Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 16 at 11:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

Dana "Dereliction of Duty" Nessel won't investigate Whitmer

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues in the State of Michigan. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 13966
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Dana "Dereliction of Duty" Nessel won't investigate Whitmer

Post by Rate This » Wed Mar 17, 2021 4:59 pm

km1125 wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 3:17 pm
Seems like we had built SEVERAL temporary facilities. Why didn't we use those AT ALL???
They received a few patients, then the lockdown did it’s thing and the numbers came down. They were not meant for long term recovery.



User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10106
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: Dana "Dereliction of Duty" Nessel won't investigate Whitmer

Post by TC Talks » Wed Mar 17, 2021 6:04 pm

km1125 wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 3:17 pm
Seems like we had built SEVERAL temporary facilities. Why didn't we use those AT ALL???
There were no temporary rehabilitation facilities built. This all has to do with individuals who are out of the hospital after a covid incident in rehab.


“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

km1125
Posts: 3570
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: Dana "Dereliction of Duty" Nessel won't investigate Whitmer

Post by km1125 » Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:37 am

Rate This wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 4:59 pm
km1125 wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 3:17 pm
Seems like we had built SEVERAL temporary facilities. Why didn't we use those AT ALL???
They received a few patients, then the lockdown did it’s thing and the numbers came down. They were not meant for long term recovery.
They weren't originally intended for long term recovery, but when it was obvious they weren't needed for the hype we were hearing, they could have been repurposed to care for sick folks instead of sending them into hospitals or nursing homes. Folks could have stayed there until after they were no longer spewing out active virus particles.

But no, we just went back to the old practices.... turn people away at all the medical facilities and send them home until/unless they get critically ill with a significant percentage making it too late for medical care. The rest we sent back to the elder care facilities so their illness could potentially infect the caretakers and other residents.



User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 13966
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Dana "Dereliction of Duty" Nessel won't investigate Whitmer

Post by Rate This » Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:48 am

km1125 wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:37 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 4:59 pm
km1125 wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 3:17 pm
Seems like we had built SEVERAL temporary facilities. Why didn't we use those AT ALL???
They received a few patients, then the lockdown did it’s thing and the numbers came down. They were not meant for long term recovery.
They weren't originally intended for long term recovery, but when it was obvious they weren't needed for the hype we were hearing, they could have been repurposed to care for sick folks instead of sending them into hospitals or nursing homes. Folks could have stayed there until after they were no longer spewing out active virus particles.

But no, we just went back to the old practices.... turn people away at all the medical facilities and send them home until/unless they get critically ill with a significant percentage making it too late for medical care. The rest we sent back to the elder care facilities so their illness could potentially infect the caretakers and other residents.
For a successful prosecution you have to prove intent too... I doubt anybody was in a dark corner laughing maniacally while this was happening, thrilled that their mass murder plot was working perfectly...



km1125
Posts: 3570
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: Dana "Dereliction of Duty" Nessel won't investigate Whitmer

Post by km1125 » Thu Mar 18, 2021 11:55 am

Rate This wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:48 am
km1125 wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:37 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 4:59 pm
km1125 wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 3:17 pm
Seems like we had built SEVERAL temporary facilities. Why didn't we use those AT ALL???
They received a few patients, then the lockdown did it’s thing and the numbers came down. They were not meant for long term recovery.
They weren't originally intended for long term recovery, but when it was obvious they weren't needed for the hype we were hearing, they could have been repurposed to care for sick folks instead of sending them into hospitals or nursing homes. Folks could have stayed there until after they were no longer spewing out active virus particles.

But no, we just went back to the old practices.... turn people away at all the medical facilities and send them home until/unless they get critically ill with a significant percentage making it too late for medical care. The rest we sent back to the elder care facilities so their illness could potentially infect the caretakers and other residents.
For a successful prosecution you have to prove intent too... I doubt anybody was in a dark corner laughing maniacally while this was happening, thrilled that their mass murder plot was working perfectly...
How does that work in cases of negligent homicide or similar situations?



