Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 30 at 9:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

He Was Against It, Before He Was For It

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7144
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

He Was Against It, Before He Was For It

Post by Bryce » Tue Jan 26, 2021 8:49 am

All of a sudden Biden thinks travel bans are a good idea.
President Joe Biden signed restrictions Monday on travel to the United States to mitigate Covid-19 transmission.

The ban prevents most non-U.S. citizens from entry if they have recently been in South Africa, where a new strain of Covid-19 has been identified.

The limits affect non-U.S. citizens traveling from the United Kingdom, Ireland and much of Europe in what is known as the Schengen countries, which share a common visa process. Travelers from Brazil would also be affected.
Presidential Candidate Joe Biden said of Trump's travel bans...
Feb 1, 2020
“We are in the midst of a crisis with the coronavirus. We need to lead the way with science — not Donald Trump’s record of hysteria, xenophobia, and fear-mongering. He is the worst possible person to lead our country through a global health emergency.”
March 12, 2020
“A wall will not stop the coronavirus. Banning all travel from Europe — or any other part of the world — will not stop it. This disease could impact every nation and any person on the planet — and we need a plan to combat it.”
March 18, 2020
“Stop the xenophobic fear-mongering. Be honest. Take responsibility. Do your job.”
So evidently "xenophobic fear-mongering" is NOW the prudent thing to do since he's become president? Wondering if he's considering new border wall construction too?


New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

km1125
Posts: 3615
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: He Was Against It, Before He Was For It

Post by km1125 » Tue Jan 26, 2021 9:49 am

Bryce wrote:
Tue Jan 26, 2021 8:49 am
So evidently "xenophobic fear-mongering" is NOW the prudent thing to do since he's become president? Wondering if he's considering new border wall construction too?
Congress constructed an "impenetrable" fence (wall) around the Capitol in just a week. Why couldn't they have come up with the concept years ago to protect the southern border, and Trump would have never had a case for his campaign.



User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 14121
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: He Was Against It, Before He Was For It

Post by Rate This » Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:14 am

km1125 wrote:
Tue Jan 26, 2021 9:49 am
Bryce wrote:
Tue Jan 26, 2021 8:49 am
So evidently "xenophobic fear-mongering" is NOW the prudent thing to do since he's become president? Wondering if he's considering new border wall construction too?
Congress constructed an "impenetrable" fence (wall) around the Capitol in just a week. Why couldn't they have come up with the concept years ago to protect the southern border, and Trump would have never had a case for his campaign.
Because of the the geogra... oh never mind the reasons a wall on the southern border is not a realistic construction project for its entire length are way too high concept to explain to you. It’s really really obvious why a wall wouldn’t work.



User avatar
Turkeytop
Posts: 8879
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:27 pm

Re: He Was Against It, Before He Was For It

Post by Turkeytop » Tue Jan 26, 2021 3:21 pm

When the US is already the world epicenter for the pandemic, what does he hope to accomplish with a travel ban?


I started out with nothing and I still have most of it.

User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10333
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: He Was Against It, Before He Was For It

Post by TC Talks » Tue Jan 26, 2021 3:39 pm

Bryce,

Are you complaining that the President has adopted policies you like without any dog whistles or inciting Proud Boys?


“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7144
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: He Was Against It, Before He Was For It

Post by Bryce » Tue Jan 26, 2021 8:22 pm

TC Talks wrote:
Tue Jan 26, 2021 3:39 pm
Bryce,

Are you complaining that the President has adopted policies you like without any dog whistles or inciting Proud Boys?
Just pointing out that even though the "Orange Man Bad" and "Uncle Joe Good" mantra is hypocritical.

I am glad however, that although good old Uncle Joe doesn't have the ability for original thought, he does have the hubris to adopt Trump policy and claim them as his own.


New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

jadednihilist
Posts: 313
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2019 3:31 am

Re: He Was Against It, Before He Was For It

Post by jadednihilist » Tue Jan 26, 2021 8:48 pm

Bryce wrote:
Tue Jan 26, 2021 8:49 am
All of a sudden Biden thinks travel bans are a good idea.
President Joe Biden signed restrictions Monday on travel to the United States to mitigate Covid-19 transmission.

The ban prevents most non-U.S. citizens from entry if they have recently been in South Africa, where a new strain of Covid-19 has been identified.

The limits affect non-U.S. citizens traveling from the United Kingdom, Ireland and much of Europe in what is known as the Schengen countries, which share a common visa process. Travelers from Brazil would also be affected.
Presidential Candidate Joe Biden said of Trump's travel bans...
Feb 1, 2020
“We are in the midst of a crisis with the coronavirus. We need to lead the way with science — not Donald Trump’s record of hysteria, xenophobia, and fear-mongering. He is the worst possible person to lead our country through a global health emergency.”
March 12, 2020
“A wall will not stop the coronavirus. Banning all travel from Europe — or any other part of the world — will not stop it. This disease could impact every nation and any person on the planet — and we need a plan to combat it.”
March 18, 2020
“Stop the xenophobic fear-mongering. Be honest. Take responsibility. Do your job.”
So evidently "xenophobic fear-mongering" is NOW the prudent thing to do since he's become president? Wondering if he's considering new border wall construction too?
Quotes 1 and 3 don't directly address travel bans, but Trump's insistence on calling COVID-19 the "Chinese Virus," in spite of the science and journalistic community shifting from the "Wuhan virus," when COVID primarily impacted Wuhan to COVID/coronavirus. Trump has a long history of playing up racialized stereotypes to fire up his base, so it's not out of line to assume that was his motivation for the language here.

Quote 2 didn't age well. However, to Biden's credit, Trump's COVID strategy, including travel bans were ineffective, and by any metric, a colossal failure. A stronger, more comprehensive response early on, including potential travel bans, could have really reduced the impact on our country. I firmly believe that if Trump handled COVID more seriously, he could have easily won re-election.

I will reserve judgment on Biden's response to COVID as President until this summer, based off his administration's timeline for vaccinations and how well he responds to suppressing the spread of the more aggressive variants popping up in the UK, South Africa, and Brazil.


I'm here for a good, hearty debate, to agree and disagree respectfully, and commiserate on the current state of terrestrial radio.

User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10333
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: He Was Against It, Before He Was For It

Post by TC Talks » Wed Jan 27, 2021 11:56 am

Bryce wrote:
Tue Jan 26, 2021 8:22 pm
TC Talks wrote:
Tue Jan 26, 2021 3:39 pm
Bryce,

Are you complaining that the President has adopted policies you like without any dog whistles or inciting Proud Boys?
Just pointing out that even though the "Orange Man Bad" and "Uncle Joe Good" mantra is hypocritical.

I am glad however, that although good old Uncle Joe doesn't have the ability for original thought, he does have the hubris to adopt Trump policy and claim them as his own.
So you like the message but don't like the messenger. Got it, just a shallow complaint.


“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 14121
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: He Was Against It, Before He Was For It

Post by Rate This » Wed Jan 27, 2021 1:55 pm

TC Talks wrote:
Wed Jan 27, 2021 11:56 am
Bryce wrote:
Tue Jan 26, 2021 8:22 pm
TC Talks wrote:
Tue Jan 26, 2021 3:39 pm
Bryce,

Are you complaining that the President has adopted policies you like without any dog whistles or inciting Proud Boys?
Just pointing out that even though the "Orange Man Bad" and "Uncle Joe Good" mantra is hypocritical.

I am glad however, that although good old Uncle Joe doesn't have the ability for original thought, he does have the hubris to adopt Trump policy and claim them as his own.
So you like the message but don't like the messenger. Got it, just a shallow complaint.
All they have are nits to pick and shallow complaints.



paul8539
Posts: 1113
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 5:20 pm

Re: He Was Against It, Before He Was For It

Post by paul8539 » Thu Jan 28, 2021 8:56 pm

Apparently, travel bans against enemies is bad; travel bans because of a fancy cold virus is good.



User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10333
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: He Was Against It, Before He Was For It

Post by TC Talks » Thu Jan 28, 2021 8:58 pm

paul8539 wrote:
Thu Jan 28, 2021 8:56 pm
Apparently, travel bans against enemies is bad; travel bans because of a fancy cold virus is good.
Oh good another idiot who doesn't believe in covid.

You got it, we are a free economy and just because you don't like someone it doesn't mean the country does.


“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

paul8539
Posts: 1113
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 5:20 pm

Re: He Was Against It, Before He Was For It

Post by paul8539 » Thu Jan 28, 2021 9:11 pm

You are Wrong TC. I just believe that we are going too far with the pandemic. Some of this is getting to the point of 'irrational panic'.



Post Reply Previous topicNext topic