Prop 3 is Evil $#!T

[Deleted User 9015]

I guess if you think 60 million U.S. aborted fetuses is "a working system" then I guess it was...

I think it is second worst travesty known to mankind, only the holocaust trumps it.

AS BMW said, PROP 3 It could have been one sentence, but we got a can of worms.

Impossible. If that were true, there would be a lot more empty parking spaces.

Could you imagine if we made that illegal? We would have a shortage on clothes hangers in no time

[audiophile]

Google it!

60 million since 1973 - it's like a million a year...was not going to cause shortages.

[Deleted User 9015]

Google it!

60 million since 1973 - it's like a million a year...was not going to cause shortages.

Oh since 50 years ago? What’s the big deal then?

[audiophile]

One abortion is too many.

If we killed a million puppy's a year, there would be a riot.

[Rate This]

One abortion is too many.

If we killed a million puppy's a year, there would be a riot.

That isn’t an analogy at all.

[MotorCityRadioFreak]

Tony Dungy just robo called my house as he was outraged at Prop 3. Whatever dude…

[Deleted User 9015]

One abortion is too many.

If we killed a million puppy's a year, there would be a riot.

Almost a million shelter animals are euthanized every year though?

[TC Talks]

One abortion is too many.

If we killed a million puppy's a year, there would be a riot.

Sounds like you shouldn't have an abortion. Cite your source on the 60 million abortions you're claiming.

[audiophile]

As soon as you provide links to all of your articles.

As you say, Google it!

PS I already researched it a while ago, it's closer to 63 million.

[Rate This]

As soon as you provide links to all of your articles.

As you say, Google it!

PS I already researched it a while ago, it's closer to 63 million.

I’m gonna ask again… how do you propose we care for an additional 63 million people? You need a lot more services to do so especially schools but also other services. I presume you’ll happily pay the higher taxes needed? Have you thought through fully the consequences of an additional 63 million people in the last 49 years being here?

[audiophile]

It's just the opposite, how are we going to pay for an aging population without younger workers?

63 million would have grown the economy, invented new things, became workers that supported the older generations and paid lots of taxes.

Maybe you need to think it through.

[Rate This]

It's just the opposite, how are we going to pay for an aging population without younger workers?

63 million would have grown the economy, invented new things, became workers that supported the older generations and paid lots of taxes.

Maybe you need to think it through.

The real problem was the governments post-war encouragement of the nuclear family and a stable population. That’s probably where we should start any criticism. These 63 million people are hypotheticals essentially. So sure… had they existed they would have EVENTUALLY gotten to where you suggest. But that takes 18 years of YOU supporting them.

[km1125]

One abortion is too many.

If we killed a million puppy's a year, there would be a riot.

And there's folks that stand by the "rather let a thousand guilty men go free than put one innocent man to death", yet are perfectly fine with terminating the life of a baby days or weeks before birth.

[Rate This]

One abortion is too many.

If we killed a million puppy's a year, there would be a riot.

And there's folks that stand by the "rather let a thousand guilty men go free than put one innocent man to death", yet are perfectly fine with terminating the life of a baby days or weeks before birth.

I have never met anyone in favor of that but apparently you have… can you direct me to such a person?

[Deleted User 9015]

It's just the opposite, how are we going to pay for an aging population without younger workers?

63 million would have grown the economy, invented new things, became workers that supported the older generations and paid lots of taxes.

Maybe you need to think it through.

The real problem was the governments post-war encouragement of the nuclear family and a stable population. That’s probably where we should start any criticism. These 63 million people are hypotheticals essentially. So sure… had they existed they would have EVENTUALLY gotten to where you suggest. But that takes 18 years of YOU supporting them.

Also consider the issue of socioeconomic mobility and who the people who get abortions usually are.

The women getting abortions are typically in lower income and education brackets, so you can expect the same from the children, so audio's argument is weak.