No coverage of Jesse Smollet new charges

[km1125]

I don't think it warrants 'wall-to-wall' coverage, but I think they need to tell the 'other side of the story' especially when it was so biased in the original reporting.

[Rate This]

I don't think it warrants 'wall-to-wall' coverage, but I think they need to tell the 'other side of the story' especially when it was so biased in the original reporting.

What are you talking about?

[km1125]

I don't think it warrants 'wall-to-wall' coverage, but I think they need to tell the 'other side of the story' especially when it was so biased in the original reporting.

What are you talking about?

The coverage of Jesse Smollet new charges. What are you talking about?

[Rate This]

I don't think it warrants 'wall-to-wall' coverage, but I think they need to tell the 'other side of the story' especially when it was so biased in the original reporting.

What are you talking about?

The coverage of Jesse Smollet new charges. What are you talking about?

I can see that. But the initial coverage didn’t exactly laud him once it came out that he made it up.

[696lover]

The last media reporting was that he had the charges dropped due to his extraordinary services to the gay and Black communities. The fact that the free pass was improper, and some inquiry as to Michelle Obama's senior staffers and major presidential candidate Kamela's involvement should be a story, even if not wall to wall.

[Mega Hertz]

Oh, oh. I see. My fault. You must be newer here. Here, let me help you.

You're just in the wrong department is all. That falls under "Conspiracy: Liberal, left-wing, Democrat, etc". You can also find it under "Media: Fake, Mainstream, Leftist" or "Fair: Not to me". All of those subcategories can be found in the Political Potpourri section of the board.

Just click "Home", then scroll all the way down to "Political Potpourri", the very last section of the board. We appreciate your patronage and hope you enjoy your stay!

[EdWalker]

It's a Chicago story, not DTW.

[Rate This]

It's a Chicago story, not DTW.

Their argument is that since it had a minor national buzz when it happened that it should be covered equally now months after the minor buzz wore off and people forgot about it.

[n8fnr]

Seems like this was a really big story when it first happened but now the MSM seems to be not interested. This story stinks and I'm watching to see if heads fall in Chicago.

Well it was covered at a lot of places and Fox news. Is that MSM?

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/j ... es-scandal

https://www.google.com/search?q=jussie+ ... 66&bih=625

[G G]

I bet if it was yet another attempt to bring down OUR President, the liberal media would be ALL over it. Take that to the bank!