Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 30 at 9:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Pelosi Tried To Sneak $1 Billion Abortion Slush Fund Into Emergency COVID-19 Bill
- audiophile
- Posts: 8571
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Pelosi Tried To Sneak $1 Billion Abortion Slush Fund Into Emergency COVID-19 Bill
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Re: Pelosi Tried To Sneak $1 Billion Abortion Slush Fund Into Emergency COVID-19 Bill
The Republicans did the exact same thing... those GOP hacks...audiophile wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 7:02 pmhttps://pjmedia.com/trending/nancy-pelo ... irus-bill/
Pot meet Kettle you hack!
- audiophile
- Posts: 8571
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Pelosi Tried To Sneak $1 Billion Abortion Slush Fund Into Emergency COVID-19 Bill
Whom did they attempt to add funding to?
Last edited by audiophile on Sat Mar 14, 2020 7:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Re: Pelosi Tried To Sneak $1 Billion Abortion Slush Fund Into Emergency COVID-19 Bill
Whom tried to restrict reproductive rights in a time of panic?
“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Noam Chomsky
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
- audiophile
- Posts: 8571
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Pelosi Tried To Sneak $1 Billion Abortion Slush Fund Into Emergency COVID-19 Bill
Besides it's kind of ironic for Pelosi to add funds to kill babies, in bill meant to save lives from a communicable virus...
Might as well skip a step.
Might as well skip a step.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Re: Pelosi Tried To Sneak $1 Billion Abortion Slush Fund Into Emergency COVID-19 Bill
Let’s at least get our terms straight... it’s a baby after it’s born and a fetus before.audiophile wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 7:18 pmBesides it's kind of ironic for Pelosi to add funds to kill babies, in bill meant to save lives from a communicable virus...
Might as well skip a step.
Secondly adding anti-abortion language to the bill stinks just as bad. There’s no logical reason for that to be there. So both tried to put abortion language in it. What the language did is irrelevant here. Who tried first will tell us which one was the tat in the tit for tat.
- audiophile
- Posts: 8571
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Pelosi Tried To Sneak $1 Billion Abortion Slush Fund Into Emergency COVID-19 Bill
1. Oh they call that semantics.
2. Look at the timing.
2. Look at the timing.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Re: Pelosi Tried To Sneak $1 Billion Abortion Slush Fund Into Emergency COVID-19 Bill
1. It’s called a fact. It’s an embryo in the egg and a chick outside it. No semantics to it. You don’t get to change and extend terms to prop up an argument or make yourself feel better. If you wish to play this game I could call you a Muslim if you want.. I mean Abrahamic religion, history of killing and bigotry... seems like semantics to me.
2. Which side put an abortion thing in first is the question? I imagine the GOP since they were against the bill originally so they would try to put something unpalatable in it to kill it. That’s what we need to figure out. You are acting like it was all the Democrats here.. the Republicans had no business pulling their shit either.
Re: Pelosi Tried To Sneak $1 Billion Abortion Slush Fund Into Emergency COVID-19 Bill
Both sides were wrong...period
- audiophile
- Posts: 8571
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Pelosi Tried To Sneak $1 Billion Abortion Slush Fund Into Emergency COVID-19 Bill
I once had a legal battle over three letters with a high-powered DC law firm that changed nothing. Guess what, they lost. All I had prove it was used interchangeably. I wrote the legal reply myself.Rate This wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 7:39 pm1. It’s called a fact. It’s an embryo in the egg and a chick outside it. No semantics to it. You don’t get to change and extend terms to prop up an argument or make yourself feel better. If you wish to play this game I could call you a Muslim if you want.. I mean Abrahamic religion, history of killing and bigotry... seems like semantics to me.
2. Which side put an abortion thing in first is the question? I imagine the GOP since they were against the bill originally so they would try to put something unpalatable in it to kill it. That’s what we need to figure out. You are acting like it was all the Democrats here.. the Republicans had no business pulling their shit either.
In the same way, de-humanizing a person by calling it a fetus will get you nowhere here.
Walk up to a heavily pregnant woman that you don't know and ask her when her fetus is going to be born? You will get slapped!
Or ask this:
When is the fetus shower?
Where is the fetus registry?
What is the fetus due date?
That cute couple is expectant, I wonder if that couple has a cute fetus?
The drunk driver was charged with a double homicide for killing woman and her fetus?
Have a nice day!
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Re: Pelosi Tried To Sneak $1 Billion Abortion Slush Fund Into Emergency COVID-19 Bill
All of those questions involve something in the future when it would be a baby except the drunk driving one, usually it’s called an unborn baby which is a more polite term for... fetus. Are you purposely bad at arguments or something? These are coming out especially half baked.audiophile wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 9:48 amI once had a legal battle over three letters with a high-powered DC law firm that changed nothing. Guess what, they lost. All I had prove it was used interchangeably. I wrote the legal reply myself.Rate This wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 7:39 pm1. It’s called a fact. It’s an embryo in the egg and a chick outside it. No semantics to it. You don’t get to change and extend terms to prop up an argument or make yourself feel better. If you wish to play this game I could call you a Muslim if you want.. I mean Abrahamic religion, history of killing and bigotry... seems like semantics to me.
2. Which side put an abortion thing in first is the question? I imagine the GOP since they were against the bill originally so they would try to put something unpalatable in it to kill it. That’s what we need to figure out. You are acting like it was all the Democrats here.. the Republicans had no business pulling their shit either.
In the same way, de-humanizing a person by calling it a fetus will get you nowhere here.
Walk up to a heavily pregnant woman that you don't know and ask her when her fetus is going to be born? You will get slapped!
Or ask this:
When is the fetus shower?
Where is the fetus registry?
What is the fetus due date?
That cute couple is expectant, I wonder if that couple has a cute fetus?
The drunk driver was charged with a double homicide for killing woman and her fetus?
Have a nice day!
The dictionary told me to let you know:
Definition of fetus
: an unborn or unhatched vertebrate especially after attaining the basic structural plan of its kind
specifically : a developing human from usually two months after conception to birth.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fetus
From conception to 8 weeks it’s an embryo:
Definition of embryo
1a : an animal in the early stages of growth and differentiation that are characterized by cleavage, the laying down of fundamental tissues, and the formation of primitive organs and organ systems
especially : the developing human individual from the time of implantation to the end of the eighth week after conception
b archaic : a vertebrate at any stage of development prior to birth or hatching.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/embryo
People call it a baby when it really is actually a fetus or at an earlier point an embryo. Nowhere does it say that it’s a person and that calling it an embryo or fetus dehumanizes it. That’s you letting your emotions run wild.
- audiophile
- Posts: 8571
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Pelosi Tried To Sneak $1 Billion Abortion Slush Fund Into Emergency COVID-19 Bill
LOL, you must be pretty bored to come back with definitions.
I know more about that then you may ever know. I got the pictures to prove it.
I know more about that then you may ever know. I got the pictures to prove it.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Re: Pelosi Tried To Sneak $1 Billion Abortion Slush Fund Into Emergency COVID-19 Bill
You know more about definitions? Ok Miriam... do tell.audiophile wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 1:56 pmLOL, you must be pretty bored to come back with definitions.
I know more about that then you may ever know. I got the pictures to prove it.
Yeah I’m bored... gonna be a quiet few days off... that’s ok I need it.