User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 13966
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Dana "Dereliction of Duty" Nessel won't investigate Whitmer

Post by Rate This » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:00 pm

km1125 wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 11:55 am
Rate This wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:48 am
km1125 wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:37 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 4:59 pm
km1125 wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 3:17 pm
Seems like we had built SEVERAL temporary facilities. Why didn't we use those AT ALL???
They received a few patients, then the lockdown did it’s thing and the numbers came down. They were not meant for long term recovery.
They weren't originally intended for long term recovery, but when it was obvious they weren't needed for the hype we were hearing, they could have been repurposed to care for sick folks instead of sending them into hospitals or nursing homes. Folks could have stayed there until after they were no longer spewing out active virus particles.

But no, we just went back to the old practices.... turn people away at all the medical facilities and send them home until/unless they get critically ill with a significant percentage making it too late for medical care. The rest we sent back to the elder care facilities so their illness could potentially infect the caretakers and other residents.
For a successful prosecution you have to prove intent too... I doubt anybody was in a dark corner laughing maniacally while this was happening, thrilled that their mass murder plot was working perfectly...
How does that work in cases of negligent homicide or similar situations?
Isn’t it that they have to prove that one should have known their actions were going to cause harm or death and they neglected to do anything differently?



km1125
Posts: 3570
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: Dana "Dereliction of Duty" Nessel won't investigate Whitmer

Post by km1125 » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:11 pm

Rate This wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:00 pm
km1125 wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 11:55 am
Rate This wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:48 am
km1125 wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:37 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 4:59 pm
km1125 wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 3:17 pm
Seems like we had built SEVERAL temporary facilities. Why didn't we use those AT ALL???
They received a few patients, then the lockdown did it’s thing and the numbers came down. They were not meant for long term recovery.
They weren't originally intended for long term recovery, but when it was obvious they weren't needed for the hype we were hearing, they could have been repurposed to care for sick folks instead of sending them into hospitals or nursing homes. Folks could have stayed there until after they were no longer spewing out active virus particles.

But no, we just went back to the old practices.... turn people away at all the medical facilities and send them home until/unless they get critically ill with a significant percentage making it too late for medical care. The rest we sent back to the elder care facilities so their illness could potentially infect the caretakers and other residents.
For a successful prosecution you have to prove intent too... I doubt anybody was in a dark corner laughing maniacally while this was happening, thrilled that their mass murder plot was working perfectly...
How does that work in cases of negligent homicide or similar situations?
Isn’t it that they have to prove that one should have known their actions were going to cause harm or death and they neglected to do anything differently?
BOOM! Case closed! There was PLENTY of evidence that: 1) That COVID is VERY contagious, 2) That COVID affects elder populations much more severely than any other populations, 3) That old folks are significant majority of the residents in elder care facilities 4) Elder folks can (and probably will) catch COVID from anyone else, including younger folks.

What was her reason for preventing FAMILY members from visiting their elder relatives in those facilities? Was there some knowledge or "science" that they were a risk in some way?



User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 13966
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Dana "Dereliction of Duty" Nessel won't investigate Whitmer

Post by Rate This » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:16 pm

km1125 wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:11 pm
Rate This wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:00 pm
km1125 wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 11:55 am
Rate This wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:48 am
km1125 wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:37 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 4:59 pm
km1125 wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 3:17 pm
Seems like we had built SEVERAL temporary facilities. Why didn't we use those AT ALL???
They received a few patients, then the lockdown did it’s thing and the numbers came down. They were not meant for long term recovery.
They weren't originally intended for long term recovery, but when it was obvious they weren't needed for the hype we were hearing, they could have been repurposed to care for sick folks instead of sending them into hospitals or nursing homes. Folks could have stayed there until after they were no longer spewing out active virus particles.

But no, we just went back to the old practices.... turn people away at all the medical facilities and send them home until/unless they get critically ill with a significant percentage making it too late for medical care. The rest we sent back to the elder care facilities so their illness could potentially infect the caretakers and other residents.
For a successful prosecution you have to prove intent too... I doubt anybody was in a dark corner laughing maniacally while this was happening, thrilled that their mass murder plot was working perfectly...
How does that work in cases of negligent homicide or similar situations?
Isn’t it that they have to prove that one should have known their actions were going to cause harm or death and they neglected to do anything differently?
BOOM! Case closed! There was PLENTY of evidence that: 1) That COVID is VERY contagious, 2) That COVID affects elder populations much more severely than any other populations, 3) That old folks are significant majority of the residents in elder care facilities 4) Elder folks can (and probably will) catch COVID from anyone else, including younger folks.

