Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 30 at 9:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

Scientific American endorses a President for the first time in 175 years.

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
User avatar
Honeyman
Posts: 5890
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:44 pm

Scientific American endorses a President for the first time in 175 years.

Post by Honeyman » Wed Sep 16, 2020 5:24 pm

Shockingly, it's not the idiot who looks up at the sun during a solar eclipse, fake sharpies a hurricane map or doesn't believe in climate change.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/arti ... joe-biden/


The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science. The most devastating example is his dishonest and inept response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which cost more than 190,000 Americans their lives by the middle of September. He has also attacked environmental protections, medical care, and the researchers and public science agencies that help this country prepare for its greatest challenges. That is why we urge you to vote for Joe Biden, who is offering fact-based plans to protect our health, our economy and the environment. These and other proposals he has put forth can set the country back on course for a safer, more prosperous and more equitable future.


The censorship king from out of state.

MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 6450
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: Scientific American endorses a President for the first time in 175 years.

Post by MotorCityRadioFreak » Wed Sep 16, 2020 5:54 pm

But but but....the exploding trees!


They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.

TC Shuts Up
Posts: 2314
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 12:10 pm

Fake Science

Post by TC Shuts Up » Wed Sep 16, 2020 6:09 pm

"Science" has been corrupt for a long time, and is even more so now. It used to be they would fake studies to get published, or push an agenda. Now, they are obviously paid to take political positions.


Disagreeing with Communists is NOT an impeachable offense.

Never eat Sushi past its expiration date.

Those who refuse to drain the swamp are doomed to drown in it.

User avatar
Honeyman
Posts: 5890
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:44 pm

Re: Fake Science

Post by Honeyman » Wed Sep 16, 2020 6:16 pm

TC Shuts Up wrote:
Wed Sep 16, 2020 6:09 pm
"Science" has been corrupt for a long time, and is even more so now. It used to be they would fake studies to get published, or push an agenda. Now, they are obviously paid to take political positions.
This publication has been around almost 2 centuries. Einstein was a contributor.

You're a whack job.


The censorship king from out of state.

Deleted User 14896

Re: Fake Science

Post by Deleted User 14896 » Wed Sep 16, 2020 8:13 pm

Honeyman wrote:
Wed Sep 16, 2020 6:16 pm
TC Shuts Up wrote:
Wed Sep 16, 2020 6:09 pm
"Science" has been corrupt for a long time, and is even more so now. It used to be they would fake studies to get published, or push an agenda. Now, they are obviously paid to take political positions.
This publication has been around almost 2 centuries. Einstein was a contributor.

You're a whack job.
TC:
Wanted to make sure you knew Science and Scientific American are two different publications.



Post Reply Previous topicNext topic