Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 16 at 11:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
Chrocket87
Posts: 435
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 1:46 pm

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Post by Chrocket87 » Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:31 pm

How long until a certain anti-abortion, anti-cop poster resurfaces to rejoice in today’s news?



User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7141
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Post by Bryce » Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:55 pm

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:48 pm
Women are going to come out and vote
Don't you mean "menstruating person?"


New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

zzand
Posts: 1710
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:16 am
Location: right here

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Post by zzand » Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:09 pm

The President called on Congress to pass legislation protecting a woman's right to choose as I knew he would. I think Manchin and Sinema may surprise people with their vote. This isn't over quite yet.



MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 6408
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Post by MotorCityRadioFreak » Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:34 pm

Bryce wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:55 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:48 pm
Women are going to come out and vote
Don't you mean "menstruating person?"
Fuck you, asshole. I am done talking to all fuckwads today.


They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.

Matt
Posts: 9853
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Where Ben Zonia couldn't cut it

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Post by Matt » Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:38 pm

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:34 pm
Bryce wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:55 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:48 pm
Women are going to come out and vote
Don't you mean "menstruating person?"
Fuck you, asshole. I am done talking to all fuckwads today.
The ruling doesn't impact you at all.


What's more pathetic: harassing an old man who is paying to do a radio show or supporting a grifter like Trump?

bmw
Posts: 6729
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:02 am

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Post by bmw » Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:42 pm

Matt wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:38 pm
The ruling doesn't impact you at all.
Are we certain about that?

I don't know about you, but while I don't have a particularly strong opinion either way about this ruling (I don't believe that abortion is a Constitutional right, but I don't believe the issue should be left to the states either), I AM thoroughly enjoying watching the left in full-blown meltdown mode today. I mean, I know they're always in some kind of meltdown mode, but today seems special.



User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7141
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Post by Bryce » Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:42 pm

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:34 pm
Bryce wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:55 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:48 pm
Women are going to come out and vote
Don't you mean "menstruating person?"
Fuck you, asshole. I am done talking to all fuckwads today.
You're going to be pretty lonely not being able to talk to yourself at all.


New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7141
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Post by Bryce » Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:43 pm

Yeah you know it's funny, the same people melting down today for a limiting a woman's right to choose, didn't have the same opinion on whether people had a right to choose to conceal carry in New York


New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

Matt
Posts: 9853
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Where Ben Zonia couldn't cut it

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Post by Matt » Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:46 pm

bmw wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:42 pm
Matt wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:38 pm
The ruling doesn't impact you at all.
Are we certain about that?

I don't know about you, but while I don't have a particularly strong opinion either way about this ruling (I don't believe that abortion is a Constitutional right, but I don't believe the issue should be left to the states either), I AM thoroughly enjoying watching the left in full-blown meltdown mode today. I mean, I know they're always in some kind of meltdown mode, but today seems special.
It has certainly been interesting. I think abortion should be legal to an extent and regulated. Today's ruling pushes it to the states, but leftist emo people seem to think it was made illegal today.


What's more pathetic: harassing an old man who is paying to do a radio show or supporting a grifter like Trump?

Matt
Posts: 9853
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Where Ben Zonia couldn't cut it

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Post by Matt » Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:47 pm

Bryce wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:43 pm
Yeah you know it's funny, the same people melting down today for a limiting a woman's right to choose, didn't have the same opinion on whether people had a right to choose to conceal carry in New York
Excellent point! On top of that, these people are the same ones that were cheering lockdowns and forced cosplay for two years.


What's more pathetic: harassing an old man who is paying to do a radio show or supporting a grifter like Trump?

bmw
Posts: 6729
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:02 am

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Post by bmw » Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:51 pm

Matt wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:46 pm
It has certainly been interesting. I think abortion should be legal to an extent and regulated. Today's ruling pushes it to the states, but leftist emo people seem to think it was made illegal today.
I think we as a nation need to figure out a standard for determining when life starts, and that said standard should apply to all 50 states. I don't like the idea of 50 different definitions of what constitutes a life.



User avatar
Honeyman
Posts: 5776
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:44 pm

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Post by Honeyman » Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:53 pm

bmw wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:51 pm
I think we as a nation need to figure out a standard for determining when life starts, and that said standard should apply to all 50 states. I don't like the idea of 50 different definitions of what constitutes a life.
:rollin :lol: :rollin :lol: :rollin

GOOD LUCK WITH THAT!!


The censorship king from out of state.

User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 8546
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Post by audiophile » Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:57 pm

Matt wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:48 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:41 pm
Matt wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:34 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:20 pm
Matt wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:10 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:00 pm
Bryce wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:28 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:00 pm
Clarence Thomas also said as part of this ruling that non pro creative sex should be re evaluated. I hope you all enjoyed your BJ's because individual states now have the right to ban them. Fuck SCOTUS. Expand the court!
Don't get your panties in a wad. No other justice joined with Justice Thomas in that opinion. Ain't gonna happen.

Even if it did, and the state you lived in did ban sodomy, you're free to move to a state that allows nob gobbling to your hearts content.
It already happened today, you dumb fuck. Non pro creative sex is banned.
Abortion wasn't even banned. Quit being an overly emotional victim.
I'm saving this for November.
Looking forward to the red tsunami?
When you say red tsunami, I don't think you realize what you are asking for.
Big Republican wins.
Yep. To quote democrat operative James Carville: "it's the economy, stupid!"

Big red wave because the Biden Whitehouse is an abortion.

Seriously, only few will be thinking about abortion as top issue by then.


Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!

bmw
Posts: 6729
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:02 am

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Post by bmw » Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:09 pm

Honeyman wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:53 pm
bmw wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:51 pm
I think we as a nation need to figure out a standard for determining when life starts, and that said standard should apply to all 50 states. I don't like the idea of 50 different definitions of what constitutes a life.
:rollin :lol: :rollin :lol: :rollin

GOOD LUCK WITH THAT!!
I'm well aware that has no chance in hell of ever happening. Just as a purely philosophical matter, I believe this is how it should be done.

But yeah, this is along the lines of, could you imagine our current politicians trying to agree on, say, a brand new Constitution from scratch?



MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 6408
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Post by MotorCityRadioFreak » Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:09 pm

bmw wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:51 pm
Matt wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:46 pm
It has certainly been interesting. I think abortion should be legal to an extent and regulated. Today's ruling pushes it to the states, but leftist emo people seem to think it was made illegal today.
I think we as a nation need to figure out a standard for determining when life starts, and that said standard should apply to all 50 states. I don't like the idea of 50 different definitions of what constitutes a life.
Life begins at ejaculation, so stop jerking off.


They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic