Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 30 at 9:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

WSJ: Lockdowns should not have happened

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
User avatar
Robert Faygo
Posts: 729
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2020 5:26 pm
Location: Van Down By The River
Contact:

Re: WSJ: Lockdowns should not have happened

Post by Robert Faygo » Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:42 pm

The only way to control mutations / variants is to prevent people from spreading the virus at all. The variants would have just happened quicker and there would be more of them if there weren't attempts to contain the spread.

It's why widespread use of vaccines is really the only way to speed up the process of getting over this thing.


Wellllll... la de frickin da

Matt
Posts: 9959
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Where Ben Zonia couldn't cut it

Re: WSJ: Lockdowns should not have happened

Post by Matt » Sun Mar 14, 2021 5:55 pm

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:39 pm
Matt, we have studies out of the UK and U-M(your alma mater) that say the Gretchen led lock downs saved lives. Academia doesn't agree that they were useless. States like Florida and Texas are still struggling with cases. And even if they don't lead to deaths, the great cost and "legacy" of COVID will be the long haulers and amount of long term disability faced. This will put a H*** strain on our PCP's. More than likely, we will see these cases of heart failure surge in the next 5-10 years. Right wing conservatives will blame obesity, but it will be COVID related. Just watch.
There is no research that lockdowns have done a GD thing. The U-M report was overstated and has been adjusted downwards. It was a calculation, filled with potentially faulty exceptions. Gretchen Whitmer’s actions have led to many people dying in nursing homes. Why is she refusing to release the records? She should be criminally charged - hopefully that is coming.


Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.

User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 14085
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: WSJ: Lockdowns should not have happened

Post by Rate This » Sun Mar 14, 2021 6:00 pm

Matt wrote:
Sun Mar 14, 2021 5:55 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:39 pm
Matt, we have studies out of the UK and U-M(your alma mater) that say the Gretchen led lock downs saved lives. Academia doesn't agree that they were useless. States like Florida and Texas are still struggling with cases. And even if they don't lead to deaths, the great cost and "legacy" of COVID will be the long haulers and amount of long term disability faced. This will put a H*** strain on our PCP's. More than likely, we will see these cases of heart failure surge in the next 5-10 years. Right wing conservatives will blame obesity, but it will be COVID related. Just watch.
There is no research that lockdowns have done a GD thing. The U-M report was overstated and has been adjusted downwards. It was a calculation, filled with potentially faulty exceptions. Gretchen Whitmer’s actions have led to many people dying in nursing homes. Why is she refusing to release the records? She should be criminally charged - hopefully that is coming.
What exactly are you going to criminally charge her specifically with? Underlings will take the fall but it’s hardly likely she will.



MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 6438
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: WSJ: Lockdowns should not have happened

Post by MotorCityRadioFreak » Mon Mar 15, 2021 6:49 am

Matt wrote:
Sun Mar 14, 2021 5:55 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:39 pm
Matt, we have studies out of the UK and U-M(your alma mater) that say the Gretchen led lock downs saved lives. Academia doesn't agree that they were useless. States like Florida and Texas are still struggling with cases. And even if they don't lead to deaths, the great cost and "legacy" of COVID will be the long haulers and amount of long term disability faced. This will put a H*** strain on our PCP's. More than likely, we will see these cases of heart failure surge in the next 5-10 years. Right wing conservatives will blame obesity, but it will be COVID related. Just watch.
There is no research that lockdowns have done a GD thing. The U-M report was overstated and has been adjusted downwards. It was a calculation, filled with potentially faulty exceptions. Gretchen Whitmer’s actions have led to many people dying in nursing homes. Why is she refusing to release the records? She should be criminally charged - hopefully that is coming.
And how is it her fault that nursing homes didn't have PPE? We had a dick of a president who only gave PPE to states he liked and kissed his ass. No mention of why said nursing home CEOs didn't have safety measures in place.


They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.

User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 14085
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: WSJ: Lockdowns should not have happened

Post by Rate This » Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:14 am

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Mon Mar 15, 2021 6:49 am
Matt wrote:
Sun Mar 14, 2021 5:55 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:39 pm
Matt, we have studies out of the UK and U-M(your alma mater) that say the Gretchen led lock downs saved lives. Academia doesn't agree that they were useless. States like Florida and Texas are still struggling with cases. And even if they don't lead to deaths, the great cost and "legacy" of COVID will be the long haulers and amount of long term disability faced. This will put a H*** strain on our PCP's. More than likely, we will see these cases of heart failure surge in the next 5-10 years. Right wing conservatives will blame obesity, but it will be COVID related. Just watch.
There is no research that lockdowns have done a GD thing. The U-M report was overstated and has been adjusted downwards. It was a calculation, filled with potentially faulty exceptions. Gretchen Whitmer’s actions have led to many people dying in nursing homes. Why is she refusing to release the records? She should be criminally charged - hopefully that is coming.
And how is it her fault that nursing homes didn't have PPE? We had a dick of a president who only gave PPE to states he liked and kissed his ass. No mention of why said nursing home CEOs didn't have safety measures in place.
The crime would probably be criminal negligence resulting in death or something like that... the argument is that the state should have known it was a boneheaded idea to stick COVID patients in nursing homes. When this started there really wasn’t the planning and knowledge on how to do this and the entire country fumbled through it. But Gretchen could shoot someone on Woodward Avenue and you’d excuse it so in your eyes she will never be even slightly in the wrong on this. She’s far from perfect and her “leadership” leaves a lot to be desired. She will struggle to be re-elected in 2022.



zzand
Posts: 1766
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:16 am
Location: right here

Re: WSJ: Lockdowns should not have happened

Post by zzand » Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:27 am

She basically did what the New York governor did and everyone is calling for his head, for that and the sex stuff, so why should she get a pass on doing the same thing? She shouldn't.



User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 14085
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: WSJ: Lockdowns should not have happened

Post by Rate This » Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:41 am

zzand wrote:
Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:27 am
She basically did what the New York governor did and everyone is calling for his head, for that and the sex stuff, so why should she get a pass on doing the same thing? She shouldn't.
It’s not the crime it’s the coverup fits well here I think...



zzand
Posts: 1766
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:16 am
Location: right here

Re: WSJ: Lockdowns should not have happened

Post by zzand » Mon Mar 15, 2021 8:23 am

Ahhh, gotcha...thanks



Matt
Posts: 9959
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Where Ben Zonia couldn't cut it

Re: WSJ: Lockdowns should not have happened

Post by Matt » Mon Mar 15, 2021 8:33 am

Rate This wrote:
Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:41 am
zzand wrote:
Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:27 am
She basically did what the New York governor did and everyone is calling for his head, for that and the sex stuff, so why should she get a pass on doing the same thing? She shouldn't.
It’s not the crime it’s the coverup fits well here I think...
To clarify, you are suggesting that a cover-up also happened in Michigan, correct?


Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.

zzand
Posts: 1766
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:16 am
Location: right here

Re: WSJ: Lockdowns should not have happened

Post by zzand » Mon Mar 15, 2021 8:56 am

It appears that way to me



MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 6438
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: WSJ: Lockdowns should not have happened

Post by MotorCityRadioFreak » Mon Mar 15, 2021 9:00 am

Rate This wrote:
Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:14 am
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Mon Mar 15, 2021 6:49 am
Matt wrote:
Sun Mar 14, 2021 5:55 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:39 pm
Matt, we have studies out of the UK and U-M(your alma mater) that say the Gretchen led lock downs saved lives. Academia doesn't agree that they were useless. States like Florida and Texas are still struggling with cases. And even if they don't lead to deaths, the great cost and "legacy" of COVID will be the long haulers and amount of long term disability faced. This will put a H*** strain on our PCP's. More than likely, we will see these cases of heart failure surge in the next 5-10 years. Right wing conservatives will blame obesity, but it will be COVID related. Just watch.
There is no research that lockdowns have done a GD thing. The U-M report was overstated and has been adjusted downwards. It was a calculation, filled with potentially faulty exceptions. Gretchen Whitmer’s actions have led to many people dying in nursing homes. Why is she refusing to release the records? She should be criminally charged - hopefully that is coming.
And how is it her fault that nursing homes didn't have PPE? We had a dick of a president who only gave PPE to states he liked and kissed his ass. No mention of why said nursing home CEOs didn't have safety measures in place.
The crime would probably be criminal negligence resulting in death or something like that... the argument is that the state should have known it was a boneheaded idea to stick COVID patients in nursing homes. When this started there really wasn’t the planning and knowledge on how to do this and the entire country fumbled through it. But Gretchen could shoot someone on Woodward Avenue and you’d excuse it so in your eyes she will never be even slightly in the wrong on this. She’s far from perfect and her “leadership” leaves a lot to be desired. She will struggle to be re-elected in 2022.
Wrong. I agreed with those who said she should not have tried to ban hydroxychloroquine in this state. A few of the restrictions could have been scaled back such as the ban on landscaping work and also purchasing lawn equipment etc.

But on the whole she has done a good job with the lock downs and also had an aggressive road rebuilding plan that was thwarted by the idiotic Pubs in the house and senate. I agree that she will have it difficult to come back in 2022. The RNC and Ronna Romney will certainly target her.


They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.

User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 14085
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: WSJ: Lockdowns should not have happened

Post by Rate This » Mon Mar 15, 2021 9:08 am

Matt wrote:
Mon Mar 15, 2021 8:33 am
Rate This wrote:
Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:41 am
zzand wrote:
Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:27 am
She basically did what the New York governor did and everyone is calling for his head, for that and the sex stuff, so why should she get a pass on doing the same thing? She shouldn't.
It’s not the crime it’s the coverup fits well here I think...
To clarify, you are suggesting that a cover-up also happened in Michigan, correct?
They won’t release they data will they? That suggests it is damning to them somehow...



km1125
Posts: 3607
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: WSJ: Lockdowns should not have happened

Post by km1125 » Mon Mar 15, 2021 10:18 am

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Mon Mar 15, 2021 6:49 am
Matt wrote:
Sun Mar 14, 2021 5:55 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:39 pm
Matt, we have studies out of the UK and U-M(your alma mater) that say the Gretchen led lock downs saved lives. Academia doesn't agree that they were useless. States like Florida and Texas are still struggling with cases. And even if they don't lead to deaths, the great cost and "legacy" of COVID will be the long haulers and amount of long term disability faced. This will put a H*** strain on our PCP's. More than likely, we will see these cases of heart failure surge in the next 5-10 years. Right wing conservatives will blame obesity, but it will be COVID related. Just watch.
There is no research that lockdowns have done a GD thing. The U-M report was overstated and has been adjusted downwards. It was a calculation, filled with potentially faulty exceptions. Gretchen Whitmer’s actions have led to many people dying in nursing homes. Why is she refusing to release the records? She should be criminally charged - hopefully that is coming.
And how is it her fault that nursing homes didn't have PPE? We had a dick of a president who only gave PPE to states he liked and kissed his ass. No mention of why said nursing home CEOs didn't have safety measures in place.
If you could go back and look at the data, you could see that the State had MILLIONS of various PPE in stock, reported on their own website. Why certain places might have run out was either due to state incompetence or poor inventory management locally.



Matt
Posts: 9959
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Where Ben Zonia couldn't cut it

Re: WSJ: Lockdowns should not have happened

Post by Matt » Mon Mar 15, 2021 11:15 am

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Mon Mar 15, 2021 9:00 am
Rate This wrote:
Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:14 am
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Mon Mar 15, 2021 6:49 am
Matt wrote:
Sun Mar 14, 2021 5:55 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:39 pm
Matt, we have studies out of the UK and U-M(your alma mater) that say the Gretchen led lock downs saved lives. Academia doesn't agree that they were useless. States like Florida and Texas are still struggling with cases. And even if they don't lead to deaths, the great cost and "legacy" of COVID will be the long haulers and amount of long term disability faced. This will put a H*** strain on our PCP's. More than likely, we will see these cases of heart failure surge in the next 5-10 years. Right wing conservatives will blame obesity, but it will be COVID related. Just watch.
There is no research that lockdowns have done a GD thing. The U-M report was overstated and has been adjusted downwards. It was a calculation, filled with potentially faulty exceptions. Gretchen Whitmer’s actions have led to many people dying in nursing homes. Why is she refusing to release the records? She should be criminally charged - hopefully that is coming.
And how is it her fault that nursing homes didn't have PPE? We had a dick of a president who only gave PPE to states he liked and kissed his ass. No mention of why said nursing home CEOs didn't have safety measures in place.
The crime would probably be criminal negligence resulting in death or something like that... the argument is that the state should have known it was a boneheaded idea to stick COVID patients in nursing homes. When this started there really wasn’t the planning and knowledge on how to do this and the entire country fumbled through it. But Gretchen could shoot someone on Woodward Avenue and you’d excuse it so in your eyes she will never be even slightly in the wrong on this. She’s far from perfect and her “leadership” leaves a lot to be desired. She will struggle to be re-elected in 2022.
Wrong. I agreed with those who said she should not have tried to ban hydroxychloroquine in this state. A few of the restrictions could have been scaled back such as the ban on landscaping work and also purchasing lawn equipment etc.

But on the whole she has done a good job with the lock downs and also had an aggressive road rebuilding plan that was thwarted by the idiotic Pubs in the house and senate. I agree that she will have it difficult to come back in 2022. The RNC and Ronna Romney will certainly target her.
Highest gas tax in the country was a good plan? That plan was less popular than covid.


Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.

Matt
Posts: 9959
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Where Ben Zonia couldn't cut it

Re: WSJ: Lockdowns should not have happened

Post by Matt » Sun Mar 28, 2021 8:58 am

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:39 pm
Matt, we have studies out of the UK and U-M(your alma mater) that say the Gretchen led lock downs saved lives. Academia doesn't agree that they were useless. States like Florida and Texas are still struggling with cases. And even if they don't lead to deaths, the great cost and "legacy" of COVID will be the long haulers and amount of long term disability faced. This will put a H*** strain on our PCP's. More than likely, we will see these cases of heart failure surge in the next 5-10 years. Right wing conservatives will blame obesity, but it will be COVID related. Just watch.
Texas is doing GREAT since they ended their mask mandate. You maskzis are NOT going to like this data: https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2021/03 ... as-n351435


Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic