That was my point...Turkeytop wrote:Trump never had to cross any line. He's always been on the extreme, far side of the line. Never been near anything approaching genius.NS8401 wrote:Point taken though that's a line he crossed by simply existing I think...
Acceptable registrations in the queue through June 3 at 5:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Fixed...
Re: Fixed...
Re: Fixed...
Sorry. The Parents (shills for hill) are fair game. Why did they choose NOW to do this? Why is Mr. Kahn selling green cards? Why is he so interested in implementing sharia law in the US? The guy will crap and use our constitution to wipe himself with it.
Re: Fixed...
Wrong. No one is fair game for that kind of treatment, regardless of which candidate they're working for.jry wrote:Sorry. The Parents (shills for hill) are fair game
I don't mean to brag, but I just put a puzzle together in 1 day and the box said 2-4 years.
Re: Fixed...
So only the parents have freedom of speech and not Trump? And if you have a child killed in a war, that grants you immunity to say whatever you want on a national stage about a politician and the politician can't respond?Turkeytop wrote:Wrong. No one is fair game for that kind of treatment, regardless of which candidate they're working for.jry wrote:Sorry. The Parents (shills for hill) are fair game
Re: Fixed...
It isn't a free speech issue. It's about respect. I've worked on many political campaigns over the years and I have never been treated disrespectfully by representatives of the other parties. Indeed, our encounters are usually friendly and cordial.bmw wrote:So only the parents have freedom of speech and not Trump? And if you have a child killed in a war, that grants you immunity to say whatever you want on a national stage about a politician and the politician can't respond?Turkeytop wrote:Wrong. No one is fair game for that kind of treatment, regardless of which candidate they're working for.jry wrote:Sorry. The Parents (shills for hill) are fair game
Trump has taken political discourse to a new low.
I don't mean to brag, but I just put a puzzle together in 1 day and the box said 2-4 years.
Re: Fixed...
Sure, the.politician can respond. The problem is, that because T Rump is such a buffoon, he chose the worst possible way to do so.bmw wrote:the politician can't respond?
The smart way would have been to chastise HilLIEry and NOT the parents of a fallen soldier.
Some people you just can't attack and look good even if you're right.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
- audiophile
- Posts: 8660
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Fixed...
Hmmm, seems all parties can agree on this one.Turkeytop wrote:It isn't a free speech issue. It's about respect. I've worked on many political campaigns over the years and I have never been treated disrespectfully by representatives of the other parties. Indeed, our encounters are usually friendly and cordial.bmw wrote:So only the parents have freedom of speech and not Trump? And if you have a child killed in a war, that grants you immunity to say whatever you want on a national stage about a politician and the politician can't respond?Turkeytop wrote:Wrong. No one is fair game for that kind of treatment, regardless of which candidate they're working for.jry wrote:Sorry. The Parents (shills for hill) are fair game
Trump has taken political discourse to a new low.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!