Acceptable registrations in the queue through June 3 at 5:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
CDC, wrong again
Re: CDC, wrong again
Nice presentation by some Canadians:
https://rumble.com/embed/voaxg5/?pub=4
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/
Here's the PDF version of the above presentation, if you'd rather do a self-guided tour:
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.o ... than-good/
https://rumble.com/embed/voaxg5/?pub=4
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/
Here's the PDF version of the above presentation, if you'd rather do a self-guided tour:
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.o ... than-good/
- Robert Faygo
- Posts: 731
- Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2020 5:26 pm
- Location: Van Down By The River
- Contact:
Re: CDC, wrong again
LOL - that's the equivalent of The Onion
The information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering medical, pharmaceutical, nutritional, mental health, legal, or any other professional advice or services. As such, it should not be used as a substitute for consultation and advice from a licensed professional in the specific field of interest who will provide recommendations based on your particular situation and factual background. Do not make any decisions based on the information contained or presented on this website without consulting an appropriate professional.
While we have made every attempt to ensure the information contained in this site has been obtained from reliable sources, Canadian Covid Care Alliance (CCCA) is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. All information in this site is provided “as is,” with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or of the results obtained from the use of this information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, as to the fitness for any particular purpose. Nothing herein shall to any extent substitute for the independent investigations and judgement of the reader. Information, laws and regulations are continually changing, and can be interpreted only in light of particular factual situations.
Wellllll... la de frickin da
Re: CDC, wrong again
Impeccably sourced, as usual.km1125 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 1:05 pmNice presentation by some Canadians:
https://rumble.com/embed/voaxg5/?pub=4
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/
Here's the PDF version of the above presentation, if you'd rather do a self-guided tour:
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.o ... than-good/
rumble.com
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rumble/
I don't mean to brag, but I just put a puzzle together in 1 day and the box said 2-4 years.
Re: CDC, wrong again
What an idiot. That's not the source of the presentation, just a method to deliver it.Turkeytop wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 1:17 pmImpeccably sourced, as usual.km1125 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 1:05 pmNice presentation by some Canadians:
https://rumble.com/embed/voaxg5/?pub=4
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/
Here's the PDF version of the above presentation, if you'd rather do a self-guided tour:
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.o ... than-good/
rumble.com
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rumble/
Re: CDC, wrong again
Why not use a more respectable source like QAnon?
I don't mean to brag, but I just put a puzzle together in 1 day and the box said 2-4 years.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6575
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: CDC, wrong again
Ahh Rumble....the site for people who get kicked off YouTube due to their blatant lying.km1125 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 1:05 pmNice presentation by some Canadians:
https://rumble.com/embed/voaxg5/?pub=4
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/
Here's the PDF version of the above presentation, if you'd rather do a self-guided tour:
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.o ... than-good/
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: CDC, wrong again
With the "spike" in COVID cases, I'm beginning to wonder....
Last year were were testing ~50,000 a day and when it was "bad" we were at or above a 10% confirmed positive rate. Many places last year you had to have confirmed symptoms in order to actually get a test. Many suspected there were a lot of folks who had COVID but never got tested, and many suspected there were a lot of COVID-positive folks who were asymptomatic and never got tested nor confirmed positive. Some antibody tests around the country showed that those asymptomatic folks or untested folks might be 300-600% more than the actual confirmed positives.
How many daily cases would we have had if we were testing EVERYBODY last year, instead of just those with symptoms? How many daily cases would we have right now if we were just testing folks with symptoms?
Last year were were testing ~50,000 a day and when it was "bad" we were at or above a 10% confirmed positive rate. Many places last year you had to have confirmed symptoms in order to actually get a test. Many suspected there were a lot of folks who had COVID but never got tested, and many suspected there were a lot of COVID-positive folks who were asymptomatic and never got tested nor confirmed positive. Some antibody tests around the country showed that those asymptomatic folks or untested folks might be 300-600% more than the actual confirmed positives.
How many daily cases would we have had if we were testing EVERYBODY last year, instead of just those with symptoms? How many daily cases would we have right now if we were just testing folks with symptoms?
Re: CDC, wrong again
The more complete a picture the better we can respond. That said… Would crime and the world outlook seem as bad as it looks without a 24/7 news media to tell you EVERYTHING that happens everyday everywhere? Ignorance is bliss. If there were fewer tests it wouldn’t seem as bad as it is nor would it if there were less constant coverage which isn’t healthy in the least bit.km1125 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 02, 2022 11:30 amWith the "spike" in COVID cases, I'm beginning to wonder....
Last year were were testing ~50,000 a day and when it was "bad" we were at or above a 10% confirmed positive rate. Many places last year you had to have confirmed symptoms in order to actually get a test. Many suspected there were a lot of folks who had COVID but never got tested, and many suspected there were a lot of COVID-positive folks who were asymptomatic and never got tested nor confirmed positive. Some antibody tests around the country showed that those asymptomatic folks or untested folks might be 300-600% more than the actual confirmed positives.
How many daily cases would we have had if we were testing EVERYBODY last year, instead of just those with symptoms? How many daily cases would we have right now if we were just testing folks with symptoms?