Supreme Court Should Order New Elections In States Where Fraud Occurred

[TC Shuts Up]

USSC should order whole new elections in states where fraud likely occurred, and those elections should be supervised and bird dogged by loyal military and paramilitary officers. A loyalty oath to the US and US Constitution would be required for all election officials, military and paramilitary.

[Rate This]

USSC should order whole new elections in states where fraud likely occurred, and those elections should be supervised and bird dogged by loyal military and paramilitary officers. A loyalty oath to the US and US Constitution would be required for all election officials, military and paramilitary.

We don’t order new elections in this country on that scale.

[Honeyman]

USSC should order whole new elections in states where fraud likely occurred, and those elections should be supervised and bird dogged by loyal military and paramilitary officers. A loyalty oath to the US and US Constitution would be required for all election officials, military and paramilitary.

Except nobody has proven fraud occurred, so your point is moot.

[Mark Elliott]

USSC should order whole new elections in states where fraud likely occurred, and those elections should be supervised and bird dogged by loyal military and paramilitary officers. A loyalty oath to the US and US Constitution would be required for all election officials, military and paramilitary.

First time caller, long time listener. Fascinating idea. Under what law, doctrine or article of the Constitution allows for this? I'll hang up and listen for the answer.

[Bryce]

The thing is, some of the fraud happened before the first vote was cast.

[Rate This]

The thing is, some of the fraud happened before the first vote was cast.

Such as what exactly? Can you provide specific evidence where none of these other folks can?

[Bryce]

The thing is, some of the fraud happened before the first vote was cast.

Such as what exactly? Can you provide specific evidence where none of these other folks can?

Violating state constitutions to change rules.

[km1125]

The thing is, some of the fraud happened before the first vote was cast.

Such as what exactly? Can you provide specific evidence where none of these other folks can?

How about using state grants targeted only to Democrat stronghold counties for voter registration drives?

[Rate This]

The thing is, some of the fraud happened before the first vote was cast.

Such as what exactly? Can you provide specific evidence where none of these other folks can?

Violating state constitutions to change rules.

Ok... when state courts have looked at that they have found that not to be the case.

[Rate This]

The thing is, some of the fraud happened before the first vote was cast.

Such as what exactly? Can you provide specific evidence where none of these other folks can?

How about using state grants targeted only to Democrat stronghold counties for voter registration drives?

What are you talking about?