Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 30 at 9:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

Network tv switch, nearly 25 years later: who was the winner?

Discussion pertaining to Detroit, Ann Arbor, Port Huron, and SW Ontario
szmigiel
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2018 5:52 am

Re: Network tv switch, nearly 25 years later: who was the winner?

Post by szmigiel » Wed Mar 27, 2019 1:15 pm

But by this time next year they will be Channel 21



Deleted User 14935

Re: Network tv switch, nearly 25 years later: who was the winner?

Post by Deleted User 14935 » Wed Mar 27, 2019 1:54 pm

That’s true the repack, It will Be here soon.



User avatar
ZenithCKLW
Posts: 835
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 11:21 am
Location: Livonia, MI

Re: Network tv switch, nearly 25 years later: who was the winner?

Post by ZenithCKLW » Wed Mar 27, 2019 2:08 pm

I could be wrong, but wasn't there some FCC rule that said stations couldn't arbitrarily change their virtual channel number, even if to reflect their RF channel? In other words, it had to say 62, and additionally, don't all CBS O&O's use the "CBS #" format branding?

If anyone is even aware Ion exists, no one even cares Ion TV is 31, because no one cares about Ion TV. lol. I wouldn't be looking at them for ideas on how to run a ratings powerhouse.



fuzzpower
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2019 3:37 pm

Re: Network tv switch, nearly 25 years later: who was the winner?

Post by fuzzpower » Wed Mar 27, 2019 2:47 pm

Right. WPXD has about 14 viewers. WADL also doesn’t use a channel number and has about 25 viewers. Channel number doesn’t mean much these days especially with cable.



Deleted User 7620

Re: Network tv switch, nearly 25 years later: who was the winner?

Post by Deleted User 7620 » Wed Mar 27, 2019 3:10 pm

ZenithCKLW wrote:
Wed Mar 27, 2019 2:08 pm
I could be wrong, but wasn't there some FCC rule that said stations couldn't arbitrarily change their virtual channel number, even if to reflect their RF channel? In other words, it had to say 62, and additionally, don't all CBS O&O's use the "CBS #" format branding?

If anyone is even aware Ion exists, no one even cares Ion TV is 31, because no one cares about Ion TV. lol. I wouldn't be looking at them for ideas on how to run a ratings powerhouse.
That’s correct. I once asked about this, and the station said it had to use the 62 channel as it’s apart of the network mandate.



Editorcj
Posts: 355
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 3:49 pm

Re: Network tv switch, nearly 25 years later: who was the winner?

Post by Editorcj » Wed Mar 27, 2019 3:49 pm

Mort Meisner and Warren Pierce were pretty big losers in all that.



Deleted User 7620

Re: Network tv switch, nearly 25 years later: who was the winner?

Post by Deleted User 7620 » Wed Mar 27, 2019 4:41 pm

Editorcj wrote:
Wed Mar 27, 2019 3:49 pm
Mort Meisner and Warren Pierce were pretty big losers in all that.
Weren’t both let go by WJBK?



Editorcj
Posts: 355
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 3:49 pm

Re: Network tv switch, nearly 25 years later: who was the winner?

Post by Editorcj » Wed Mar 27, 2019 7:01 pm

Weren’t both let go by WJBK?
Yes, because Fox Corp. was a lot less forgiving of their shenanigans than New World who owned them when they were a CBS affiliate.



Deleted User 7620

Re: Network tv switch, nearly 25 years later: who was the winner?

Post by Deleted User 7620 » Wed Mar 27, 2019 7:46 pm

Editorcj wrote:
Wed Mar 27, 2019 7:01 pm
Weren’t both let go by WJBK?
Yes, because Fox Corp. was a lot less forgiving of their shenanigans than New World who owned them when they were a CBS affiliate.
Out of curiosity, what did they do to get them canned?



Editorcj
Posts: 355
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 3:49 pm

Re: Network tv switch, nearly 25 years later: who was the winner?

Post by Editorcj » Wed Mar 27, 2019 9:23 pm

Warren Pierce was getting cars from dealerships for a week at a time claiming to be doing reports and reviews on them, which he was not. He had his wife drive the cars so that no one at the station noticed Warren had a new ride every week. Rumor has it, that he did this for years and Mort covered for him. He was finally busted when BMW wanted a copy of his reports and took it to corporate when Warren, and then Mort as News Director did not provide the tape. So Warren was fired for fraudulent Payola and Mort was let go soon there after, bringing in Neal Goldstein as the new News Director.



Deleted User 7620

Re: Network tv switch, nearly 25 years later: who was the winner?

Post by Deleted User 7620 » Wed Mar 27, 2019 10:54 pm

Editorcj wrote:
Wed Mar 27, 2019 9:23 pm
Warren Pierce was getting cars from dealerships for a week at a time claiming to be doing reports and reviews on them, which he was not. He had his wife drive the cars so that no one at the station noticed Warren had a new ride every week. Rumor has it, that he did this for years and Mort covered for him. He was finally busted when BMW wanted a copy of his reports and took it to corporate when Warren, and then Mort as News Director did not provide the tape. So Warren was fired for fraudulent Payola and Mort was let go soon there after, bringing in Neal Goldstein as the new News Director.
Wow! That’s crazy. Never knew that happened.



Post Reply Previous topicNext topic