The Supreme Court has officially put the Texas election case suing Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, filed last night, on the docket:
Zero Hedge confirms this, noting that once a case is put on the docket, that means it will be heard. So Texas is off to a great start!
Acceptable registrations in the queue through June 3 at 5:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states
BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states
Really?!? I'll wait to see a more reputible source report this before I put my tail between my legs on this.
BTW, sent you a PM and I am never sure it got thru.
BTW, sent you a PM and I am never sure it got thru.
The censorship king from out of state.
Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
-
MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6575
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states
Wrong as usual: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... story.html
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states
You have the temerity to call me an idiot when you can't even get your cases straight? Do you see the word "Pennsylvania" in the story you link to? Different case sweetie.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Tue Dec 08, 2020 8:28 pmWrong as usual: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... story.html
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
-
MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6575
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states
The lawsuit mentions Pennsylvania in both links. Only one can be right.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states
Sigh....MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Tue Dec 08, 2020 8:44 pmThe lawsuit mentions Pennsylvania in both links. Only one can be right.
I think I'm going to change my screen name to Rick Dees.
Your Case...
Texas Case...Washington — The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday spurned a request from Republican allies of President Trump to decertify Pennsylvania's election results, foreclosing hopes from Mr. Trump and his backers that the justices would help deliver him a second term in the White House.
In a one-line unsigned order, the high court left intact a decision from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that tossed out a lawsuit led by Republican Congressman Mike Kelly challenging a 2019 law that expanded mail-in voting in the state.
"The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied," the order said. None of the nine justices indicated a dissent.
Texas Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton on Tuesday filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Supreme Court to invalidate presidential election results in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin and Michigan.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
-
MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6575
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states
I don't get why they would hear one case and not another for the same state. Makes no sense.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states
Don't worry. it's above your pay grade.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Tue Dec 08, 2020 9:01 pmI don't get why they would hear one case and not another for the same state. Makes no sense.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states
The song "Dis Gorilla" was the follow up to "Disco Duck"!!
Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states
They have not agreed to hear this case. I searched high and low. Some third rate blog claiming so doesn’t count. Texas does not have standing here either. They have to show they were injured somehow. It’s beyond a baseless suit. It makes a Hail Mary look like that play you run on first down. It’s a farce.Bryce wrote: ↑Tue Dec 08, 2020 9:02 pmDon't worry. it's above your pay grade.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Tue Dec 08, 2020 9:01 pmI don't get why they would hear one case and not another for the same state. Makes no sense.
Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states
Its sad that it took Texas standing up to all this for action to be taken. This is one hell of a domino to fall and I am glad to see it happen.
Donald Trump was and is the best president this country has ever had. And he will return to glory as our leader again.
Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.asp ... 2o155.htmlRate This wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 11:55 amThey have not agreed to hear this case. I searched high and low. Some third rate blog claiming so doesn’t count. Texas does not have standing here either. They have to show they were injured somehow. It’s beyond a baseless suit. It makes a Hail Mary look like that play you run on first down. It’s a farce.Bryce wrote: ↑Tue Dec 08, 2020 9:02 pmDon't worry. it's above your pay grade.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Tue Dec 08, 2020 9:01 pmI don't get why they would hear one case and not another for the same state. Makes no sense.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states
Just because it's on the docket doesn't mean they are going to hear the case, does it? They could say no, like they did yesterday to the Pennsylvania farce, or they could just ignore this, I believe.Bryce wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 12:58 pmhttps://www.supremecourt.gov/search.asp ... 2o155.htmlRate This wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 11:55 amThey have not agreed to hear this case. I searched high and low. Some third rate blog claiming so doesn’t count. Texas does not have standing here either. They have to show they were injured somehow. It’s beyond a baseless suit. It makes a Hail Mary look like that play you run on first down. It’s a farce.Bryce wrote: ↑Tue Dec 08, 2020 9:02 pmDon't worry. it's above your pay grade.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Tue Dec 08, 2020 9:01 pmI don't get why they would hear one case and not another for the same state. Makes no sense.
The censorship king from out of state.
Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states
Thats correct.Honeyman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 1:10 pmJust because it's on the docket doesn't mean they are going to hear the case, does it? They could say no, like they did yesterday to the Pennsylvania farce, or they could just ignore this, I believe.Bryce wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 12:58 pmhttps://www.supremecourt.gov/search.asp ... 2o155.htmlRate This wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 11:55 amThey have not agreed to hear this case. I searched high and low. Some third rate blog claiming so doesn’t count. Texas does not have standing here either. They have to show they were injured somehow. It’s beyond a baseless suit. It makes a Hail Mary look like that play you run on first down. It’s a farce.Bryce wrote: ↑Tue Dec 08, 2020 9:02 pmDon't worry. it's above your pay grade.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Tue Dec 08, 2020 9:01 pmI don't get why they would hear one case and not another for the same state. Makes no sense.