What was her reason for preventing FAMILY members from visiting their elder relatives in those facilities? Was there some knowledge or "science" that they were a risk in some way?
For that matter some of the bills regarding this that she vetoed were GASP! Bipartisan weren’t they?

Lucido should (and probably will) being charges based on any deaths that happened in his county that can be attributed to it.



User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10106
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: Dana "Dereliction of Duty" Nessel won't investigate Whitmer

Post by TC Talks » Thu Mar 18, 2021 7:00 pm

Someone has some cra cra ideas on this post... It's obvious which poster has a grasp on law and which doesn't.

The court system will sanction a prosecutor for far fetched charges.


“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 13966
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Dana "Dereliction of Duty" Nessel won't investigate Whitmer

Post by Rate This » Thu Mar 18, 2021 8:58 pm

TC Talks wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 7:00 pm
Someone has some cra cra ideas on this post... It's obvious which poster has a grasp on law and which doesn't.

The court system will sanction a prosecutor for far fetched charges.
The charges are hardly far fetched. They won’t even look at the situation and they are hiding the data about it. Whitmer and company are really oozing sleaze right about now. Especially with some of the BIPARTISAN bills that have been vetoed with flimsy excuses that don’t even pass the most cursory of smell tests.



Matt
Posts: 9853
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Where Ben Zonia couldn't cut it

Re: Dana "Dereliction of Duty" Nessel won't investigate Whitmer

Post by Matt » Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:04 pm

Rate This wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 8:58 pm
TC Talks wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 7:00 pm
Someone has some cra cra ideas on this post... It's obvious which poster has a grasp on law and which doesn't.

The court system will sanction a prosecutor for far fetched charges.
The charges are hardly far fetched. They won’t even look at the situation and they are hiding the data about it. Whitmer and company are really oozing sleaze right about now. Especially with some of the BIPARTISAN bills that have been vetoed with flimsy excuses that don’t even pass the most cursory of smell tests.
The one-time drunk driving expungement after 10 years that was overwhelmingly approved and she pocket vetoed comes to mind.


What's more pathetic: harassing an old man who is paying to do a radio show or supporting a grifter like Trump?

User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10106
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: Dana "Dereliction of Duty" Nessel won't investigate Whitmer

Post by TC Talks » Fri Mar 19, 2021 9:22 am

You're speaking in your own version of tongues this morning Matt. why don't we try real English so I understand what you're actually trying to say.


“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 13966
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Dana "Dereliction of Duty" Nessel won't investigate Whitmer

Post by Rate This » Fri Mar 19, 2021 9:53 am

TC Talks wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 9:22 am
You're speaking in your own version of tongues this morning Matt. why don't we try real English so I understand what you're actually trying to say.
You’re kidding right?



User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10106
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: Dana "Dereliction of Duty" Nessel won't investigate Whitmer

Post by TC Talks » Fri Mar 19, 2021 9:55 am

No I'm not kidding which conspiracy is he referring to now?


“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

Matt
Posts: 9853
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Where Ben Zonia couldn't cut it

Re: Dana "Dereliction of Duty" Nessel won't investigate Whitmer

Post by Matt » Fri Mar 19, 2021 10:03 am

TC Talks wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 9:55 am
No I'm not kidding which conspiracy is he referring to now?
It's not a conspiracy, it's fact: https://apnews.com/article/legislature- ... f6b4c68395
Whitmer vetoes bill to let 1-time DUI offenders clear record

By DAVID EGGERTJanuary 5, 2021

LANSING, Mich. (AP) — Gov. Gretchen Whitmer refused to sign a bill that would have let an estimated 200,000 one-time drunken drivers ask a judge to set aside their conviction, despite the measure’s broad bipartisan support in the Michigan Legislature.

The Democrat took no action on the expungement legislation Monday, allowing it to die when a 14-day review period expired. Her office gave no reason why.

The legislation had passed the Senate 32-5 and the House 96-8. A key Republican who helped guide the bill through the GOP-led Legislature expressed outrage.

“I am incredulous,” said Rep. Graham Filler, of DeWitt, who chaired the House Judiciary Committee last term. He said the governor’s pocket veto came “out of nowhere.” The bill was supported by top officials including Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel and state Supreme Court Chief Justice Bridget McCormack — both Democrats — and former House Speaker Lee Chatfield, a Republican.


What's more pathetic: harassing an old man who is paying to do a radio show or supporting a grifter like Trump?

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic