Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 16 at 11:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

The Secular Case against Abortion...

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 8546
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

The Secular Case against Abortion...

Post by audiophile » Sun Aug 14, 2022 8:42 pm

Science is clear that viable fetus is a separate life form and should be protected.

I was just holding an infant, and there is nothing more precious and sweet.

https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine ... -abortion/


Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!

MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 6408
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: The Secular Case against Abortion...

Post by MotorCityRadioFreak » Sun Aug 14, 2022 9:57 pm

There is no secular case. Women should have control over their bodies. Women are pissed off, and "no exceptions" Dixon is about ready to fully realize it in November.


They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.

User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 8546
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: The Secular Case against Abortion...

Post by audiophile » Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:25 pm

My guess - you didn't read it.


Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!

User avatar
lidoshuffle
Posts: 526
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 3:58 pm

Re: The Secular Case against Abortion...

Post by lidoshuffle » Mon Aug 15, 2022 5:12 pm

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Sun Aug 14, 2022 9:57 pm
There is no secular case. Women should have control over their bodies. Women are pissed off, and "no exceptions" Dixon is about ready to fully realize it in November.
Were you saying that about women having control over their bodies when it was Covid vaccination time for everyone?



MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 6408
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: The Secular Case against Abortion...

Post by MotorCityRadioFreak » Mon Aug 15, 2022 6:44 pm

lidoshuffle wrote:
Mon Aug 15, 2022 5:12 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Sun Aug 14, 2022 9:57 pm
There is no secular case. Women should have control over their bodies. Women are pissed off, and "no exceptions" Dixon is about ready to fully realize it in November.
Were you saying that about women having control over their bodies when it was Covid vaccination time for everyone?
False equivalency. COVID vaccinations slows the spread of COVID. It is a public health issue due to contagion.

Abortion is simple; don’t want one, don’t get one!


They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.

User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 13962
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: The Secular Case against Abortion...

Post by Rate This » Mon Aug 15, 2022 9:33 pm

lidoshuffle wrote:
Mon Aug 15, 2022 5:12 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Sun Aug 14, 2022 9:57 pm
There is no secular case. Women should have control over their bodies. Women are pissed off, and "no exceptions" Dixon is about ready to fully realize it in November.
Were you saying that about women having control over their bodies when it was Covid vaccination time for everyone?
Would you like us to regulate spilling your seed? Each of those is a potential life you are wasting you realize…



km1125
Posts: 3570
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: The Secular Case against Abortion...

Post by km1125 » Mon Aug 15, 2022 9:41 pm

Rate This wrote:
Mon Aug 15, 2022 9:33 pm
lidoshuffle wrote:
Mon Aug 15, 2022 5:12 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Sun Aug 14, 2022 9:57 pm
There is no secular case. Women should have control over their bodies. Women are pissed off, and "no exceptions" Dixon is about ready to fully realize it in November.
Were you saying that about women having control over their bodies when it was Covid vaccination time for everyone?
Would you like us to regulate spilling your seed? Each of those is a potential life you are wasting you realize…
How much regulation is on women and their pre-inseminated egg? That would be more of an equivalency.



User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 13962
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: The Secular Case against Abortion...

Post by Rate This » Mon Aug 15, 2022 10:39 pm

km1125 wrote:
Mon Aug 15, 2022 9:41 pm
Rate This wrote:
Mon Aug 15, 2022 9:33 pm
lidoshuffle wrote:
Mon Aug 15, 2022 5:12 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Sun Aug 14, 2022 9:57 pm
There is no secular case. Women should have control over their bodies. Women are pissed off, and "no exceptions" Dixon is about ready to fully realize it in November.
Were you saying that about women having control over their bodies when it was Covid vaccination time for everyone?
Would you like us to regulate spilling your seed? Each of those is a potential life you are wasting you realize…
How much regulation is on women and their pre-inseminated egg? That would be more of an equivalency.
Actually a lot… these people are saying she forfeits all rights as soon as it’s used. She becomes little more than a living oven. That’s exactly what I’m arguing but for men. They are wasting potential life every time that rub one out. Several thousand of them might cure cancer or something along those lines EVERY TIME they do. I suspect the guys making these draconian decisions would object if there was suddenly a criminal penalty for jacking off.



User avatar
HD74
Posts: 583
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:53 pm
Location: SOMEWHERE BEHIND THE RACKS

Re: The Secular Case against Abortion...

Post by HD74 » Mon Aug 15, 2022 11:24 pm

Please avoid the massage services Mr. Wellington has identified. Thanks.


You're never too old to learn something stupid.

km1125
Posts: 3570
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: The Secular Case against Abortion...

Post by km1125 » Tue Aug 16, 2022 11:04 am

Rate This wrote:
Mon Aug 15, 2022 10:39 pm
km1125 wrote:
Mon Aug 15, 2022 9:41 pm
Rate This wrote:
Mon Aug 15, 2022 9:33 pm
lidoshuffle wrote:
Mon Aug 15, 2022 5:12 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Sun Aug 14, 2022 9:57 pm
There is no secular case. Women should have control over their bodies. Women are pissed off, and "no exceptions" Dixon is about ready to fully realize it in November.
Were you saying that about women having control over their bodies when it was Covid vaccination time for everyone?
Would you like us to regulate spilling your seed? Each of those is a potential life you are wasting you realize…
How much regulation is on women and their pre-inseminated egg? That would be more of an equivalency.
Actually a lot… these people are saying she forfeits all rights as soon as it’s used. She becomes little more than a living oven. That’s exactly what I’m arguing but for men. They are wasting potential life every time that rub one out. Several thousand of them might cure cancer or something along those lines EVERY TIME they do. I suspect the guys making these draconian decisions would object if there was suddenly a criminal penalty for jacking off.
You know that "pre" means, right? No one (as far as I know) is legislating what she can do with HER body or HER eggs. It's only after she contributed to creating ANOTHER LIFE that things become complicated. Then it's not just about HER, it's about her and that OTHER LIFE, which is only PARTLY her doing.



Post Reply Previous topicNext topic