Did I miss an inaccuracy in reporting that at least one person was dead? Did they actually ship actors to the hospital and lay them out on the floor at the scene and there’s nobody dead?Robert Faygo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 7:11 amWhile the events were unfolding during the 9:00 hour, it was only 4 and 7 that were wall-to-wall live. 2 joined in live at some point just before 10pm. Every time I clicked over to 62 before say about 10:30, it was just CBS programming. I only briefly looked in to channel 50s newscast at some point between 10 and 10:30 -- it was just a regular pre-packaged newscast.
Live news is an interesting beast - though all the stations continuously cautioned about inaccurate information, they couldn't help themselves and put plenty of it on their air. It was interesting to me that 2 drew a line about NOT reporting that the attack resulted in at least one fatality early on when 4 and 7 were reporting it as fact sourced by a member of MSU's board.
Acceptable registrations in the queue through May 6 at 7:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Coverage of the MSU campus shooting
Re: Coverage of the MSU campus shooting
- MWmetalhead
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12180
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am
Re: Coverage of the MSU campus shooting
I think the Bear, DE connection warrants additional due diligence. I think the Detroit News was perfectly justified in mentioning it. They didn't say he was linked to Croft; they simply said he spent time in the same town where Croft resides.
They were the first outlet to show the perp's photo, to speak with neighbors (to my knowledge), and to report fully on his criminal history. Those were the aspects of the article that I found informative.
They were the first outlet to show the perp's photo, to speak with neighbors (to my knowledge), and to report fully on his criminal history. Those were the aspects of the article that I found informative.
Morgan Wallen is a piece of garbage.
- Robert Faygo
- Posts: 730
- Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2020 5:26 pm
- Location: Van Down By The River
- Contact:
Re: Coverage of the MSU campus shooting
Exactly. It was strange to hear Roop and Taryn essentially call out 4 and 7 (in not so many words) about reporting that death was involved.Rate This wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 10:05 amDid I miss an inaccuracy in reporting that at least one person was dead? Did they actually ship actors to the hospital and lay them out on the floor at the scene and there’s nobody dead?Robert Faygo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 7:11 amWhile the events were unfolding during the 9:00 hour, it was only 4 and 7 that were wall-to-wall live. 2 joined in live at some point just before 10pm. Every time I clicked over to 62 before say about 10:30, it was just CBS programming. I only briefly looked in to channel 50s newscast at some point between 10 and 10:30 -- it was just a regular pre-packaged newscast.
Live news is an interesting beast - though all the stations continuously cautioned about inaccurate information, they couldn't help themselves and put plenty of it on their air. It was interesting to me that 2 drew a line about NOT reporting that the attack resulted in at least one fatality early on when 4 and 7 were reporting it as fact sourced by a member of MSU's board.
Wellllll... la de frickin da
Re: Coverage of the MSU campus shooting
In that context that’s really weird especially if they jumped on so late in the game. By 1030 or whenever the event itself was largely over and the hunt was on for the shooter.Robert Faygo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 10:40 amExactly. It was strange to hear Roop and Taryn essentially call out 4 and 7 (in not so many words) about reporting that death was involved.Rate This wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 10:05 amDid I miss an inaccuracy in reporting that at least one person was dead? Did they actually ship actors to the hospital and lay them out on the floor at the scene and there’s nobody dead?Robert Faygo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 7:11 amWhile the events were unfolding during the 9:00 hour, it was only 4 and 7 that were wall-to-wall live. 2 joined in live at some point just before 10pm. Every time I clicked over to 62 before say about 10:30, it was just CBS programming. I only briefly looked in to channel 50s newscast at some point between 10 and 10:30 -- it was just a regular pre-packaged newscast.
Live news is an interesting beast - though all the stations continuously cautioned about inaccurate information, they couldn't help themselves and put plenty of it on their air. It was interesting to me that 2 drew a line about NOT reporting that the attack resulted in at least one fatality early on when 4 and 7 were reporting it as fact sourced by a member of MSU's board.
- MWmetalhead
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12180
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am
Re: Coverage of the MSU campus shooting
Good reporting from NBC News:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/mi ... -rcna70579
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/mi ... -rcna70579
Morgan Wallen is a piece of garbage.
- Colonel Flagg
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: Coverage of the MSU campus shooting
Marie Osborn, and Chris Renwick co-anchored beginning at 9PM, dropping Fox News, and interrupting regular programming with updates. I assume they were both working from home, but it sounded seamless, with no glitches, unlike the nearly useless "WJR news anal-yst" cut-ins that occur during the day.Robert Faygo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 8:03 amHow did radio fare last night? I assume WWJ had enough resources to get some live coverage from East Lansing?
