I agree with Trump: There is no need for the SCOTUS to fast track his immunity case

[Matt]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-supr ... l-counsel/

There's no need to expedite this case so long as Trump commits to dropping out of the race until this is resolved. Seems like an appropriate compromise...

[Rate This]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-supr ... l-counsel/

There's no need to expedite this case so long as Trump commits to dropping out of the race until this is resolved. Seems like an appropriate compromise...

He can then run in 2028 if he makes it that far. Excellent idea.

[Matt]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-supr ... l-counsel/

There's no need to expedite this case so long as Trump commits to dropping out of the race until this is resolved. Seems like an appropriate compromise...

He can then run in 2028 if he makes it that far. Excellent idea.

BMW is planning to write Trump in through at least 2060.

[teetoppz28]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-supr ... l-counsel/

There's no need to expedite this case so long as Trump commits to dropping out of the race until this is resolved. Seems like an appropriate compromise...

He can then run in 2028 if he makes it that far. Excellent idea.

BMW is planning to write Trump in through at least 2060.

bmw also plans on using weight (a vector) in place of mass (a scalar) for any physics formulas until 2061…

[bmw]

The both of you will be telling the same, tired jokes in here in 2060.

[Rate This]

The both of you will be telling the same, tired jokes in here in 2060.

Then it’s a stalemate because we know you’ll be writing him in forever.

[teetoppz28]

The both of you will be telling the same, tired jokes in here in 2060.

It’s not a joke… it’s a fact you don’t understand basic physics.

[Matt]

The both of you will be telling the same, tired jokes in here in 2060.

Is Trump a serious person to you?

[Taco]

They were meant for each other!

[bmw]

The both of you will be telling the same, tired jokes in here in 2060.

Then it’s a stalemate because we know you’ll be writing him in forever.

You'll be voting for Dementia Joe and Matt will be voting for somebody who has literally zero percent chance of winning. So I'm not sure either of you have any room to rag on me for voting for Trump this time around.

[Rate This]

The both of you will be telling the same, tired jokes in here in 2060.

Then it’s a stalemate because we know you’ll be writing him in forever.

You'll be voting for Dementia Joe and Matt will be voting for somebody who has literally zero percent chance of winning. So I'm not sure either of you have any room to rag on me for voting for Trump this time around.

The only one with verifiable dementia is Trump. He even endorsed two candidates in the same race.

[radioandtventhusiast]

The both of you will be telling the same, tired jokes in here in 2060.

Then it’s a stalemate because we know you’ll be writing him in forever.

You'll be voting for Dementia Joe and Matt will be voting for somebody who has literally zero percent chance of winning. So I'm not sure either of you have any room to rag on me for voting for Trump this time around.

The only one with verifiable dementia is Trump. He even endorsed two candidates in the same race.

Was that the one where he endorsed "Eric" in the Senate race in Missouri when two Erics were running?

[zzand]

The write in brings up an interesting question. If he is eventually taken off any state ballot would the write in count?

[TC Talks]

The write in brings up an interesting question. If he is eventually taken off any state ballot would the write in count?

Can his "likely" voters write?

[Taco]

The sad thing is that, when he doesn't win, he'll just be a media whore for every election afterwards.