Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 16 at 11:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

Following to the logical conclusion is not "extreme"

Miss the posts from your favorite flame artist or troll who added little to no value to the Buzzboard? Read 'em here!
dchildress
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2022 2:02 pm

Following to the logical conclusion is not "extreme"

Post by dchildress » Wed Oct 26, 2022 10:12 am

Someone who believes abortion is murder will not have any exceptions, yet the "no exceptions" pro-life advocates get painted as "extreme."

If you believe slavery is wrong, you will also have no exceptions for it. That's not "extreme."

Those who believe the LGBTQIA+ agenda is moral and good, will want children to learn about it as early as they can. That's not extreme. If you believe the principles of fairness, respect, and equality are important, you'd want children to learn about them as early as possible. Again, not extreme.

Following to the logical conclusion is not "extreme," even though both major political parties say it is.



dchildress
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2022 2:02 pm

Re: Following to the logical conclusion is not "extreme"

Post by dchildress » Wed Oct 26, 2022 11:02 am

Rate This wrote:
Wed Oct 26, 2022 10:27 am
dchildress wrote:
Wed Oct 26, 2022 10:12 am
Someone who believes abortion is murder will not have any exceptions, yet the "no exceptions" pro-life advocates get painted as "extreme."

If you believe slavery is wrong, you will also have no exceptions for it. That's not "extreme."

Those who believe the LGBTQIA+ agenda is moral and good, will want children to learn about it as early as they can. That's not extreme. If you believe the principles of fairness, respect, and equality are important, you'd want children to learn about them as early as possible. Again, not extreme.

Following to the logical conclusion is not "extreme," even though both major political parties say it is.
GTFO.
Fine. I'm sorry I said "ass" in another thread. Sheesh. Grow up.



dchildress
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2022 2:02 pm

Re: Following to the logical conclusion is not "extreme"

Post by dchildress » Thu Oct 27, 2022 9:56 am

Mr. Peabody wrote:
Thu Oct 27, 2022 1:34 am
dchildress wrote:
Wed Oct 26, 2022 10:12 am
Someone who believes abortion is murder will not have any exceptions, yet the "no exceptions" pro-life advocates get painted as "extreme."

If you believe slavery is wrong, you will also have no exceptions for it. That's not "extreme."

Those who believe the LGBTQIA+ agenda is moral and good, will want children to learn about it as early as they can. That's not extreme. If you believe the principles of fairness, respect, and equality are important, you'd want children to learn about them as early as possible. Again, not extreme.

Following to the logical conclusion is not "extreme," even though both major political parties say it is.
Gibberish.
Happy to help you put a reasonable sentence together rather than writing gibberish. Just let me know!



dchildress
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2022 2:02 pm

Re: Following to the logical conclusion is not "extreme"

Post by dchildress » Thu Oct 27, 2022 12:00 pm

Someone who believes that a government solution is the best solution will obviously bristle against a private individual's choice. That's not "extreme." If someone believes the government (elected people or unelected people) knows better than they (the individual) do, the logical conclusion is that they would support government mandates as opposed to individual choice.

On the flip-side, if someone believes the individual knows what they need/want better than a top-down, inefficient, bloated, corrupt government, of course they're going to side with individual rights as opposed to government intervention.

Neither one of these stances are "extreme." They're simply the logical conclusion of the argument.



Post Reply Previous topicNext topic