Acceptable registrations in the queue through April 26 at 9:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
Deleted User 15783

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Post by Deleted User 15783 » Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:49 pm

bmw wrote: ↑
Fri Jul 08, 2022 8:59 am
 Talk about flipping the bird to the Supreme Court. Such an EO won't stand up in Court. SCOTUS returned this decision to elected officials, not to the President via executive order.
And this is, in my opinion anyway, what is right about the Scotus decisions on both abortion and the EPA decision.
Make the elected officials do their job.


Top
User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 8574
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (19-1392)

Post by audiophile » Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:45 am

Former Planned Parenthood clinic director: More would oppose abortion if they saw its 'barbarity'

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/forme ... ar-AAZpPFE

Wow this woman saw it all and switched sides.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Top
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Political Potpourri - U.S. and World”