How To Pass A Background Check If You Want A Gun

[km1125]

Only in your fantasies was Obama an "existential threat to white men". He was a threat to the county, as evidenced by the numerous Executive Orders that were unconstitutional (and overturned).

You mean all ONE of them that was overturned?? The ONE regarding immigration? "Numerous" is a bit hyperbole, wouldn't you say?

I think you're off by about an order of magnitude. The real answer is somewhere between 9 and 13. And I would say that's "numerous" when compared to other presidents.

[teetoppz28]

Only in your fantasies was Obama an "existential threat to white men". He was a threat to the county, as evidenced by the numerous Executive Orders that were unconstitutional (and overturned).

You mean all ONE of them that was overturned?? The ONE regarding immigration? "Numerous" is a bit hyperbole, wouldn't you say?

I think you're off by about an order of magnitude. The real answer is somewhere between 9 and 13. And I would say that's "numerous" when compared to other presidents.

Here, I'll do the research for you:

Nine actually started under the administration of George W. Bush, but the Obama Justice Department handled the appellate process for those cases.

Three of the cases had nothing to do with Obama’s Executive Orders. In fact, in one case, the Obama administration wasn’t even a plaintiff or defendant. Rather the Justice Department simply filed a brief supporting the Massachusetts law being challenged.

One in which the courts blocked the implementation of the orders, ending in a 4–4 tie at the Supreme Court. That was regarding Obama’s orders regarding immigration.

The Internet makes research MUCH easier. So, rather than wildly guessing... look it up!

[TC Talks]

Only in your fantasies was Obama an "existential threat to white men". He was a threat to the county, as evidenced by the numerous Executive Orders that were unconstitutional (and overturned).

He was sending messages to the populace as a whole that they would not be able to protect themselves in the future if he got his way (regarding gun control). THAT would (and should) scare any American, which includes all minorities. They've already been disproportionally affected and at a severe disadvantage due to leftist policies in large cities.

You must not study politics very closely, Obama's terms wasn't extraordinary in the use of the tools he has available to him. Boehner and Chicken Neck Mitch both vowed to block anything Obama did, and I don't believe they saw eye to eye on anything. But it goes that way sometimes.

Obama was for the same gun management that is being discussed today. Do you recall anything that fell outside restrictions for rapid fire assault weapons and tighter background checks?

[km1125]

Only in your fantasies was Obama an "existential threat to white men". He was a threat to the county, as evidenced by the numerous Executive Orders that were unconstitutional (and overturned).

You mean all ONE of them that was overturned?? The ONE regarding immigration? "Numerous" is a bit hyperbole, wouldn't you say?

I think you're off by about an order of magnitude. The real answer is somewhere between 9 and 13. And I would say that's "numerous" when compared to other presidents.

Here, I'll do the research for you:

Nine actually started under the administration of George W. Bush, but the Obama Justice Department handled the appellate process for those cases.

Three of the cases had nothing to do with Obama’s Executive Orders. In fact, in one case, the Obama administration wasn’t even a plaintiff or defendant. Rather the Justice Department simply filed a brief supporting the Massachusetts law being challenged.

One in which the courts blocked the implementation of the orders, ending in a 4–4 tie at the Supreme Court. That was regarding Obama’s orders regarding immigration.

The Internet makes research MUCH easier. So, rather than wildly guessing... look it up!

And all of those nine... he neither rescinded with an executive order (which he easily could have done, if he disagreed with them), but also took on the defense of them once he got in office. At that point, he owned them.

[teetoppz28]

Only in your fantasies was Obama an "existential threat to white men". He was a threat to the county, as evidenced by the numerous Executive Orders that were unconstitutional (and overturned).

You mean all ONE of them that was overturned?? The ONE regarding immigration? "Numerous" is a bit hyperbole, wouldn't you say?

I think you're off by about an order of magnitude. The real answer is somewhere between 9 and 13. And I would say that's "numerous" when compared to other presidents.

Here, I'll do the research for you:

Nine actually started under the administration of George W. Bush, but the Obama Justice Department handled the appellate process for those cases.

Three of the cases had nothing to do with Obama’s Executive Orders. In fact, in one case, the Obama administration wasn’t even a plaintiff or defendant. Rather the Justice Department simply filed a brief supporting the Massachusetts law being challenged.

One in which the courts blocked the implementation of the orders, ending in a 4–4 tie at the Supreme Court. That was regarding Obama’s orders regarding immigration.

The Internet makes research MUCH easier. So, rather than wildly guessing... look it up!

And all of those nine... he neither rescinded with an executive order (which he easily could have done, if he disagreed with them), but also took on the defense of them once he got in office. At that point, he owned them.

So, by that logic: tRump owned them as well, since he didn't rescind them. Now Biden does. Extending that, Biden owns all of the executive orders ever written! WTF?!?!?

[MWmetalhead]

A good article regarding the nature and origin of guns used in the commission of crimes:

https://www.npr.org/2023/02/10/11539779 ... nce-report

[TC Talks]

A good article regarding the nature and origin of guns used in the commission of crimes:

https://www.npr.org/2023/02/10/11539779 ... nce-report

Thanks for posting this, I wonder why it took 20 years. Studying a problem is the first step to solve a problem.

[Mega Hertz]

My first executive order would be "no semi trucks in the left lane, Goddamnit!"

[Bryce]

A good article regarding the nature and origin of guns used in the commission of crimes:

https://www.npr.org/2023/02/10/11539779 ... nce-report

According to the article, the majority of gun crimes are committed with illegal guns, stolen guns, and by people not allowed to be in possession of a gun. Why aren't we focusing on that instead of background checks?

[km1125]

A good article regarding the nature and origin of guns used in the commission of crimes:

https://www.npr.org/2023/02/10/11539779 ... nce-report

According to the article, the majority of gun crimes are committed with illegal guns, stolen guns, and by people not allowed to be in possession of a gun. Why aren't we focusing on that instead of background checks?

So, in other words, that study really just confirmed what most of us already knew. Wonder how much money it cost to commission and distribute that study, and how many man-hours were consumed. Both resources that could have been put towards actually solving the problems we knew were already out there.