Can You Define What A Woman Is?

[Bryce]

I imagine you can. Pretty much any third grade student could, But, it seems the latest Supreme Court nominee cannot.

In a follow up to question about the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s statement in U.S. v. Virginia that men and women are not “fungible” and that physical differences between the sexes “are enduring.” Sen. Marsha Blackburn asked this question, “Could you provide a definition for the word ’woman?" The nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson replied, “No, I can’t, not in this context. I’m not a biologist.”

Much is made about the fact that Judge Jackson is set to become "The first black woman to sit on the Supreme Court," Don't you find it odd that she is either unable or unwilling to define what a woman is, on record? Personally, I think she is unwilling do so for fear of angering the far left.

If Supreme Court Justices are unable to interpret simple words like "woman," can they be expected to look at the COTUS and interpret original intent of the words and meanings contained within it? Will her rulings be made in such a way as to not anger the far left?

To quote British feminist Kellie-Jay Keen when asked how a non-scientist can define the word “woman”: “I’m not a vet, but I know what a dog is.”

[Deleted User 15062]

The problem with this is that too many Americans live in 1845. Back then, a woman was anyone over a certain age, who could be married and was born with a va-jay-jay. People were taught that forever, until recently. The definition is more fluid nowadays. Laverne Cox is a woman, however, was not in earlier times. One does not have to even have a chromosome or a va-Jay-Jay to be a woman. I knew I was one early on, but was not born as. My gender was always "non-binary," until recent years. Those that know me in radio know this fact. Too bad too few still know me.

Since the definition of "woman" keeps changing, it might be wise not to be pinned down for "the other side" to oppress her (now or later on) with a current definition.

Open minds will bring peace.

[Bryce]

T

Since the definition of "woman" keeps changing,

Therein lies the problem. Changing definitions to fit a desired narrative.

Woman; an adult female. See how easy that was.

[zzand]

What everyone should remember is she has to keep her party happy in order to secure her seat on the court. Any nominee does, so they have to make sure their answers are in line with party doctrine. I am sure she knows the answer to the question but she had to give the right answer for her party, not the right answer period. Personally to me there are two answers to that question currently, those who were born a woman and those who transition to a woman.

[Ben Zonia]

Some musical interpretations.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHfBXHari34

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8jIr4fV8c8

[Ben Zonia]

What everyone should remember is she has to keep her party happy in order to secure her seat on the court. Any nominee does, so they have to make sure their answers are in line with party doctrine. I am sure she knows the answer to the question but she had to give the right answer for her party, not the right answer period. Personally to me there are two answers to that question currently, those who were born a woman and those who transition to a woman.

That's what the Supreme Court has BECOME. Not what the Supreme Court was intended to be.

The Supreme Court was supposed to interpret Laws based on Constitutional Principles, not be a small partisan population voting like a so called DEMOCRACY.

[bmw]

The easy way around her non-answer would have been these follow-up questions:

"Are you a woman?"

"What makes you a woman?"

How do you think she would have answered these?

[Matt]

Biden should have selected Judge Child's, but he bent over backwards for the far left.

[Bryce]

Biden should have selected Judge Child's, but he bent over backwards for the far left.

More like he bent over forward and handed them a bottle of lube. When you have people like Alan Deshowitz calling her testimony an "embarrassment," you know there is a problem there.

[Bryce]

I am sure she knows the answer to the question but she had to give the right answer for her party, not the right answer period.

So we can expect the same regarding her future rulings? That alone should disqualify her from a seat on the high court.

[Honeyman]

When you have people like Alan Deshowitz calling her testimony an "embarrassment," you know there is a problem there.

The same Alan Dershowitz who defended O.J
Simpson?

[Bryce]

The same Alan Dershowitz who defended O.J
Simpson?

Yeah? He also defended Harry Reems and Harvey Weinstein.
EVERYONE is entitled to representation in our court system.

He is a SCHOLAR of Constitutional Law but leans politically left and was a supporter of Hillary Clinton. Which in my opinion, gives even more weight to his comments on the matter.

[TC Talks]

Boy Bruce you're really going to be pissed when a black woman is confirmed.

[Matt]

Boy Bruce you're really going to be pissed when a black woman is confirmed.

Who is Bruce?

[TC Talks]

Boy Bruce you're really going to be pissed when a black woman is confirmed.

Who is Bruce?

Bryce (stupid autocorrect)