Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 16 at 11:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

Ooops! Stay Classi-fied.

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10103
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: Ooops! Stay Classi-fied.

Post by TC Talks » Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:29 pm

..
Last edited by TC Talks on Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.


“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10103
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: Ooops! Stay Classi-fied.

Post by TC Talks » Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:30 pm

Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:13 pm
If you commit armed robbery at a party store and only get away with $10.00 should it be treated less seriously than the guy who got away with $1,000.00? That sure seems to be the bill of goods we're being sold by the left.
How many of your insurrection heroes are in prison now?


“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

Mega Hertz
Posts: 4265
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:09 pm
Location: Brighton

Re: Ooops! Stay Classi-fied.

Post by Mega Hertz » Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:57 pm

Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:13 pm
If you commit armed robbery at a party store and only get away with $10.00 should it be treated less seriously than the guy who got away with $1,000.00? That sure seems to be the bill of goods we're being sold by the left.
It will be, though.

One is petty larceny, the other is grand larceny. Fortunately, either way, you're gonna be punished.

Unless you're my wife's ex-husband. Guy could r*pe 3 women, kill a child, drive drunk into a daycare center and steal a grand from a blind man and STILL be home the next night.


"Internet is no more like radio than intravenous feeding is like fine dining."
-TurkeyTop

User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7141
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Ooops! Stay Classi-fied.

Post by Bryce » Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:57 pm

TC Talks wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:30 pm
Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:13 pm
If you commit armed robbery at a party store and only get away with $10.00 should it be treated less seriously than the guy who got away with $1,000.00? That sure seems to be the bill of goods we're being sold by the left.
How many of your insurrection heroes are in prison now?
deflect...deflect...deflect... Put your resume in to replace KJP yet?


New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7141
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Ooops! Stay Classi-fied.

Post by Bryce » Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:58 pm

Mega Hertz wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:57 pm
Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:13 pm
If you commit armed robbery at a party store and only get away with $10.00 should it be treated less seriously than the guy who got away with $1,000.00? That sure seems to be the bill of goods we're being sold by the left.
It will be, though.

One is petty larceny, the other is grand larceny. Fortunately, either way, you're gonna be punished.

Nope. They're both armed robbery no matter the amount.


New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

Mega Hertz
Posts: 4265
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:09 pm
Location: Brighton

Re: Ooops! Stay Classi-fied.

Post by Mega Hertz » Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:01 pm

Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:58 pm
Mega Hertz wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:57 pm
Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:13 pm
If you commit armed robbery at a party store and only get away with $10.00 should it be treated less seriously than the guy who got away with $1,000.00? That sure seems to be the bill of goods we're being sold by the left.
It will be, though.

One is petty larceny, the other is grand larceny. Fortunately, either way, you're gonna be punished.

Nope. They're both armed robbery no matter the amount.
That's on me, then. I missed the "armed" part!


"Internet is no more like radio than intravenous feeding is like fine dining."
-TurkeyTop

User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 13963
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Ooops! Stay Classi-fied.

Post by Rate This » Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:10 pm

Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:13 pm
If you commit armed robbery at a party store and only get away with $10.00 should it be treated less seriously than the guy who got away with $1,000.00? That sure seems to be the bill of goods we're being sold by the left.
If you use a stupid analogy that’s worth at least a day right?

Armed robbery is a terrible example. Why don’t we use the actual code? The subject matter at hand isn’t theoretical. The entire question hinges on intent and that strongly turns on their behavior. Immediately giving up the goods, searching your properties and offices high and low and fully cooperating suggests no intent.

Fighting tooth and nail and having your lawyers do illegal things to block the archives from getting to the materials suggests intent. Pretty cut and dry.



User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7141
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Ooops! Stay Classi-fied.

Post by Bryce » Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:33 pm

Rate This wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:10 pm
Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:13 pm
If you commit armed robbery at a party store and only get away with $10.00 should it be treated less seriously than the guy who got away with $1,000.00? That sure seems to be the bill of goods we're being sold by the left.
If you use a stupid analogy that’s worth at least a day right?

Armed robbery is a terrible example. Why don’t we use the actual code? The subject matter at hand isn’t theoretical. The entire question hinges on intent and that strongly turns on their behavior. Immediately giving up the goods, searching your properties and offices high and low and fully cooperating suggests no intent.

Fighting tooth and nail and having your lawyers do illegal things to block the archives from getting to the materials suggests intent. Pretty cut and dry.
The Presidential Records Act doesn't apply to a Vice President.


New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 13963
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Ooops! Stay Classi-fied.

Post by Rate This » Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:38 pm

Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:33 pm
Rate This wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:10 pm
Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:13 pm
If you commit armed robbery at a party store and only get away with $10.00 should it be treated less seriously than the guy who got away with $1,000.00? That sure seems to be the bill of goods we're being sold by the left.
If you use a stupid analogy that’s worth at least a day right?

Armed robbery is a terrible example. Why don’t we use the actual code? The subject matter at hand isn’t theoretical. The entire question hinges on intent and that strongly turns on their behavior. Immediately giving up the goods, searching your properties and offices high and low and fully cooperating suggests no intent.

Fighting tooth and nail and having your lawyers do illegal things to block the archives from getting to the materials suggests intent. Pretty cut and dry.
The Presidential Records Act doesn't apply to a Vice President.
That’s not the law I’m referring to… 18 U.S. Code 2071 is where I’m going with this:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071

Was the stuff intentionally or accidentally removed? That’s the crux of the issue. Neither Trump nor Biden were protected by the Presidential Records Act at the time that the materials were asked for or discovered respectively. So delete that from your repertoire… it’s not Germaine here.



User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10103
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: Ooops! Stay Classi-fied.

Post by TC Talks » Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:44 pm

Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:57 pm
TC Talks wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:30 pm
Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:13 pm
If you commit armed robbery at a party store and only get away with $10.00 should it be treated less seriously than the guy who got away with $1,000.00? That sure seems to be the bill of goods we're being sold by the left.
How many of your insurrection heroes are in prison now?
deflect...deflect...deflect... Put your resume in to replace KJP yet?
Not deflecting, all you need to do is acknowledge that Trump has committed worse crimes and hundreds of people around him have been convincted. You nit wits are on this one issue cause that's all there is...

Meanwhile you run like a bunch of cowards when your suckassed loser gets hit over and over.

So this isn't deflection, it's the truth.


“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7141
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Ooops! Stay Classi-fied.

Post by Bryce » Mon Jan 16, 2023 4:02 pm

Rate This wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:38 pm
Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:33 pm
Rate This wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:10 pm
Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:13 pm
If you commit armed robbery at a party store and only get away with $10.00 should it be treated less seriously than the guy who got away with $1,000.00? That sure seems to be the bill of goods we're being sold by the left.
If you use a stupid analogy that’s worth at least a day right?

Armed robbery is a terrible example. Why don’t we use the actual code? The subject matter at hand isn’t theoretical. The entire question hinges on intent and that strongly turns on their behavior. Immediately giving up the goods, searching your properties and offices high and low and fully cooperating suggests no intent.

Fighting tooth and nail and having your lawyers do illegal things to block the archives from getting to the materials suggests intent. Pretty cut and dry.
The Presidential Records Act doesn't apply to a Vice President.
That’s not the law I’m referring to… 18 U.S. Code 2071 is where I’m going with this:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071

Was the stuff intentionally or accidentally removed? That’s the crux of the issue. Neither Trump nor Biden were protected by the Presidential Records Act at the time that the materials were asked for or discovered respectively. So delete that from your repertoire… it’s not Germaine here.
And I contend that that code doesn't apply to a President and his own records.


New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10103
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: Ooops! Stay Classi-fied.

Post by TC Talks » Mon Jan 16, 2023 4:04 pm

Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 4:02 pm
Rate This wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:38 pm
Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:33 pm
Rate This wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:10 pm
Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:13 pm
If you commit armed robbery at a party store and only get away with $10.00 should it be treated less seriously than the guy who got away with $1,000.00? That sure seems to be the bill of goods we're being sold by the left.
If you use a stupid analogy that’s worth at least a day right?

Armed robbery is a terrible example. Why don’t we use the actual code? The subject matter at hand isn’t theoretical. The entire question hinges on intent and that strongly turns on their behavior. Immediately giving up the goods, searching your properties and offices high and low and fully cooperating suggests no intent.

Fighting tooth and nail and having your lawyers do illegal things to block the archives from getting to the materials suggests intent. Pretty cut and dry.
The Presidential Records Act doesn't apply to a Vice President.
That’s not the law I’m referring to… 18 U.S. Code 2071 is where I’m going with this:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071

Was the stuff intentionally or accidentally removed? That’s the crux of the issue. Neither Trump nor Biden were protected by the Presidential Records Act at the time that the materials were asked for or discovered respectively. So delete that from your repertoire… it’s not Germaine here.
And I contend that that code doesn't apply to a President and his own records.
You employ truthiness as much as you like...


“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 8546
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Ooops! Stay Classi-fied.

Post by audiophile » Mon Jan 16, 2023 4:06 pm

If this is true I expect Biden will be gone soon.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... r-AA16ppZU


Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!

bmw
Posts: 6723
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:02 am

Re: Ooops! Stay Classi-fied.

Post by bmw » Mon Jan 16, 2023 4:45 pm

audiophile wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 4:06 pm
If this is true I expect Biden will be gone soon.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... r-AA16ppZU
Image



User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 13963
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Ooops! Stay Classi-fied.

Post by Rate This » Mon Jan 16, 2023 5:31 pm

Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 4:02 pm
Rate This wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:38 pm
Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:33 pm
Rate This wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:10 pm
Bryce wrote:
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:13 pm
If you commit armed robbery at a party store and only get away with $10.00 should it be treated less seriously than the guy who got away with $1,000.00? That sure seems to be the bill of goods we're being sold by the left.
If you use a stupid analogy that’s worth at least a day right?

Armed robbery is a terrible example. Why don’t we use the actual code? The subject matter at hand isn’t theoretical. The entire question hinges on intent and that strongly turns on their behavior. Immediately giving up the goods, searching your properties and offices high and low and fully cooperating suggests no intent.

Fighting tooth and nail and having your lawyers do illegal things to block the archives from getting to the materials suggests intent. Pretty cut and dry.
The Presidential Records Act doesn't apply to a Vice President.
That’s not the law I’m referring to… 18 U.S. Code 2071 is where I’m going with this:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071

Was the stuff intentionally or accidentally removed? That’s the crux of the issue. Neither Trump nor Biden were protected by the Presidential Records Act at the time that the materials were asked for or discovered respectively. So delete that from your repertoire… it’s not Germaine here.
And I contend that that code doesn't apply to a President and his own records.
The records seized were not “his” property. They were government property and the law ceases to apply to him after he is president. So he was exposed in 2021. You can contend whatever you want to justify Trump… you’re factually incorrect however.



Post Reply Previous topicNext topic