Traverse City Hair Salon Rejects "Woke" Pronouns and Shit

[audiophile]

The Newsweek article, I shared, references a package of bills, and several of them bring up First Amendment issues.

You have to give some of those folks a break. Reading is a challenge for them.

No kidding.

There was a healthy debate years ago whether "hates crimes" legislation was needed at all. It was called "thought police". If someone says "I'm going kick your a$$" to be charged under one law, but "I'm going kick your ___(insert color here)___ a$$" is charged under another that seems like "thought police" to me. Both are threats, use the same law.

Another example is if parent brings their child to counselor because the child's peers are harassing them if they are straight or gay at school. The counselor exclaims you 10 years old you don't need to decide who you are at this age. The counselor then goes into some detail on it being unnecessary to decide. The counselor is accused trying to convert them to non-binary in violation of the law.

[Rate This]

The Newsweek article, I shared, references a package of bills, and several of them bring up First Amendment issues.

You have to give some of those folks a break. Reading is a challenge for them.

No kidding.

There was a healthy debate years ago whether "hates crimes" legislation was needed at all. It was called "thought police". If someone says "I'm going kick your a$$" to be charged under one law, but "I'm going kick your ___(insert color here)___ a$$" is charged under another that seems like "thought police" to me. Both are threats, use the same law.

Another example is if parent brings their child to counselor because the child's peers are harassing them if they are straight or gay at school. The counselor exclaims you 10 years old you don't need to decide who you are at this age. The counselor then goes into some detail on it being unnecessary to decide. The counselor is accused trying to convert them to non-binary in violation of the law.

Why is a counselor trying to sway them away from anything like that? That’s not the job of a counselor. Literally they listen and nod and try to be neutral.

I tried an experiment and tried to get a counselor to get out of that middle area and it’s not easily doable. Clearly you’ve never been counseled….

[km1125]

The Newsweek article, I shared, references a package of bills, and several of them bring up First Amendment issues.

You have to give some of those folks a break. Reading is a challenge for them.

No kidding.

There was a healthy debate years ago whether "hates crimes" legislation was needed at all. It was called "thought police". If someone says "I'm going kick your a$$" to be charged under one law, but "I'm going kick your ___(insert color here)___ a$$" is charged under another that seems like "thought police" to me. Both are threats, use the same law.

Another example is if parent brings their child to counselor because the child's peers are harassing them if they are straight or gay at school. The counselor exclaims you 10 years old you don't need to decide who you are at this age. The counselor then goes into some detail on it being unnecessary to decide. The counselor is accused trying to convert them to non-binary in violation of the law.

Why is a counselor trying to sway them away from anything like that? That’s not the job of a counselor. Literally they listen and nod and try to be neutral.

I tried an experiment and tried to get a counselor to get out of that middle area and it’s not easily doable. Clearly you’ve never been counseled….

If they're just "listening and nodding and try to be neutral" they're not really counseling anyone, are they?

[TC Talks]

The Newsweek article, I shared, references a package of bills, and several of them bring up First Amendment issues.

You have to give some of those folks a break. Reading is a challenge for them.

No kidding.

There was a healthy debate years ago whether "hates crimes" legislation was needed at all. It was called "thought police". If someone says "I'm going kick your a$$" to be charged under one law, but "I'm going kick your ___(insert color here)___ a$$" is charged under another that seems like "thought police" to me. Both are threats, use the same law.

Another example is if parent brings their child to counselor because the child's peers are harassing them if they are straight or gay at school. The counselor exclaims you 10 years old you don't need to decide who you are at this age. The counselor then goes into some detail on it being unnecessary to decide. The counselor is accused trying to convert them to non-binary in violation of the law.

Why is a counselor trying to sway them away from anything like that? That’s not the job of a counselor. Literally they listen and nod and try to be neutral.

I tried an experiment and tried to get a counselor to get out of that middle area and it’s not easily doable. Clearly you’ve never been counseled….

If they're just "listening and nodding and try to be neutral" they're not really counseling anyone, are they?

Jesus doesn't talk back either, yet you are instructed to listen.

[audiophile]

The Newsweek article, I shared, references a package of bills, and several of them bring up First Amendment issues.

You have to give some of those folks a break. Reading is a challenge for them.

No kidding.

There was a healthy debate years ago whether "hates crimes" legislation was needed at all. It was called "thought police". If someone says "I'm going kick your a$$" to be charged under one law, but "I'm going kick your ___(insert color here)___ a$$" is charged under another that seems like "thought police" to me. Both are threats, use the same law.

Another example is if parent brings their child to counselor because the child's peers are harassing them if they are straight or gay at school. The counselor exclaims you 10 years old you don't need to decide who you are at this age. The counselor then goes into some detail on it being unnecessary to decide. The counselor is accused trying to convert them to non-binary in violation of the law.

Why is a counselor trying to sway them away from anything like that? That’s not the job of a counselor. Literally they listen and nod and try to be neutral.

I tried an experiment and tried to get a counselor to get out of that middle area and it’s not easily doable. Clearly you’ve never been counseled….

If they're just "listening and nodding and try to be neutral" they're not really counseling anyone, are they?

LOL. I'm wondering if RT has had a good counselor.

I've had several different counselors over the years.

[Matt]

The Newsweek article, I shared, references a package of bills, and several of them bring up First Amendment issues.

You have to give some of those folks a break. Reading is a challenge for them.

No kidding.

There was a healthy debate years ago whether "hates crimes" legislation was needed at all. It was called "thought police". If someone says "I'm going kick your a$$" to be charged under one law, but "I'm going kick your ___(insert color here)___ a$$" is charged under another that seems like "thought police" to me. Both are threats, use the same law.

Another example is if parent brings their child to counselor because the child's peers are harassing them if they are straight or gay at school. The counselor exclaims you 10 years old you don't need to decide who you are at this age. The counselor then goes into some detail on it being unnecessary to decide. The counselor is accused trying to convert them to non-binary in violation of the law.

Why is a counselor trying to sway them away from anything like that? That’s not the job of a counselor. Literally they listen and nod and try to be neutral.

I tried an experiment and tried to get a counselor to get out of that middle area and it’s not easily doable. Clearly you’ve never been counseled….

If they're just "listening and nodding and try to be neutral" they're not really counseling anyone, are they?

LOL. I'm wondering if RT has had a good counselor.

I've had several different counselors over the years.

Hasn't done much good. Christian counselors are frauds.

[Rate This]

The Newsweek article, I shared, references a package of bills, and several of them bring up First Amendment issues.

You have to give some of those folks a break. Reading is a challenge for them.

No kidding.

There was a healthy debate years ago whether "hates crimes" legislation was needed at all. It was called "thought police". If someone says "I'm going kick your a$$" to be charged under one law, but "I'm going kick your ___(insert color here)___ a$$" is charged under another that seems like "thought police" to me. Both are threats, use the same law.

Another example is if parent brings their child to counselor because the child's peers are harassing them if they are straight or gay at school. The counselor exclaims you 10 years old you don't need to decide who you are at this age. The counselor then goes into some detail on it being unnecessary to decide. The counselor is accused trying to convert them to non-binary in violation of the law.

Why is a counselor trying to sway them away from anything like that? That’s not the job of a counselor. Literally they listen and nod and try to be neutral.

I tried an experiment and tried to get a counselor to get out of that middle area and it’s not easily doable. Clearly you’ve never been counseled….

If they're just "listening and nodding and try to be neutral" they're not really counseling anyone, are they?

They are allowing you to work out your own problems using a sounding board. If I wanted advice there’s google.

[audiophile]

The Newsweek article, I shared, references a package of bills, and several of them bring up First Amendment issues.

You have to give some of those folks a break. Reading is a challenge for them.

No kidding.

There was a healthy debate years ago whether "hates crimes" legislation was needed at all. It was called "thought police". If someone says "I'm going kick your a$$" to be charged under one law, but "I'm going kick your ___(insert color here)___ a$$" is charged under another that seems like "thought police" to me. Both are threats, use the same law.

Another example is if parent brings their child to counselor because the child's peers are harassing them if they are straight or gay at school. The counselor exclaims you 10 years old you don't need to decide who you are at this age. The counselor then goes into some detail on it being unnecessary to decide. The counselor is accused trying to convert them to non-binary in violation of the law.

Why is a counselor trying to sway them away from anything like that? That’s not the job of a counselor. Literally they listen and nod and try to be neutral.

I tried an experiment and tried to get a counselor to get out of that middle area and it’s not easily doable. Clearly you’ve never been counseled….

If they're just "listening and nodding and try to be neutral" they're not really counseling anyone, are they?

LOL. I'm wondering if RT has had a good counselor.

I've had several different counselors over the years.

Hasn't done much good. Christian counselors are frauds.

Well speaking of fraud, you stated you're likely voting for Biden in 2024 and you voted to for MI proposal 3.

As a conservative, that's malpractice Then there is your stash Jeb Bumper Stickers, TSK, TSK!

[Matt]

The Newsweek article, I shared, references a package of bills, and several of them bring up First Amendment issues.

You have to give some of those folks a break. Reading is a challenge for them.

No kidding.

There was a healthy debate years ago whether "hates crimes" legislation was needed at all. It was called "thought police". If someone says "I'm going kick your a$$" to be charged under one law, but "I'm going kick your ___(insert color here)___ a$$" is charged under another that seems like "thought police" to me. Both are threats, use the same law.

Another example is if parent brings their child to counselor because the child's peers are harassing them if they are straight or gay at school. The counselor exclaims you 10 years old you don't need to decide who you are at this age. The counselor then goes into some detail on it being unnecessary to decide. The counselor is accused trying to convert them to non-binary in violation of the law.

Why is a counselor trying to sway them away from anything like that? That’s not the job of a counselor. Literally they listen and nod and try to be neutral.

I tried an experiment and tried to get a counselor to get out of that middle area and it’s not easily doable. Clearly you’ve never been counseled….

If they're just "listening and nodding and try to be neutral" they're not really counseling anyone, are they?

LOL. I'm wondering if RT has had a good counselor.

I've had several different counselors over the years.

Hasn't done much good. Christian counselors are frauds.

Well speaking of fraud, you stated you're likely voting for Biden in 2024 and you voted to for MI proposal 3.

As a conservative, that's malpractice Then there is your stash Jeb Bumper Stickers, TSK, TSK!

A vote for prop 3 was a vote for freedom and limited government. I'd say that is a pretty conservative opinion. It's not "conservative" in the way someone that defines words in the sphere of toxic religion, but rather by using the actual definition.

Also, I've stated I'd vote for Biden if Trump is the Republican nominee. Trump is unfit to be in office again. If you can't see that, I can't help you.

[audiophile]

If you OK with Kamala Harris as president, as the most unfit for office, I can't help you either! Voting third party, as I did in 2016, is viable option too.

So you would be OK with eliminating premeditated murder as a crime, to reduce government and prison costs?

[Rate This]

If you OK with Kamala Harris as president, as the most unfit for office, I can't help you either! Voting third party, as I did in 2016, is viable option too.

So you would be OK with eliminating premeditated murder as a crime, to reduce government and prison costs?

Nobody is proposing we eliminate premeditated murder as a crime to save money.

[TC Talks]

Matt, welcome to the Socialist Republic

[teetoppz28]

... Socialist Republic

I do take great joy that tRumpanzees scream about SoCiAlIsM, yet I'll bet they enjoy the use of public roads, electric grids, communications infrastructure, treated water and sewage, etc.

[Rate This]

... Socialist Republic

I do take great joy that tRumpanzees scream about SoCiAlIsM, yet I'll bet they enjoy the use of public roads, electric grids, communications infrastructure, treated water and sewage, etc.

I'll bet they like the snowplow and the mail.

[km1125]

There are some things governments SHOULD do, but there are a LOT of things governments SHOULD NOT do.

I think the founders understood that pretty well, but we're mucking it up pretty good.