Take a look at a probate court roster some time.Mike Oxlong wrote: ↑Sat May 22, 2021 12:57 pmI suppose the point could be pondered that if you raised your children to be planning on a windfall after your demise ... just sayin'.TC Talks wrote: ↑Sat May 22, 2021 7:28 amThese bills certainly will be a liability of the father's Estate.craig11152 wrote: ↑Sat May 22, 2021 5:24 amI would be curious why an adult son is responsible for a parents debt
Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 16 at 11:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Got COVID? Enjoy your medical bills
Re: Got COVID? Enjoy your medical bills
“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Noam Chomsky
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
Re: Got COVID? Enjoy your medical bills
Not ONE dime could be spent during the Trump tenure without Nancy and her band of henchmen approving it. NOT ONE DIME. Blaming Trump for deficit spending is like blaming the 5 year old in line at the grocery store screaming for a candy bar, and getting it, for dad's gambling debts.TC Talks wrote: ↑Sun May 23, 2021 6:41 pmI don't recall you complaining about the h*ge deficit created during the Trump administration. Amazing that deficits all of a sudden become important.bmw wrote: ↑Sat May 22, 2021 9:46 amYou're one to talk - your political party is the one driving our entire country towards bankruptcy (I'll concede here that the Republicans aren't much better in this regard). And if you think you're going to close the deficit by raising taxes on the rich, well, good luck with that one.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: Got COVID? Enjoy your medical bills
I believe that most private insurers in michigan agreed to pay all covid-related bills for clients.
https://www.uppermichiganssource.com/20 ... -patients/
Of course the ninny occupying the governor's chair in lansing wants to pretend she did a damn thing, when its the private market stepping in.
https://www.uppermichiganssource.com/20 ... -patients/
Of course the ninny occupying the governor's chair in lansing wants to pretend she did a damn thing, when its the private market stepping in.
Donald Trump was and is the best president this country has ever had. And he will return to glory as our leader again.
Re: Got COVID? Enjoy your medical bills
G G wrote: ↑Sun May 23, 2021 10:02 pmI believe that most private insurers in michigan agreed to pay all covid-related bills for clients.
https://www.uppermichiganssource.com/20 ... -patients/
Of course the ninny occupying the Senate Majority Leader's chair in lansing wants to pretend he did a damn thing when its the governor stepping in.
Re: Got COVID? Enjoy your medical bills
hanson wrote: ↑Mon May 24, 2021 7:53 amG G wrote: ↑Sun May 23, 2021 10:02 pmI believe that most private insurers in michigan agreed to pay all covid-related bills for clients.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Three_Stooges
Of course the ninny occupying the Senate Majority Leader's chair in lansing wants to pretend he did a damn thing when its the governor stepping in.
Re: Got COVID? Enjoy your medical bills
The 2017 tax cuts blew a whole in the budget. The Republicans had the whole kit and kaboodle for the first two years of the administration. In other words Nancy and Co. were powerless.Bryce wrote: ↑Sun May 23, 2021 8:21 pmNot ONE dime could be spent during the Trump tenure without Nancy and her band of henchmen approving it. NOT ONE DIME. Blaming Trump for deficit spending is like blaming the 5 year old in line at the grocery store screaming for a candy bar, and getting it, for dad's gambling debts.TC Talks wrote: ↑Sun May 23, 2021 6:41 pmI don't recall you complaining about the h*ge deficit created during the Trump administration. Amazing that deficits all of a sudden become important.bmw wrote: ↑Sat May 22, 2021 9:46 amYou're one to talk - your political party is the one driving our entire country towards bankruptcy (I'll concede here that the Republicans aren't much better in this regard). And if you think you're going to close the deficit by raising taxes on the rich, well, good luck with that one.
Re: Got COVID? Enjoy your medical bills
Something missing here lately are the covid deniers. Users on this board were saying it's a hoax. It's no more serious than the flu. The statistics are inflated.
As recently as last fall they were saying it would disappear the day after the election. They were sort of right about that, except it's taking a few month after the election.
As recently as last fall they were saying it would disappear the day after the election. They were sort of right about that, except it's taking a few month after the election.
I started out with nothing and I still have most of it.
Re: Got COVID? Enjoy your medical bills
Who were these "deniers"? I think people correctly framed the severity and had concerns about their personal freedom for the most part. COVID is a killer, but the rate of death is on par with other sicknesses that we cope with year-to-year. It also leaves long-term or life-long impacts for many. No one serious denied that, but people were severely concerned about the impact that legislation influenced by COVID would have on economy and society.Turkeytop wrote: ↑Mon May 24, 2021 7:54 pmSomething missing here lately are the covid deniers. Users on this board were saying it's a hoax. It's no more serious than the flu. The statistics are inflated.
As recently as last fall they were saying it would disappear the day after the election. They were sort of right about that, except it's taking a few month after the election.
Here's the thing. It would be wrong to say that people should not respect the damage COVID could do, but it is also wrong to say that people must take every precaution possible to not get the disease. In life, you need to assume some risk. We have a public who is still uninformed about the condition, but that is because no one completely understands it. The beauty of a free society is that even if we do not understand all of the risks involved in activities, we can still decide on our own what our risk appetite is, and manage our own behavior.
And what if someone is wrong? They have to accept the consequences of their own actions. The government's problem here is that as new knowledge was created by researchers into the behavior of the disease, they never made an effort to inform the public. There was just more restrictions or less based on bar graphs. They refused to trust their own population to make decisions on their own. That's backwards.
Law-abiding citizens shouldn't have to work to gain the trust of their government, their government should work to gain the trust of the citizens.
Donald Trump was and is the best president this country has ever had. And he will return to glory as our leader again.
Re: Got COVID? Enjoy your medical bills
G G wrote: ↑Mon May 24, 2021 11:24 pmWho were these "deniers"? I think people correctly framed the severity and had concerns about their personal freedom for the most part. COVID is a killer, but the rate of death is on par with other sicknesses that we cope with year-to-year. It also leaves long-term or life-long impacts for many. No one serious denied that, but people were severely concerned about the impact that legislation influenced by COVID would have on economy and society.Turkeytop wrote: ↑Mon May 24, 2021 7:54 pmSomething missing here lately are the covid deniers. Users on this board were saying it's a hoax. It's no more serious than the flu. The statistics are inflated.
As recently as last fall they were saying it would disappear the day after the election. They were sort of right about that, except it's taking a few month after the election.
Here's the thing. It would be wrong to say that people should not respect the damage COVID could do, but it is also wrong to say that people must take every precaution possible to not get the disease. In life, you need to assume some risk. We have a public who is still uninformed about the condition, but that is because no one completely understands it. The beauty of a free society is that even if we do not understand all of the risks involved in activities, we can still decide on our own what our risk appetite is, and manage our own behavior.
And what if someone is wrong? They have to accept the consequences of their own actions. The government's problem here is that as new knowledge was created by researchers into the behavior of the disease, they never made an effort to inform the public. There was just more restrictions or less based on bar graphs. They refused to trust their own population to make decisions on their own. That's backwards.
Law-abiding citizens shouldn't have to work to gain the trust of their government, their government should work to gain the trust of the citizens.
I wasn't advocating for lockdowns or restrictions. I was simply stating that we had covid deniers among us on this board and now, at last, they've shut up.
I started out with nothing and I still have most of it.
Re: Got COVID? Enjoy your medical bills
A lot of those deniers cases were fueled directly by the actions of folks like Whitmer.Turkeytop wrote: ↑Tue May 25, 2021 12:37 amI wasn't advocating for lockdowns or restrictions. I was simply stating that we had covid deniers among us on this board and now, at last, they've shut up.G G wrote: ↑Mon May 24, 2021 11:24 pmWho were these "deniers"? I think people correctly framed the severity and had concerns about their personal freedom for the most part. COVID is a killer, but the rate of death is on par with other sicknesses that we cope with year-to-year. It also leaves long-term or life-long impacts for many. No one serious denied that, but people were severely concerned about the impact that legislation influenced by COVID would have on economy and society.Turkeytop wrote: ↑Mon May 24, 2021 7:54 pmSomething missing here lately are the covid deniers. Users on this board were saying it's a hoax. It's no more serious than the flu. The statistics are inflated.
As recently as last fall they were saying it would disappear the day after the election. They were sort of right about that, except it's taking a few month after the election.
Here's the thing. It would be wrong to say that people should not respect the damage COVID could do, but it is also wrong to say that people must take every precaution possible to not get the disease. In life, you need to assume some risk. We have a public who is still uninformed about the condition, but that is because no one completely understands it. The beauty of a free society is that even if we do not understand all of the risks involved in activities, we can still decide on our own what our risk appetite is, and manage our own behavior.
And what if someone is wrong? They have to accept the consequences of their own actions. The government's problem here is that as new knowledge was created by researchers into the behavior of the disease, they never made an effort to inform the public. There was just more restrictions or less based on bar graphs. They refused to trust their own population to make decisions on their own. That's backwards.
Law-abiding citizens shouldn't have to work to gain the trust of their government, their government should work to gain the trust of the citizens.
She would demand/require folks to isolate to protect themselves and others, yet she and other folks like her would violate those same requirements as if those requirements were really not the things that would make people safe.
Re: Got COVID? Enjoy your medical bills
I think there is some miscommunication here. I was saying there was zero, or maybe only a few, COVID deniers. What I was trying to say is that I don't believe that anyone here ever even denied the existence of the disease, but that they had different opinions on things such as severity, cause, or how effectively it is transferred.Turkeytop wrote: ↑Tue May 25, 2021 12:37 amG G wrote: ↑Mon May 24, 2021 11:24 pmWho were these "deniers"? I think people correctly framed the severity and had concerns about their personal freedom for the most part. COVID is a killer, but the rate of death is on par with other sicknesses that we cope with year-to-year. It also leaves long-term or life-long impacts for many. No one serious denied that, but people were severely concerned about the impact that legislation influenced by COVID would have on economy and society.Turkeytop wrote: ↑Mon May 24, 2021 7:54 pmSomething missing here lately are the covid deniers. Users on this board were saying it's a hoax. It's no more serious than the flu. The statistics are inflated.
As recently as last fall they were saying it would disappear the day after the election. They were sort of right about that, except it's taking a few month after the election.
Here's the thing. It would be wrong to say that people should not respect the damage COVID could do, but it is also wrong to say that people must take every precaution possible to not get the disease. In life, you need to assume some risk. We have a public who is still uninformed about the condition, but that is because no one completely understands it. The beauty of a free society is that even if we do not understand all of the risks involved in activities, we can still decide on our own what our risk appetite is, and manage our own behavior.
And what if someone is wrong? They have to accept the consequences of their own actions. The government's problem here is that as new knowledge was created by researchers into the behavior of the disease, they never made an effort to inform the public. There was just more restrictions or less based on bar graphs. They refused to trust their own population to make decisions on their own. That's backwards.
Law-abiding citizens shouldn't have to work to gain the trust of their government, their government should work to gain the trust of the citizens.
I wasn't advocating for lockdowns or restrictions. I was simply stating that we had covid deniers among us on this board and now, at last, they've shut up.
Donald Trump was and is the best president this country has ever had. And he will return to glory as our leader again.
Re: Got COVID? Enjoy your medical bills
G G wrote: ↑Tue May 25, 2021 3:02 amI think there is some miscommunication here. I was saying i have my head up my ass when I try to make a point. What I was trying to say is that I believe that many here denied the existence of the disease, and that they had different opinions on things such as severity, cause, or how effectively it is transferred.Turkeytop wrote: ↑Tue May 25, 2021 12:37 amG G wrote: ↑Mon May 24, 2021 11:24 pmWho were these "deniers"? I think people correctly framed the severity and had concerns about their personal freedom for the most part. COVID is a killer, but the rate of death is on par with other sicknesses that we cope with year-to-year. It also leaves long-term or life-long impacts for many. No one serious denied that, but people were severely concerned about the impact that legislation influenced by COVID would have on economy and society.Turkeytop wrote: ↑Mon May 24, 2021 7:54 pmSomething missing here lately are the covid deniers. Users on this board were saying it's a hoax. It's no more serious than the flu. The statistics are inflated.
As recently as last fall they were saying it would disappear the day after the election. They were sort of right about that, except it's taking a few month after the election.
Here's the thing. It would be wrong to say that people should not respect the damage COVID could do, but it is also wrong to say that people must take every precaution possible to not get the disease. In life, you need to assume some risk. We have a public who is still uninformed about the condition, but that is because no one completely understands it. The beauty of a free society is that even if we do not understand all of the risks involved in activities, we can still decide on our own what our risk appetite is, and manage our own behavior.
And what if someone is wrong? They have to accept the consequences of their own actions. The government's problem here is that as new knowledge was created by researchers into the behavior of the disease, they never made an effort to inform the public. There was just more restrictions or less based on bar graphs. They refused to trust their own population to make decisions on their own. That's backwards.
Law-abiding citizens shouldn't have to work to gain the trust of their government, their government should work to gain the trust of the citizens.
I wasn't advocating for lockdowns or restrictions. I was simply stating that we had covid deniers among us on this board and now, at last, they've shut up.
Re: Got COVID? Enjoy your medical bills
Turkeytop wrote: ↑Mon May 24, 2021 7:54 pmSomething missing here lately are the covid deniers. Users on this board were saying it's a hoax. It's no more serious than the flu. The statistics are inflated.
As recently as last fall they were saying it would disappear the day after the election. They were sort of right about that, except it's taking a few month after the election.
So, if I disagree with the policies of my government (which I do) that would be justification for telling dangerous lies that may cause people tp die?km1125 wrote: ↑Tue May 25, 2021 2:52 am
A lot of those deniers cases were fueled directly by the actions of folks like Whitmer.
She would demand/require folks to isolate to protect themselves and others, yet she and other folks like her would violate those same requirements as if those requirements were really not the things that would make people safe.
I started out with nothing and I still have most of it.