I made an attempt to listen to Paul W. Smith on WJR this morning on my drive surrounding the 6:30 AM news break. I couldn't do it. The commercial load surrounding the pukey Fox News Radio update and traffic/weather was unbearable to my attention deficit disorder listening style.
Marie and Chris did a good job, unscripted and conversational.
"Don't you knock when you enter a room?"
-
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2019 4:08 pm
- Location: Toledo, OH
Re: Coverage of the MSU campus shooting
I was listening to WWJ 950 early this morning. Initially, they were on commercial break when I tuned in. All of the coverage from then on was about the shooting, and they carried the midnight press conference in full, with no breaks for traffic or weather or commercials. They said that they were going to carry the 1:30 AM conference, but I turned it off at the point.
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2022 8:06 pm
Re: Coverage of the MSU campus shooting
Oh. My. God. CBS62 at 5pm was a train wreck. Both beginning live shots/lead stories weren’t ready and didnt play. They tossed to dead air. No communication with the poor anchors who must have been thinking “what the hell did I get into.” Its like they have no one who has ever produced a newscast. The poor anchors are capable, but clearly dont have the support team in place. Can anyone who works there chime in? This is how you debut yourself in the market? On such a big story?
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2022 8:06 pm
Re: Coverage of the MSU campus shooting
The 6pm lead live shot wasnt ready again?! Who is running the show there??
-
- Posts: 4270
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:09 pm
- Location: Brighton
Re: Coverage of the MSU campus shooting
I have an easier time getting Lansing stations OTA here than Detroit stations, so shoutout to WLNS. Can't get more local than that.
"Internet is no more like radio than intravenous feeding is like fine dining."
-TurkeyTop
-TurkeyTop
-
- Posts: 220
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 1:58 pm
Re: Coverage of the MSU campus shooting
Crisis actors? Ok Alex Jones.
-
- Posts: 827
- Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2019 2:36 am
Re: Coverage of the MSU campus shooting
I streamed WLNS most of the night. I thought they did an exceptional job despite a few technical diffs in trying to communicate with their reporters.
-
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:07 pm
- Location: go ahead, I'm listening
Re: Coverage of the MSU campus shooting
I agree with those folks saying WLNS doing a good job. the anchor's sat tight and didn't say anything that hadn't been confirmed. They waited till the authorities stated a death before saying or showing a count on screen. A few tech glitches with field communications but for the most part they rose to the sad occasion.
Re: Coverage of the MSU campus shooting
Newsman123 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 5:52 pmOh. My. God. CBS62 at 5pm was a train wreck. Both beginning live shots/lead stories weren’t ready and didnt play. They tossed to dead air. No communication with the poor anchors who must have been thinking “what the hell did I get into.” Its like they have no one who has ever produced a newscast. The poor anchors are capable, but clearly dont have the support team in place. Can anyone who works there chime in? This is how you debut yourself in the market? On such a big story?
That was an issue earlier in the newscast but got better later on. The 6 pm newscast was so much better. I really do think there was an intern in the control room today and when someone with more experience took over, things were a lot better. I do think they are doing things on the fly and are learning on the fly. Other than the technical issues, they did a great job.
From what I’ve seen, WWJ did way better than expected. If you watch their 7 pm newscast online, it’s so much more crisp. I also think they got someone more experienced to run the floor.
Re: Coverage of the MSU campus shooting
Interns don’t get within a country mile of a control room. Can they do anything wrong in your eyes?CircleWXYZ wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 9:42 pmNewsman123 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 5:52 pmOh. My. God. CBS62 at 5pm was a train wreck. Both beginning live shots/lead stories weren’t ready and didnt play. They tossed to dead air. No communication with the poor anchors who must have been thinking “what the hell did I get into.” Its like they have no one who has ever produced a newscast. The poor anchors are capable, but clearly dont have the support team in place. Can anyone who works there chime in? This is how you debut yourself in the market? On such a big story?
That was an issue earlier in the newscast but got better later on. The 6 pm newscast was so much better. I really do think there was an intern in the control room today and when someone with more experience took over, things were a lot better. I do think they are doing things on the fly and are learning on the fly. Other than the technical issues, they did a great job.
From what I’ve seen, WWJ did way better than expected. If you watch their 7 pm newscast online, it’s so much more crisp. I also think they got someone more experienced to run the floor.