Donald Trump found liable for fraud

[Matt]

https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/26/politics ... index.html

Another day, another embarrassment. To think, there are people that think this should be returned to office...

[MWmetalhead]

I think you meant to use this emoji for Trump:


The clown emoji is best reserved for our current President.

[Honeyman]

WITCH HUNT!!!

[Matt]

I think you meant to use this emoji for Trump:


The clown emoji is best reserved for our current President.

What does it say when we're headed for a vs round 2, and seems to have momentum???

[Honeyman]

What does it say when we're headed for a vs round 2, and seems to have momentum???

[Mega Hertz]

HILLARY TLAIB'S LAPTOP

[TC Talks]

WITCH HUNT!!!

I am anxious to hear from our resident conservative victim about the flaws in the judge's ruling.

[Matt]

WITCH HUNT!!!

I am anxious to hear from our resident conservative victim about the flaws in the judge's ruling.

I'm expecting graphs.

[Mega Hertz]

WITCH HUNT!!!

I am anxious to hear from our resident conservative victim about the flaws in the judge's ruling.

You say that like there's only one.

"Conservative victim" is repetitive.

[km1125]

It was a summary judgment, and the judge ignored the submissions by the defense in making his decision. It will probably be overturned on appeal.

I didn't read all the details, but it seems the documents in question included statements containing a “worthless clause”, not unlike the disclaimers used by all companies when talking about their stock prices or future company plans.

Something like ""These statements are not guarantees of future performance and undue reliance should not be placed on them. Such forward-looking statements necessarily involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual performance and financial results in future periods to differ materially from any projections of future performance or result expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

I don't know what the actual language was on the documents that were submitted to the financial institutions.

[Rate This]

It was a summary judgment, and the judge ignored the submissions by the defense in making his decision. It will probably be overturned on appeal.

I didn't read all the details, but it seems the documents in question included statements containing a “worthless clause”, not unlike the disclaimers used by all companies when talking about their stock prices or future company plans.

Something like ""These statements are not guarantees of future performance and undue reliance should not be placed on them. Such forward-looking statements necessarily involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual performance and financial results in future periods to differ materially from any projections of future performance or result expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

I don't know what the actual language was on the documents that were submitted to the financial institutions.

“I may not be worth it but if you try to fund me you could win bigly”…

[Mega Hertz]

[Lester The Nightfly]

It was a summary judgment, and the judge ignored the submissions by the defense in making his decision. It will probably be overturned on appeal.

I didn't read all the details, but it seems the documents in question included statements containing a “worthless clause”, not unlike the disclaimers used by all companies when talking about their stock prices or future company plans.

Something like ""These statements are not guarantees of future performance and undue reliance should not be placed on them. Such forward-looking statements necessarily involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual performance and financial results in future periods to differ materially from any projections of future performance or result expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

I don't know what the actual language was on the documents that were submitted to the financial institutions.

Didn’t read the details, don’t know the exact language. Just the kind of crack analysis we’ve come to expect from your likes. Don’t you have an online version of “The Oregon Trail” you could amuse yourself with and leave the adult chatter to the adults?

[TC Talks]

It was a summary judgment, and the judge ignored the submissions by the defense in making his decision. It will probably be overturned on appeal.

I didn't read all the details, but it seems the documents in question included statements containing a “worthless clause”, not unlike the disclaimers used by all companies when talking about their stock prices or future company plans.

Something like ""These statements are not guarantees of future performance and undue reliance should not be placed on them. Such forward-looking statements necessarily involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual performance and financial results in future periods to differ materially from any projections of future performance or result expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

I don't know what the actual language was on the documents that were submitted to the financial institutions.

Didn’t read the details, don’t know the exact language. Just the kind of crack analysis we’ve come to expect from your likes. Don’t you have an online version of “The Oregon Trail” you could amuse yourself with and leave the adult chatter to the adults?

I was promised Charts and Graphs. Looks like the wrong conservative victim responded.

[TC Talks]

I wonder how long he can keep claiming victimhood and being the subject of witchhunts? I guess we have entered "fooling some of the people all of the time" territory.

A lawyer for Mr. Trump, Christopher M. Kise, indicated that he would likely appeal the decision, which he called “outrageous” and “completely disconnected from the facts and governing law.” He said that the judge ignored an earlier appeals court ruling and “basic legal, accounting and business principles.”

Mr. Trump, for his part, noted that Justice Engoron was a Democrat and called him “deranged.”