetalhead wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pm
The suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.

I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
Calling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.
We're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.

User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 14591
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel

Post by Rate This » Mon May 13, 2024 3:39 pm

Graham Wellington wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pm
Rate This wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pm
MWmetalhead wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pm
The suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.

I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
Calling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.
We're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.
Do you really think they would go on a wild goose chase to make a statement? There’s no upside to losing it.

User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10801
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel

Post by TC Talks » Mon May 13, 2024 4:37 pm

Rate This wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:39 pm
Graham Wellington wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pm
Rate This wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pm
MWmetalhead wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pm
The suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.

I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
Calling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.
We're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.
Do you really think they would go on a wild goose chase to make a statement? There’s no upside to losing it.
She also is joining many other AG's. Strength in numbers.
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

Graham Wellington
Posts: 705
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:48 pm

Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel

Post by Graham Wellington » Mon May 13, 2024 4:40 pm

Rate This wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:39 pm
Graham Wellington wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pm
Rate This wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pm
MWmetalhead wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pm
The suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.

I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
Calling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.
We're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.
Do you really think they would go on a wild goose chase to make a statement? There’s no upside to losing it.
Dana Nessel? Yes, all day. She has proven that time and time again.

User avatar
MWmetalhead
Site Admin
Posts: 12349
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am

Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel

Post by MWmetalhead » Mon May 13, 2024 4:41 pm

audiophile wrote:
Sun May 12, 2024 8:28 pm
Rate This wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pm
MWmetalhead wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pm
The suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.

I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
Calling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.
You cannot sue your way into prosperity, the monies received will be passed along to prices at the pump as a "environmental surcharge".

I contend this lawsuit is morally wrong. They sell a legal product that meets all necessary specifications that most of the citizens of the state need on a daily basis.

What's next - suing Kroger because they sell foods that make you fat and cost Medicaid more?
💯

Beautifully stated.
Morgan Wallen is a piece of garbage.

Graham Wellington
Posts: 705
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:48 pm

Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel

Post by Graham Wellington » Mon May 13, 2024 4:41 pm

TC Talks wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 4:37 pm
Rate This wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:39 pm
Graham Wellington wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pm
Rate This wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pm
MWmetalhead wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pm
The suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.

I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
Calling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.
We're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.
Do you really think they would go on a wild goose chase to make a statement? There’s no upside to losing it.
She also is joining many other AG's. Strength in numbers.
That is her only hope - that a competent AG is involved that she can ride the coattails of. Something tells me the other AGs are nothing more than political activists as well.

User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10801
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel

Post by TC Talks » Mon May 13, 2024 5:57 pm

Graham Wellington wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 4:41 pm
TC Talks wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 4:37 pm
Rate This wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:39 pm
Graham Wellington wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pm
Rate This wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pm
MWmetalhead wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pm
The suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.

I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
Calling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.
We're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.
Do you really think they would go on a wild goose chase to make a statement? There’s no upside to losing it.
She also is joining many other AG's. Strength in numbers.
That is her only hope - that a competent AG is involved that she can ride the coattails of. Something tells me the other AGs are nothing more than political activists as well.
Or this is a good move for the betterment of society and you disagree.

Do you support the cigarette lawsuit or the Oxy lawsuit?
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

km1125
Posts: 3671
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel

Post by km1125 » Mon May 13, 2024 6:17 pm

TC Talks wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 4:37 pm
Rate This wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:39 pm
Graham Wellington wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pm
Rate This wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pm
MWmetalhead wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pm
The suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.

I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
Calling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.
We're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.
Do you really think they would go on a wild goose chase to make a statement? There’s no upside to losing it.
She also is joining many other radical leftist AG's. Strength in numbers.
FIFY

User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 14591
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel

Post by Rate This » Mon May 13, 2024 6:27 pm

km1125 wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 6:17 pm
TC Talks wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 4:37 pm
Rate This wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:39 pm
Graham Wellington wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pm
Rate This wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pm
MWmetalhead wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pm
The suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.

I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
Calling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.
We're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.
Do you really think they would go on a wild goose chase to make a statement? There’s no upside to losing it.
She also is joining many other radical leftist AG's. Strength in numbers.
FIFY
Radical leftist as a term is overplayed. It’s like saying they are members of team Easter bunny.

User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10801
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel

Post by TC Talks » Mon May 13, 2024 6:38 pm

Rate This wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 6:27 pm
km1125 wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 6:17 pm
TC Talks wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 4:37 pm
Rate This wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:39 pm
Graham Wellington wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pm
Rate This wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pm
MWmetalhead wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pm
The suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.

I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
Calling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.
We're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.
Do you really think they would go on a wild goose chase to make a statement? There’s no upside to losing it.
She also is joining many other radical leftist AG's. Strength in numbers.
FIFY
Radical leftist as a term is overplayed. It’s like saying they are members of team Easter bunny.
It must be some hot talk guy's go to phrase. You hear it parroted frequently.
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

km1125
Posts: 3671
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel

Post by km1125 » Mon May 13, 2024 7:34 pm

Rate This wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 6:27 pm
km1125 wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 6:17 pm
TC Talks wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 4:37 pm
Rate This wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:39 pm
Graham Wellington wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pm
Rate This wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pm
MWmetalhead wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pm
The suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.

I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
Calling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.
We're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.
Do you really think they would go on a wild goose chase to make a statement? There’s no upside to losing it.
She also is joining many other radical leftist AG's. Strength in numbers.
FIFY
Radical leftist as a term is overplayed. It’s like saying they are members of team Easter bunny.
Maybe.

But it's still an accurate term.

User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10801
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel

Post by TC Talks » Mon May 13, 2024 7:43 pm

You mean like the type that get pissed off and shoot their dog, then a goat?

The type who leaves death threats to the people Trump tells them to?

The type who believes in Bomb everyone and let God decide.
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic