Acceptable registrations in the queue through May 6 at 7:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
The Secular Case against Abortion...
- audiophile
- Posts: 8606
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
The Secular Case against Abortion...
Science is clear that viable fetus is a separate life form and should be protected.
I was just holding an infant, and there is nothing more precious and sweet.
https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine ... -abortion/
I was just holding an infant, and there is nothing more precious and sweet.
https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine ... -abortion/
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6489
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: The Secular Case against Abortion...
There is no secular case. Women should have control over their bodies. Women are pissed off, and "no exceptions" Dixon is about ready to fully realize it in November.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
- audiophile
- Posts: 8606
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: The Secular Case against Abortion...
My guess - you didn't read it.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
- lidoshuffle
- Posts: 542
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 3:58 pm
Re: The Secular Case against Abortion...
Were you saying that about women having control over their bodies when it was Covid vaccination time for everyone?MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Sun Aug 14, 2022 9:57 pmThere is no secular case. Women should have control over their bodies. Women are pissed off, and "no exceptions" Dixon is about ready to fully realize it in November.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6489
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: The Secular Case against Abortion...
False equivalency. COVID vaccinations slows the spread of COVID. It is a public health issue due to contagion.lidoshuffle wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 5:12 pmWere you saying that about women having control over their bodies when it was Covid vaccination time for everyone?MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Sun Aug 14, 2022 9:57 pmThere is no secular case. Women should have control over their bodies. Women are pissed off, and "no exceptions" Dixon is about ready to fully realize it in November.
Abortion is simple; don’t want one, don’t get one!
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: The Secular Case against Abortion...
Would you like us to regulate spilling your seed? Each of those is a potential life you are wasting you realize…lidoshuffle wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 5:12 pmWere you saying that about women having control over their bodies when it was Covid vaccination time for everyone?MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Sun Aug 14, 2022 9:57 pmThere is no secular case. Women should have control over their bodies. Women are pissed off, and "no exceptions" Dixon is about ready to fully realize it in November.
Re: The Secular Case against Abortion...
How much regulation is on women and their pre-inseminated egg? That would be more of an equivalency.Rate This wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 9:33 pmWould you like us to regulate spilling your seed? Each of those is a potential life you are wasting you realize…lidoshuffle wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 5:12 pmWere you saying that about women having control over their bodies when it was Covid vaccination time for everyone?MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Sun Aug 14, 2022 9:57 pmThere is no secular case. Women should have control over their bodies. Women are pissed off, and "no exceptions" Dixon is about ready to fully realize it in November.
Re: The Secular Case against Abortion...
Actually a lot… these people are saying she forfeits all rights as soon as it’s used. She becomes little more than a living oven. That’s exactly what I’m arguing but for men. They are wasting potential life every time that rub one out. Several thousand of them might cure cancer or something along those lines EVERY TIME they do. I suspect the guys making these draconian decisions would object if there was suddenly a criminal penalty for jacking off.km1125 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 9:41 pmHow much regulation is on women and their pre-inseminated egg? That would be more of an equivalency.Rate This wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 9:33 pmWould you like us to regulate spilling your seed? Each of those is a potential life you are wasting you realize…lidoshuffle wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 5:12 pmWere you saying that about women having control over their bodies when it was Covid vaccination time for everyone?MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Sun Aug 14, 2022 9:57 pmThere is no secular case. Women should have control over their bodies. Women are pissed off, and "no exceptions" Dixon is about ready to fully realize it in November.
Re: The Secular Case against Abortion...
Please avoid the massage services Mr. Wellington has identified. Thanks.
You're never too old to learn something stupid.
Re: The Secular Case against Abortion...
You know that "pre" means, right? No one (as far as I know) is legislating what she can do with HER body or HER eggs. It's only after she contributed to creating ANOTHER LIFE that things become complicated. Then it's not just about HER, it's about her and that OTHER LIFE, which is only PARTLY her doing.Rate This wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 10:39 pmActually a lot… these people are saying she forfeits all rights as soon as it’s used. She becomes little more than a living oven. That’s exactly what I’m arguing but for men. They are wasting potential life every time that rub one out. Several thousand of them might cure cancer or something along those lines EVERY TIME they do. I suspect the guys making these draconian decisions would object if there was suddenly a criminal penalty for jacking off.km1125 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 9:41 pmHow much regulation is on women and their pre-inseminated egg? That would be more of an equivalency.Rate This wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 9:33 pmWould you like us to regulate spilling your seed? Each of those is a potential life you are wasting you realize…lidoshuffle wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 5:12 pmWere you saying that about women having control over their bodies when it was Covid vaccination time for everyone?MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Sun Aug 14, 2022 9:57 pmThere is no secular case. Women should have control over their bodies. Women are pissed off, and "no exceptions" Dixon is about ready to fully realize it in November.